Automatic Parameter Selection for Multimodal Image Registration

被引:17
|
作者
Hahn, Dieter A. [1 ,2 ]
Daum, Volker [1 ,2 ]
Hornegger, Joachim [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nuremberg FAU, Pattern Recognit Lab, Dept Comp Sci, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
[2] FAU, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[3] Erlangen Grad Sch Adv Opt Technol SAOT, D-91052 Erlangen, Germany
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Adaptive binning; automatic parameter estimation; coincidence weighting; normalized mutual information; Parzen-window estimation; NORMALIZED MUTUAL INFORMATION; INTERPOLATION ARTIFACTS; DENSITY-ESTIMATION; MAXIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1109/TMI.2010.2041358
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Over the past ten years similarity measures based on intensity distributions have become state-of-the-art in automatic multimodal image registration. An implementation for clinical usage has to support a plurality of images. However, a generally applicable parameter configuration for the number and sizes of histogram bins, optimal Parzen-window kernel widths or background thresholds cannot be found. This explains why various research groups present partly contradictory empirical proposals for these parameters. This paper proposes a set of data-driven estimation schemes for a parameter-free implementation that eliminates major caveats of heuristic trial and error. We present the following novel approaches: a new coincidence weighting scheme to reduce the influence of background noise on the similarity measure in combination with Max-Lloyd requantization, and a tradeoff for the automatic estimation of the number of histogram bins. These methods have been integrated into a state-of-the-art rigid registration that is based on normalized mutual information and applied to CT-MR, PET-MR, and MR-MR image pairs of the RIRE 2.0 database. We compare combinations of the proposed techniques to a standard implementation using default parameters, which can be found in the literature, and to a manual registration by a medical expert. Additionally, we analyze the effects of various histogram sizes, sampling rates, and error thresholds for the number of histogram bins. The comparison of the parameter selection techniques yields 25 approaches in total, with 114 registrations each. The number of bins has no significant influence on the proposed implementation that performs better than both the manual and the standard method in terms of acceptance rates and target registration error (TRE). The overall mean TRE is 2.34 mm compared to 2.54 mm for the manual registration and 6.48 mm for a standard implementation. Our results show a significant TRE reduction for distortion-corrected magnetic resonance images.
引用
收藏
页码:1140 / 1155
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Flows of diffeomorphisms for multimodal image registration
    Chefd'hotel, C
    Hermosillo, G
    Faugeras, O
    2002 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 753 - 756
  • [22] Assembly Method for Multimodal Image Registration
    Li, Jinping
    Chang, Xiaoli
    Xia, Yingjie
    Han, Yanbin
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GRANULAR COMPUTING (GRC 2012), 2012, : 258 - 263
  • [23] Multimodal Image Registration of Lung images
    Veduruparthi, Bijju Kranthi
    Mukherjee, Jayanta
    Das, Partha Pratim
    Chatterjee, Sanjoy
    Ray, Soumendranath
    Sen, Partha
    2015 FIFTH NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION, PATTERN RECOGNITION, IMAGE PROCESSING AND GRAPHICS (NCVPRIPG), 2015,
  • [24] FAST PREDICTIVE MULTIMODAL IMAGE REGISTRATION
    Yang, Xiao
    Kwitt, Roland
    Styner, Martin
    Niethammer, Marc
    2017 IEEE 14TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING (ISBI 2017), 2017, : 858 - 862
  • [25] Automatic control-point selection for image registration using disparity fitting
    Conover, Damon M.
    Delaney, John K.
    Ricciardi, Paola
    Loew, Murray H.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2012: IMAGE PROCESSING, 2012, 8314
  • [26] Automatic Parameter Selection for Feature-Enhanced Radar Image Restoration
    Seng, C. H.
    Bouzerdoum, A.
    Phung, S. L.
    Amin, M.
    2010 IEEE RADAR CONFERENCE, 2010, : 1123 - 1127
  • [27] Automatic Part Selection for Groupwise Registration
    Zhang, Pei
    Cootes, Timothy F.
    INFORMATION PROCESSING IN MEDICAL IMAGING, 2011, 6801 : 636 - 647
  • [28] Automatic Parameter Selection in PET Image Reconstruction Based on No-reference Image Quality Assessment
    Herraiz, J. L.
    Gabarda, S.
    Cristobal, G.
    2012 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE RECORD (NSS/MIC), 2012, : 3371 - 3374
  • [29] IMAGE REGISTRATION BY AUTOMATIC SUBIMAGE SELECTION AND MAXIMIZATION OF COMBINED MUTUAL INFORMATION AND SPATIAL INFORMATION
    Amankwah, Anthony
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2013, : 4379 - 4382
  • [30] Multimodal image registration techniques: a comprehensive survey
    Velesaca, Henry O.
    Bastidas, Gisel
    Rouhani, Mohammad
    Sappa, Angel D.
    MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 83 (23) : 63919 - 63947