Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence for the effect of target-distractor separation in a tactile search task

被引:3
|
作者
Gherri, Elena [1 ,4 ]
Zhao, Binglei [1 ,3 ]
Ambron, Elisabetta [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Human Cognit Neurosci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Delaware, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Inst Psychol & Behav Sci, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Bologna, Bologna, Italy
关键词
Touch; Selective attention; Event-related potentials; N140cc; Target-distractor separation; Touching and splayed fingers; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; NEURAL MECHANISMS; HAND; REPRESENTATION; INTERFERENCE; ATTENTION; COMPETITION; PERCEPTION; SELECTION; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108098
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Evidence suggests that the N140cc component of event-related potentials (ERP) observed in tactile search tasks reflects the attentional selection of the target. Here, we investigated whether the target selection processes are affected by the separation between the target and an ipsilateral singleton distractor (singletons delivered to contiguous or non-contiguous fingers of the same hand). In addition, the external distance between search items was varied through posture (splayed or touching fingers). Accuracy improved when target and distractor were delivered to contiguous fingers that were also touching. Regardless of target-distractor separation, the N140cc was larger when the external distance between search-array stimuli decreased (touching fingers). Importantly, a smaller N140cc was observed at reduced target-distractor separations, suggesting a narrower attentional focus for contiguous singletons. These findings reveal that the mechanisms responsible for tactile target selection in the presence of an ipsilateral singleton distractor are fundamentally different from those emerged in vision.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EFFECT OF TARGET-DISTRACTOR SEPARATION ON BOTH FACILITATION AND INHIBITION IN A PRIMING TASK
    FUENTES, LJ
    CATENA, A
    MARI, P
    MUELA, JA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 27 (3-4) : 40 - 40
  • [2] Attentional Capture by a Salient Distractor in Visual Search: The Effect of Target-Distractor Similarity
    Poiese, Paola
    Spalek, Thomas M.
    Di Lollo, Vincent
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2008, 62 (04): : 233 - 236
  • [3] TARGET-DISTRACTOR DISCRIMINABILITY IN VISUAL-SEARCH
    PASHLER, H
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1987, 41 (04): : 285 - 292
  • [4] Age, target-distractor similarity, and visual search
    Scialfa, CT
    Esau, SP
    Joffe, KM
    EXPERIMENTAL AGING RESEARCH, 1998, 24 (04) : 337 - 358
  • [5] Target features and target-distractor relation are both primed in visual search
    Meeter, Martijn
    Olivers, Christian N. L.
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2014, 76 (03) : 682 - 694
  • [6] The efficiency of memory search depends on categorical target-distractor similarity
    Shang, Linlin
    Zhao, Yuanfang
    Peelen, Marius
    PERCEPTION, 2022, 51 : 102 - 103
  • [7] Target-distractor congruency: sequential effects in a temporal flanker task
    Tomat, Miriam
    Wendt, Mike
    Luna-Rodriguez, Aquiles
    Sprengel, Michael
    Jacobsen, Thomas
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2020, 84 (02): : 292 - 301
  • [8] Spontaneous Distractor Reactivation With Age: Evidence for Bound Target-Distractor Representations in Memory
    Amer, Tarek
    Ngo, K. W. Joan
    Weeks, Jennifer C.
    Hasher, Lynn
    PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 31 (10) : 1315 - 1324
  • [9] Target-distractor similarity affects the selection efficacy of the relevant stimuli in a modified visual search task.
    Galera, C
    Eik, C
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2000, 41 (04) : S424 - S424
  • [10] You can't ignore what you can't separate: the effect of visually induced target-distractor separation on tactile selection
    Wesslein, Ann-Katrin
    Spence, Charles
    Frings, Christian
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2015, 22 (03) : 728 - 736