Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Using Lidocaine Patch 5% in Traumatic Rib Fractures

被引:46
|
作者
Ingalls, Nichole K. [1 ]
Horton, Zachary A. [1 ]
Bettendorf, Matthew [2 ]
Frye, Ira [1 ]
Rodriguez, Carlos [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Grand Rapids Med Educ & Res Ctr, Grand Rapids, MI 49503 USA
[2] Cent Minnesota Surg, Gen & Bariatr Surg, Sartell, MN USA
关键词
LIDODERM; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.10.020
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The lidocaine patch 5% was developed to treat postherpetic neuralgia. Anecdotal experience at our institution suggests the lidocaine patch 5% decreases narcotic usage in patients with traumatic rib fractures. This trial was developed to define the patch's efficacy. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with rib fractures admitted to the trauma service at our Level I trauma center were enrolled and randomized in a 1 to 1 double-blind manner to receive a lidocaine patch 5% or placebo patch. Fifty-eight patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled from January 2007 to August 2008. Demographic and clinical information were recorded. The primary outcomes variable was total narcotic use, analyzed using the 1-tailed Mann-Whitney test. The secondary outcomes variables included non-narcotic pain medication, average pain score, pulmonary complications, and length of stay. Significance was defined based on a 1-sided test for the primary outcome and 2-sided tests for other comparisons, at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients received the lidocaine patch 5% and 25 received the placebo patch. There were no significant differences in age, number of rib fractures, gender, trauma mechanism, preinjury lung disease, smoking history, percent of current smokers, and need for placement of chest tube between the lidocaine patch 5% and placebo groups. There was no difference between the lidocaine patch 5% and placebo groups, respectively, with regard to total IV narcotic usage: median, 0.23 units versus 0.26 units; total oral narcotics: median, 4 units versus 7 units; pain score: 5.6 +/- 0.4 versus 6.0 +/- 0.3 (mean +/- SEM); length of stay: 7.8 +/- 1.1 versus 6.2 +/- 0.7; or percentage of patients with pulmonary complications: 72.7% versus 72.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The lidocaine patch 5% does not significantly improve pain control in polytrauma patients with traumatic rib fractures. (J Am Coll Surg 2010;210:205-209. (C) 2010 by the American College of Surgeons)
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 209
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Lidocaine 5% Patch for Treatment of Acute Pain After Robotic Cardiac Surgery and Prevention of Persistent Incisional Pain: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trial
    Vrooman, Bruce
    Kapural, Leonardo
    Sarwar, Sheryar
    Mascha, Edward J.
    Mihaljevic, Tomislav
    Gillinov, Marc
    Qavi, Shahbaz
    Sessler, Daniel I.
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2015, 16 (08) : 1610 - 1621
  • [32] Creatine Supplementation in Fibromyalgia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Alves, Christiano R. R.
    Santiago, Bianca M.
    Lima, Fernanda R.
    Otaduy, Maria C. G.
    Calich, Ana Luisa
    Tritto, Aline C. C.
    de Sa Pinto, Ana Lucia
    Roschel, Hamilton
    Leite, Claudia C.
    Benatti, Fabiana B.
    Bonfa, Eloisa
    Gualano, Bruno
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2013, 65 (09) : 1449 - 1459
  • [33] A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Trial of Montelukast for Acute Bronchiolitis
    Amirav, Israel
    Luder, Anthony S.
    Kruger, Natalie
    Borovitch, Yael
    Babai, Ilan
    Miron, Dan
    Zuker, Miriam
    Tal, Gay
    Mandelberg, Avigdor
    PEDIATRICS, 2008, 122 (06) : E1249 - E1255
  • [34] Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of albuterol in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy
    Kissel, JT
    McDermott, MP
    Mendell, JR
    King, WM
    Pandya, S
    Griggs, RC
    Tawil, R
    Cos, L
    Langsam, A
    Martens, B
    Brower, C
    Herr, BE
    Figlewicz, D
    Forrester, J
    Downing, K
    Holloway, RG
    Hubble, J
    Kolassa, J
    NEUROLOGY, 2001, 57 (08) : 1434 - 1440
  • [35] Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of local analgesia in laparoscopy
    Einarsson, JI
    Sun, J
    Tarrant, T
    Young, AE
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (04): : 21S - 21S
  • [36] Pentoxifylline in ALS - A double-blind, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial
    Meininger, V
    Asselain, B
    Guillet, P
    Leigh, PN
    Ludolph, A
    Lacomblez, L
    Robberecht, W
    NEUROLOGY, 2006, 66 (01) : 88 - 92
  • [37] RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL OF FEVERFEW IN MIGRAINE PREVENTION
    MURPHY, JJ
    HEPTINSTALL, S
    MITCHELL, JRA
    LANCET, 1988, 2 (8604): : 189 - 192
  • [38] A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Olanzapine in the Treatment of Trichotillomania
    Van Ameringen, Michael
    Mancini, Catherine
    Patterson, Beth
    Bennett, Mark
    Oakman, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 71 (10) : 1336 - 1343
  • [39] Sorafenib in Hepatopulmonary Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Kawut, Steven M.
    Ellenberg, Susan S.
    Krowka, Michael J.
    Goldberg, David
    Vargas, Hugo
    Koch, David
    Sharkoski, Tiffany
    Al-Naamani, Nadine
    Fox, Alyson
    Brown, Robert
    Levitsky, Joshua
    Oh, Jae K.
    Lin, Grace
    Song, Nianfu
    Mottram, Carl
    Doyle, Margaret F.
    Kaplan, David E.
    Gupta, Samir
    Fallon, Michael B.
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 25 (08) : 1155 - 1164
  • [40] The cult of the double-blind placebo-controlled trial
    Ellis, SJ
    Adams, RF
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 1997, 51 (01): : 36 - 39