The influence of anesthesia on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgeries

被引:6
|
作者
Benuska, J. [1 ]
Plisova, M. [1 ]
Zabka, M. [1 ]
Horvath, J. [1 ]
Tisovsky, P. [1 ]
Novorolsky, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Comenius Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped & Trauma Surg, Ruzinovska 6, SK-82606 Bratislava, Slovakia
关键词
neuromonitoring; MEP; motor evoked potential; spinal deformity; anesthesia; propofol; sufentanil; ketamine; amplitude; MOTOR-EVOKED-POTENTIALS; TRANSCRANIAL ELECTRIC MOTOR; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; CORTEX STIMULATION; PROPOFOL; KETAMINE; ISOFLURANE; SCOLIOSIS; INCREASES; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.4149/BLL_2019_133
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative neuromonitoring using tc-MEPs satisfactorily detects motor tract integrity changes during spinal surgery. However, tc-MEP is affected by anesthesia and other factors, in which the stimulation threshold increases because the waveform amplitude decreases over time with the accumulation and boluses of anesthetics. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 139 patients. The average age was 30 years. Tc-MEPs were recorded bilaterally from the tibialis anterior muscle and the abductor hallucis muscle. Statistical tests were used to investigate the changes to evaluate anesthetic effects. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in tc-MEP amplitude change (%) between the groups of propofol (13 %), remifentanil (22 %) and sufentanil (26 %, p < 0.01). Significant differences were found between the groups of propofol, remifentanil, and sufentanil (20 %) and bolus sufentanil (-30 %), and bolus ketamine (730 %, p < 0.008). Major differences were observed between bolus sufentanil (-30 %) and bolus ketamine (730 %, p < 0.001). When comparing tc-MEPs with no amplitude, no significant difference was found between the groups of propofol (26 %), remifentanil (24 %), and sufentanil (28 %, p < 0.007). Substantial difference was found between the groups of propofol, remifentanil, and sufentanil (mean 26 %) and the group where ketamine boluses were administered. We didn't observe any loss of amplitude (0 %, p < 0.0002). CONCLUSION: IONM may be useless in patients where boluses of sufentanil are administered and also with Medical Research Council grades 3 and below. Consider applying IONM in patients with severe spinal deformity along with a higher age of over 50 and neurological deficit. Increasing stimulus intensity or facilitation techniques may be considered to improve the usefulness of tc-MEP. Our concept of findings supports the neurophysiological monitoring findings in other studies (Tab. 10, Ref. 45).
引用
收藏
页码:794 / 801
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord:: Our experience
    Perez-Orribo, L.
    Perez-Lorensu, P. J.
    Roldan-Delgado, H.
    Garcia-Conde, M.
    Spreafico, M.
    Garcia-Marin, V.
    REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA, 2008, 47 (05) : 236 - 241
  • [32] Multimodal Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Spinal Cord Surgery
    Taskiran, Emine
    Brandmeier, Sema
    Ozek, Erdinc
    Saris, Ramazan
    Bolukbasi, Fatihhan
    Elmaci, Ilhan
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 27 (03) : 436 - 440
  • [33] Results of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spinal canal surgery
    Zielinski, Piotr
    Gendek, Rafal
    Paczkowski, Dariusz
    Harat, Marek
    Dziegiel, Krzysztof
    Sokal, Pawel
    NEUROLOGIA I NEUROCHIRURGIA POLSKA, 2013, 47 (01) : 27 - 31
  • [34] Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring team's communique with anesthesia professionals
    Tewari, Anurag
    Francis, Lisa
    Samy, Ravi N.
    Kurth, Dean C.
    Castle, Joshua
    Frye, Tiffany
    Mahmoud, Mohamed
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 34 (01) : 84 - 93
  • [35] Anesthesia for intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring of the spinal cord
    Sloan, TB
    Heyer, EJ
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 19 (05) : 430 - 443
  • [36] Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during sacrectomy procedures
    Jahangiri, Faisal R.
    Eissa, Sami Al
    Jahangiri, Anila F.
    Al-Habib, Amro
    Neurodiagnostic Journal, 2013, 53 (04) : 312 - 322
  • [37] Use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in surgical treatment of spinal diseases
    Karan, Vedrana
    Dilvesi, Dula
    Karan, Mladen
    Papic, Vladimir
    Vulekovic, Petar
    SRPSKI ARHIV ZA CELOKUPNO LEKARSTVO, 2019, 147 (7-8) : 502 - 505
  • [38] Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring for Lateralization and Programming in Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Roth, Steven G.
    Lange, Steven
    Fama, Chris
    Haller, Jessica
    Briotte, Michael
    Paniccioli, Steven
    DeLaCruz, Priscilla
    Wilock, Meghan
    Pilitsis, Julie
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 123 (02) : A517 - A517
  • [39] Comparative Effectiveness Analyses of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Spinal Surgery
    Ney, John P.
    van der Goes, David N.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 31 (02) : 112 - 117
  • [40] Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord during spinal cord and spine surgery: A review focus on the corticospinal tracts
    Deletis, Vedran
    Sala, Francesco
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 119 (02) : 248 - 264