Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence for the effect of target-distractor separation in a tactile search task

被引:3
|
作者
Gherri, Elena [1 ,4 ]
Zhao, Binglei [1 ,3 ]
Ambron, Elisabetta [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Human Cognit Neurosci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Delaware, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Inst Psychol & Behav Sci, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Bologna, Bologna, Italy
关键词
Touch; Selective attention; Event-related potentials; N140cc; Target-distractor separation; Touching and splayed fingers; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; NEURAL MECHANISMS; HAND; REPRESENTATION; INTERFERENCE; ATTENTION; COMPETITION; PERCEPTION; SELECTION; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108098
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Evidence suggests that the N140cc component of event-related potentials (ERP) observed in tactile search tasks reflects the attentional selection of the target. Here, we investigated whether the target selection processes are affected by the separation between the target and an ipsilateral singleton distractor (singletons delivered to contiguous or non-contiguous fingers of the same hand). In addition, the external distance between search items was varied through posture (splayed or touching fingers). Accuracy improved when target and distractor were delivered to contiguous fingers that were also touching. Regardless of target-distractor separation, the N140cc was larger when the external distance between search-array stimuli decreased (touching fingers). Importantly, a smaller N140cc was observed at reduced target-distractor separations, suggesting a narrower attentional focus for contiguous singletons. These findings reveal that the mechanisms responsible for tactile target selection in the presence of an ipsilateral singleton distractor are fundamentally different from those emerged in vision.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] QUANTITATIVE RELATIONS BETWEEN VISUAL-SEARCH SPEED AND TARGET-DISTRACTOR SIMILARITY
    BLOUGH, DS
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1988, 43 (01): : 57 - 71
  • [22] Effects of distractor load and temporal target-distractor separation on numerical comparison performance: A stimulus-competition approach
    Paas, F
    Adam, JJ
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2002, 90 (03) : 889 - 906
  • [23] Visual search asymmetry depends on target-distractor feature similarity: Is the asymmetry simply a result of distractor rejection speed?
    Yichi (Raven) Zhang
    Serge Onyper
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2020, 82 : 80 - 97
  • [24] Hand distance modulates the electrophysiological correlates of target selection during a tactile search task
    Ambron, Elisabetta
    Mas-Casadesus, Anna
    Gherri, Elena
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 55 (08)
  • [25] Target-distractor similarity predicts visual search efficiency but only for highly similar features
    Chapman, Angus F.
    Stormer, Viola S.
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2024, 86 (06) : 1872 - 1882
  • [26] Studying visual search using systems factorial methodology with target-distractor similarity as the factor
    Fific, Mario
    Townsend, James T.
    Eidels, Ami
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2008, 70 (04): : 583 - 603
  • [27] Visual search asymmetry depends on target-distractor feature similarity: Is the asymmetry simply a result of distractor rejection speed?
    Zhang, Yichi
    Onyper, Serge
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2020, 82 (01) : 80 - 97
  • [28] DUAL-TASK ANALYSIS OF DETECTION ACCURACY FOR THE CASE OF HIGH TARGET-DISTRACTOR SIMILARITY - FURTHER EVIDENCE FOR INDEPENDENT PROCESSING
    BURNS, D
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1979, 25 (03): : 185 - 196
  • [29] The effects of type and workload of internal tasks on voluntary saccades in a target-distractor saccade task
    Walcher, Sonja
    Korda, Ziva
    Koerner, Christof
    Benedek, Mathias
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (08):
  • [30] Target-distractor synchrony affects performance in a novel motor task for studying action selection
    James, Sebastian
    Bell, Olivia A.
    Nazli, Muhammed A. M.
    Pearce, Rachel E.
    Spencer, Jonathan
    Tyrrell, Katie
    Paine, Phillip J.
    Heaton, Timothy J.
    Anderson, Sean
    Da Lio, Mauro
    Gurney, Kevin
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (05):