Generation of manufacturing process model entities

被引:0
|
作者
Horvath, L [1 ]
Rudas, IJ [1 ]
Szeghegyi, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Banki Donat Polytech, Dept Mfg Engn, H-1081 Budapest, Hungary
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Application of advanced geometric and technical models of mechanical products are applied for planning of manufacturing processes and CNC programs is one of the most widely investigated topics. Utilization of the flexibility of a flexible manufacturing system for fulfilling customer demands is impossible without flexible planning of manufacturing processes. This paper presents an approach to generic modeling of manufacturing processes and a method for creation Petri net representations of manufacturing process model entities. Manufacturing task features and process variants are taken into account. The Petri net process model is evaluated in the course of process planning and production scheduling. Process models are created on the basis of form feature oriented part model and workshop environment model. Petri net objects are created using knowledge on manufacturing process object and process structure. The paper is organized as follows. First, aims of the research are outlined and the characteristics of manufacturing process models of this type are summarized. Next, the principle of modeling the structure of the process model and the process model entities are detailed. Following this, the generation procedure of the process model is presented. Finally, typical examples of manufacturing process model entities for a prismatic part machined in a flexible manufacturing system are showed.
引用
收藏
页码:824 / 828
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Manufacturing feature recognition method for the generation of multiple process plans
    Ando, K
    Muljadi, H
    Ogawa, M
    JSME INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL SERIES C-MECHANICAL SYSTEMS MACHINE ELEMENTS AND MANUFACTURING, 2005, 48 (02) : 269 - 277
  • [42] Manufacturing feature recognition method for the generation of multiple process plans
    Muljadi, Hendry
    Ando, Koichi
    Ogawa, Makoto
    Nippon Kikai Gakkai Ronbunshu, C Hen/Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Part C, 2003, 69 (08): : 2213 - 2221
  • [43] Development of next-generation manufacturing and production process of dies
    Iwabuchi, A
    JOURNAL OF JAPANESE SOCIETY OF TRIBOLOGISTS, 2003, 48 (05) : 350 - 355
  • [44] Sulfur flow analysis for new generation steel manufacturing process
    Chang-qing Hu
    Chun-xia Zhang
    Xiao-wei Han
    Rui-yu Yin
    Journal of Iron and Steel Research International, 2008, 15 : 12 - 15
  • [45] Sulfur Flow Analysis for New Generation Steel Manufacturing Process
    HU Chang-qing~1 ZHANG Chun-xia~2 HAN Xiao-wei~1 YIN Rui-yu~2 1. College of Metallurgy and Energy
    2. State Key Laboratory of Advanced Steel Process and Products
    JournalofIronandSteelResearch(International), 2008, (04) : 12 - 15
  • [46] Generation of welded-part geometry with manufacturing process rules
    Yoon, TaeSung
    Miyoshi, Kazuto
    Suzuki, Hiromasa
    Kimura, Fumihiko
    Seimitsu Kogaku Kaishi/Journal of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering, 1997, 63 (03): : 353 - 357
  • [47] REPRESENTATION OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS IN TERMS OF ENTITIES AND RELATIONSHIPS
    BEAUMARIAGE, T
    ROBERTS, C
    BAWEJA, G
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 1995, 8 (01) : 43 - 53
  • [48] Revisiting the concept of generation CE - Generation of Cognitive Entities
    Baranyi, Peter
    Csapo, Adam B.
    2015 6TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE INFOCOMMUNICATIONS (COGINFOCOM), 2015, : 583 - 586
  • [49] Automatic Process Intermediate Model Generation in Process Planning
    Zhang, Xu
    Liang, Chao
    Li, Wei-yu
    RESEARCH IN MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES, PTS 1-3, 2014, 835-836 : 1436 - 1443
  • [50] Conceptual Model for the Generation of Performance Measures in Manufacturing Firms
    Quezada, Luis E.
    Cordova, F.
    Palominos, P.
    O'Brien, Christopher
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2006, 3 (02) : 21 - 34