Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Using Lidocaine Patch 5% in Traumatic Rib Fractures

被引:46
|
作者
Ingalls, Nichole K. [1 ]
Horton, Zachary A. [1 ]
Bettendorf, Matthew [2 ]
Frye, Ira [1 ]
Rodriguez, Carlos [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Grand Rapids Med Educ & Res Ctr, Grand Rapids, MI 49503 USA
[2] Cent Minnesota Surg, Gen & Bariatr Surg, Sartell, MN USA
关键词
LIDODERM; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.10.020
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The lidocaine patch 5% was developed to treat postherpetic neuralgia. Anecdotal experience at our institution suggests the lidocaine patch 5% decreases narcotic usage in patients with traumatic rib fractures. This trial was developed to define the patch's efficacy. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with rib fractures admitted to the trauma service at our Level I trauma center were enrolled and randomized in a 1 to 1 double-blind manner to receive a lidocaine patch 5% or placebo patch. Fifty-eight patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled from January 2007 to August 2008. Demographic and clinical information were recorded. The primary outcomes variable was total narcotic use, analyzed using the 1-tailed Mann-Whitney test. The secondary outcomes variables included non-narcotic pain medication, average pain score, pulmonary complications, and length of stay. Significance was defined based on a 1-sided test for the primary outcome and 2-sided tests for other comparisons, at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients received the lidocaine patch 5% and 25 received the placebo patch. There were no significant differences in age, number of rib fractures, gender, trauma mechanism, preinjury lung disease, smoking history, percent of current smokers, and need for placement of chest tube between the lidocaine patch 5% and placebo groups. There was no difference between the lidocaine patch 5% and placebo groups, respectively, with regard to total IV narcotic usage: median, 0.23 units versus 0.26 units; total oral narcotics: median, 4 units versus 7 units; pain score: 5.6 +/- 0.4 versus 6.0 +/- 0.3 (mean +/- SEM); length of stay: 7.8 +/- 1.1 versus 6.2 +/- 0.7; or percentage of patients with pulmonary complications: 72.7% versus 72.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The lidocaine patch 5% does not significantly improve pain control in polytrauma patients with traumatic rib fractures. (J Am Coll Surg 2010;210:205-209. (C) 2010 by the American College of Surgeons)
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 209
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lidocaine Patch (5%) in Treatment of Persistent Inguinal Postherniorrhaphy Pain A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Crossover Trial
    Bischoff, Joakim M.
    Petersen, Marian
    Uceyler, Nurcan
    Sommer, Claudia
    Kehlet, Henrik
    Werner, Mads U.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2013, 119 (06) : 1444 - 1452
  • [2] Analgesic effects of a 5% lidocaine patch after cesarean section: A randomized placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial
    de Queiroz, Vaniely Kaliny Pinheiro
    Marinho, Alexandre Magno da Nobrega
    de Barros, Guilherme Antonio Moreira
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2021, 73
  • [3] Intravenous lidocaine for the management of traumatic rib fractures: A double-blind randomized controlled trial (INITIATE program of research)
    Patton, Petrease
    Vogt, Kelly
    Priestap, Fran
    Parry, Neil
    Ball, Ian M.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2022, 93 (04): : 496 - 502
  • [4] Intravenous lidocaine for the management of traumatic rib fractures: A double-blind randomized controlled trial (INITIATE program of research)
    Kasetti, Pragna
    Sonawane, Urvi
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2023, 94 (06): : E48 - E49
  • [5] Nebulized lidocaine for flexible bronchoscopy - A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Stolz, D
    Chhajed, N
    Leuppi, J
    Pflimlin, E
    Tamm, M
    CHEST, 2005, 128 (03) : 1756 - 1760
  • [6] Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial of sibutramine
    Bray, GA
    Ryan, DH
    Gordon, D
    Heidingsfelder, S
    Cerise, F
    Wilson, K
    OBESITY RESEARCH, 1996, 4 (03): : 263 - 270
  • [7] Applicability of Press Needles to a Double-blind Trial A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial
    Miyazaki, Shougo
    Hagihara, Akihito
    Kanda, Ryo
    Mukaino, Yoshito
    Nobutomo, Koichi
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2009, 25 (05): : 438 - 444
  • [8] Clinical Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine for Thyroidectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Geun Joo Choi
    Hyun Kang
    Eun Jin Ahn
    Jong In Oh
    Chong Wha Baek
    Yong Hun Jung
    Jin Yun Kim
    World Journal of Surgery, 2016, 40 : 2941 - 2947
  • [9] Clinical Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine for Thyroidectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Choi, Geun Joo
    Kang, Hyun
    Ahn, Eun Jin
    Oh, Jong In
    Baek, Chong Wha
    Jung, Yong Hun
    Kim, Jin Yun
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 40 (12) : 2941 - 2947
  • [10] Effect of intravenous lidocaine on the incidence of postextubation laryngospasm: A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial
    Aljonaieh, Khalid Ibrahim
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 12 (01) : 3 - 9