A global survey of COSMIC ionospheric peak electron density and its height: A comparison with ground-based ionosonde measurements

被引:43
|
作者
Chu, Yen-Hsyang [1 ]
Su, Chin-Lung [1 ]
Ko, Hsiao-Tsung [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cent Univ, Inst Space Sci, Chungli 32054, Taiwan
关键词
Ionosondes; GPS; COSMIC satellites; Electron density; GPS/MET RADIO OCCULTATION; PROFILES; VALIDATION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.asr.2009.10.014
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
With a network of ground-based ionosondes distributed around the world, the ionospheric peak electron density and its height measured by FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC satellites in terms of GPS radio occultation technique are extensively examined in this article. It is found that, in spite of the latitude, the mean values of the peak electron density measured by COSMIC satellites are systematically smaller than those observed by ground-based ionosondes. The discrepancy between them is dependent on the latitude, namely, it is small in low and mid-latitudes and large in high-latitude region. Moreover, statistical analysis shows that the slopes of the regression line that is best fitted to the scatter diagram of occultation-retrieved peak electron density (ordinate axis) versus ionosonde-observed peak density (abscissa axis) are universally less than one. This feature is believed to be the result of path average effect of non-uniform distribution of the electron density along the GSP ray during the occultation. A comparison between COSMIC-measured peak height and ionosonde-derived peak height hm F2 indicates that the former is systematically higher than the latter. The difference in the two can be as large as 20% or more in equatorial and low-latitude regions. This result implies that the peak height hmF2 derived from the virtual height through true height analysis based on Titheridge method seems to underestimate the true peak height. The correlation between COSMIC and ionosonde peak electron densities is analyzed and the result reveals that correlation coefficient seems to be dependent on the fluctuation of the occultation-retrieved electron density profile. The correlation will be higher (lower) for the electron density profiles with smaller (larger) fluctuations. This feature suggests that the inhomogeneous distribution of the electron density along the GPS ray path during the occultation plays an important role affecting the correlation between COSMIC and ionosonde measurements. (C) 2009 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 439
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Regional 3-D ionospheric electron density specification on the basis of data assimilation of ground-based GNSS and radio occultation data
    Aa, Ercha
    Liu, Siqing
    Huang, Wengeng
    Shi, Liqin
    Gong, Jiancun
    Chen, Yanhong
    Shen, Hua
    Li, Jianyong
    SPACE WEATHER-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2016, 14 (06): : 433 - 448
  • [32] ELECTRON AND ION TEMPERATURES - COMPARISON OF GROUND-BASED INCOHERENT-SCATTER AND AE-C SATELLITE MEASUREMENTS
    BENSON, RF
    BAUER, P
    BRACE, LH
    CARLSON, HC
    HAGEN, J
    HANSON, WB
    HOEGY, WR
    TORR, MR
    WAND, RH
    WICKWAR, VB
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1977, 82 (01): : 36 - 42
  • [33] Validation of International Reference Ionosphere model (IRI-2016) for F-region peak electron density height (hmF2): Comparison with Incoherent Scatter Radar (ISR) and ionosonde measurements at Millstone Hill
    Mengist, C. K.
    Yadav, S.
    Kotulak, K.
    Bahar, A.
    Zhang, S-R
    Seo, K-H
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2020, 65 (12) : 2773 - 2781
  • [34] Comparison of Electron Density and Temperature From the CSES Satellite With Other Space-Borne and Ground-Based Observations
    Yan, Rui
    Zhima, Zeren
    Xiong, Chao
    Shen, Xuhui
    Huang, Jianping
    Guan, Yibing
    Zhu, Xinghong
    Liu, Chao
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2020, 125 (10)
  • [35] Ionospheric conductances derived from satellite measurements of auroral UV and X-ray emissions, and ground-based electromagnetic data:: a comparison
    Aksnes, A
    Amm, O
    Stadsnes, J
    Ostgaard, N
    Germany, GA
    Vondrak, RR
    Sillanpää, I
    ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE, 2005, 23 (02) : 343 - 358
  • [36] Enhanced Polar Outflow Probe Ionospheric Radio Occultation Measurements at High Latitudes: Receiver Bias Estimation and Comparison With Ground-Based Observations
    Watson, C.
    Langley, R. B.
    Themens, D. R.
    Yau, A. W.
    Howarth, A. D.
    Jayachandran, P. T.
    RADIO SCIENCE, 2018, 53 (02) : 166 - 182
  • [37] Comparison between bottomside ionospheric profile parameters retrieved from FORMOSAT3 measurements and ground-based observations collected at Jicamarca
    Chuo, Yu-Jung
    Lee, Chien-Chih
    Chen, Wei-Sheng
    Reinisch, Bodo W.
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS, 2011, 73 (13) : 1665 - 1673
  • [38] Interhemispheric Asymmetries in Ionospheric Electron Density Responses During Geomagnetic Storms: A Study Using Space-Based and Ground-Based GNSS and AMPERE Observations
    Swarnalingam, N.
    Wu, D. L.
    Gopalswamy, N.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2022, 127 (05)
  • [39] DEDUCING COMPOSITION AND INCIDENT ELECTRON-SPECTRA FROM GROUND-BASED AURORAL OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS - VARIATIONS IN OXYGEN DENSITY
    HECHT, JH
    CHRISTENSEN, AB
    STRICKLAND, DJ
    MEIER, RR
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1989, 94 (A10): : 13553 - 13563
  • [40] COMPARISON OF GROUND-BASED AND TOTAL OZONE MAPPING SPECTROMETER MEASUREMENTS USED IN ASSESSING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE GLOBAL OZONE OBSERVING SYSTEM
    BOJKOV, RD
    MATEER, CL
    HANSSON, AL
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1988, 93 (D8): : 9525 - 9533