Health economic studies of colorectal cancer and the contribution of administrative data: A systematic review

被引:3
|
作者
Lemmon, Elizabeth [1 ]
Hanna, Catherine R. [2 ]
Hall, Peter [3 ]
Morris, Eva J. A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh Hlth Econ, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Glasgow, Inst Canc Sci, CRUK Clin Trials Unit, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh Canc Res Ctr, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Populat Hlth, Oxford, England
关键词
administrative data; bowel cancer; colorectal cancer; costs; health economic research; systematic review; OCCULT BLOOD-TEST; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; SCREENING-PROGRAM; BARIUM ENEMA; IMPACT; COLONOGRAPHY; COLONOSCOPY; CARE; CETUXIMAB; SERVICE;
D O I
10.1111/ecc.13477
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction Several forces are contributing to an increase in the number of people living with and surviving colorectal cancer (CRC). However, due to the lack of available data, little is known about the implications of these forces. In recent years, the use of administrative records to inform research has been increasing. The aim of this paper is to investigate the potential contribution that administrative data could have on the health economic research of CRC. Methods To achieve this aim, we conducted a systematic review of the health economic CRC literature published in the United Kingdom and Europe within the last decade (2009-2019). Results Thirty-seven relevant studies were identified and divided into economic evaluations, cost of illness studies and cost consequence analyses. Conclusions: The use of administrative data, including cancer registry, screening and hospital records, within the health economic research of CRC is commonplace. However, we found that this data often come from regional databases, which reduces the generalisability of results. Further, administrative data appear less able to contribute towards understanding the wider and indirect costs associated with the disease. We explore several ways in which various sources of administrative data could enhance future research in this area.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Measuring colorectal cancer incidence: the performance of an algorithm using administrative health data
    Mamadou Diop
    Erin C. Strumpf
    Geetanjali D. Datta
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18
  • [22] A team approach to improving colorectal cancer services using administrative health data
    Porter, Geoffrey
    Urquhart, Robin
    Bu, Jingyu
    Kendell, Cynthia
    MacIntyre, Maureen
    Dewar, Ron
    Kephart, George
    Asada, Yukiko
    Grunfeld, Eva
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2012, 10
  • [23] Health Economic Evaluations of Cancer in Brazil: A Systematic Review
    Campolina, Alessandro G.
    Yuba, Tania Y.
    Decimoni, Tassia C.
    Leandro, Roseli
    Estevez Diz, Maria del Pilar
    Novaes, Hillegonda M. D.
    de Soarez, Patricia C.
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 6
  • [24] Validation studies of Japanese administrative health care data: A scoping review
    Yamana, Hayato
    Konishi, Takaaki
    Yasunaga, Hideo
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2023, 32 (07) : 705 - 717
  • [25] Health Economic Models for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Methodological Review
    Koen Degeling
    Martin Vu
    Hendrik Koffijberg
    Hui-Li Wong
    Miriam Koopman
    Peter Gibbs
    Maarten IJzerman
    PharmacoEconomics, 2020, 38 : 683 - 713
  • [26] Health Economic Models for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Methodological Review
    Degeling, Koen
    Vu, Martin
    Koffijberg, Hendrik
    Wong, Hui-Li
    Koopman, Miriam
    Gibbs, Peter
    IJzerman, Maarten
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2020, 38 (07) : 683 - 713
  • [27] Validity of breast, lung and colorectal cancer diagnoses in administrative databases: a systematic review protocol
    Abraha, Iosief
    Giovannini, Gianni
    Serraino, Diego
    Fusco, Mario
    Montedori, Alessandro
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (03):
  • [28] An Evaluation of Comorbidity Indices Derived from Administrative Health Data: A Systematic Review
    Yurkovich, Marko
    Avina-Zubieta, Juan Antonio
    Thomas, Jamie
    Lacaille, Diane
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2012, 39 (08) : 1702 - 1702
  • [29] Development of frailty measurement tools using administrative health data: A systematic review
    Nghiem, Son
    Sajeewani, Disna
    Henderson, Katrina
    Afoakwah, Clifford
    Byrnes, Joshua
    Moyle, Wendy
    Scuffham, Paul
    ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2020, 89
  • [30] Systematic Review of Validation Studies of the Use of Administrative Data to Identify Serious Infections
    Barber, Claire
    Lacaille, Diane
    Fortin, Paul R.
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2013, 65 (08) : 1343 - 1357