Combining permutation tests to rank systemically important banks

被引:1
|
作者
Frattarolo, Lorenzo [1 ]
Parpinel, Francesca [1 ]
Pizzi, Claudio [1 ]
机构
[1] Ca Foscari Univ Venice, Dept Econ, San Giobbe Cannaregio 873, I-30121 Venice, Italy
来源
STATISTICAL METHODS AND APPLICATIONS | 2020年 / 29卷 / 03期
关键词
Systemic risk; Global Systemically Important Bank; Particle Swarm Optimization; Permutation tests; CAPITAL SHORTFALL; RISK; CONNECTEDNESS;
D O I
10.1007/s10260-019-00494-6
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
In this work we propose the use of a nonparametric procedure to investigate the relationship between the Regulator's Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs) classification and the equity-based systemic risk measures. The proposed procedure combines several permutation tests to investigate the equality of themultivariate distribution of two groups and assumes only the hypothesis of exchangeability of variables. In our novel approach, the weights used in the combination of tests are obtained using the Particle Swarm Optimization heuristic and quantify the informativeness about the selection. Finally, the p value of the combined test measures the reliability of the result. Empirical results about the selection of G-SIBs show how considering the systematic (beta), stress (.CoVaR) and connectedness components (in-out connection) of systemic risk cover more than 70% of weight in all the considered years.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 596
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficiency comparisons of rank and permutation tests
    Neuhäuser, M
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2005, 24 (11) : 1777 - 1778
  • [22] Systemic risk measurement: bucketing global systemically important banks
    Marina Brogi
    Valentina Lagasio
    Luca Riccetti
    Annals of Finance, 2021, 17 : 319 - 351
  • [23] Systemically important banks and financial stability: The case of Latin America
    Tabak, Benjamin M.
    Fazio, Dimas M.
    Cajueiro, Daniel O.
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2013, 37 (10) : 3855 - 3866
  • [24] The Impact of the Designation of Global Systemically Important Banks on Their Business Model
    Violon, Aurelien
    Durant, Dominique
    Toader, Oana
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CENTRAL BANKING, 2020, 16 (05): : 95 - 142
  • [25] Collateral composition, diversification risk, and systemically important merchant banks
    Derviz, Alexis
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STABILITY, 2014, 14 : 23 - 34
  • [26] Expected default based score for identifying systemically important banks
    Yao, Yanzhen
    Li, Jianping
    Zhu, Xiaoqian
    Wei, Lu
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2017, 64 : 589 - 600
  • [27] Identifying Systemically Important Banks Based on an Improved DebtRank Model
    Wang, Hu
    Li, Shouwei
    COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 62 (04) : 1505 - 1523
  • [28] Identifying Systemically Important Banks Based on an Improved DebtRank Model
    Hu Wang
    Shouwei Li
    Computational Economics, 2023, 62 : 1505 - 1523
  • [29] Identifying Systemically Important Banks: A temporal approach for macroprudential policies
    Spelta, A.
    Pecora, N.
    Kaltwasser, P. Rovira
    JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 2019, 41 (01) : 197 - 218
  • [30] Systemic risk measurement: bucketing global systemically important banks
    Brogi, Marina
    Lagasio, Valentina
    Riccetti, Luca
    ANNALS OF FINANCE, 2021, 17 (03) : 319 - 351