Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing Position with a Rebound Tonometer

被引:14
|
作者
De Bernardo, Maddalena [1 ]
Borrelli, Maria [2 ]
Cembalo, Giovanni [1 ]
Rosa, Nicola [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salerno, Dept Med Surg & Dent, I-84081 Baronissi, Italy
[2] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Dept Ophthalmol, D-40204 Dusseldorf, Germany
来源
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | 2019年 / 55卷 / 10期
关键词
intraocular pressure; Icare PRO; standing position; sitting position; supine position; EPISCLERAL VENOUS-PRESSURE; BODY POSITION; APPLANATION TONOMETRY; GLAUCOMA PROGRESSION; RISK-FACTOR; FLUCTUATION; PNEUMATONOMETER; DIFFERENCE; BLOOD; HEAD;
D O I
10.3390/medicina55100701
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: It has been established that body position can play an important role in intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuation. IOP has been previously shown to increase significantly when lying down, relative to sitting; this type of investigation has not been extensively reported for the standing (ST) position. Therefore, this study aims to look for eventual significant IOP changes while ST, sitting, and lying down. Materials and Methods: An Icare PRO was used to measure the IOP of 120 eyes of 60 healthy individuals, with age ranging from 21 to 55 years (mean 29.22 +/- 9.12 years), in sitting, supine and ST positions; IOP was measured again, 5 min after standing (ST-5m). Results: Mean IOP difference between sitting and ST position was 0.39 +/- 1.93 mmHg (95% CI: 0.04 to 0.74 mmHg) (p = 0.027); between sitting and ST-5m, it was -0.48 +/- 1.79 mmHg (95% CI: -0.8 to -0.16 mmHg) (p = 0.004); between the sitting and supine position, it was -1.16 +/- 1.9 mmHg (95% CI: -1.5 to -0.82 mmHg) (p < 0.001); between the supine and ST position, it was 1.55 +/- 2.04 mmHg (95% CI: 1.18 to 1.92 mmHg) (p < 0.001); between supine and ST-5m, it was 0.68 +/- 1.87 mmHg (95% CI: 0.34 to 1.02 mmHg) (p < 0.001); and between ST-5m and ST, it was 0.94 +/- 1.95 mmHg (95% CI: 0.58 to 1.29 mmHg) (p < 0.001). Mean axial eye length was 24.45 mm (95% CI: 24.22 to 24.69 mm), and mean central corneal thickness was 535.30 mu m (95% CI: 529.44 to 541.19 mu m). Conclusion: Increased IOP in the ST-5m position suggests that IOP measurements should be performed in this position too. The detection of higher IOP values in the ST-5m position than in the sitting one, may explain the presence of glaucoma damage or progression in apparently normal-tension or compensated patients.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Intraocular Pressure Measurement Using Rebound Tonometer for Deviated Angles and Positions in Human Eyes
    Takenaka, Joji
    Mochizuki, Hideki
    Kunihara, Eriko
    Tanaka, Junko
    Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2012, 37 (02) : 109 - 114
  • [42] The Difference in Intraocular Pressure before and after Visual Field Test Measured by Rebound Tonometer
    Park, Joong Hyun
    Kim, Jin Young
    Lee, Eun Kyoung
    Lee, Hye Jin
    Jeong, Jin Ho
    Lee, Sang-Yoon
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 61 (01): : 78 - 85
  • [43] Intraocular pressure measurement over soft contact lens by rebound tonometer: a comparative study
    Nacaroglu, Senay Asik
    Un, Emine Seker
    Ersoz, Mehmet Giray
    Tasci, Yelda
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 8 (03) : 540 - 543
  • [44] COMPARATIVE MEASUREMENTS OF INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE WITH THE NON-CONTACT TONOMETER AND THE GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER
    LANGMANN, G
    SCHUHMANN, G
    SCHWAIGER, W
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 1985, 187 (05) : 345 - 347
  • [45] Comparing the intraocular pressure values obtained with a rebound tonometer (TONOVET Plus) and an indentation tonometer (IOPvet) in dogs with and without ocular disease
    Michaud, Bertrand
    Lesne, Fabien
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2024, 194 (12) : no
  • [46] Effectiveness of the ICare rebound tonometer in patients with overestimated intraocular pressure due to tight orbit syndrome
    Y. K. Lee
    J. Y. Lee
    J. I. Moon
    M. H. Park
    Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, 2014, 58 : 496 - 502
  • [47] The ability of patients to measure their own intraocular pressure using a rebound tonometer and the influence of corneal biomechanics
    Tatham, Andrew J.
    Brown, Lyndsay
    Pronin, Savva
    Megaw, Roly
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2018, 59 (09)
  • [48] Assessment of intraocular pressure measurement between Goldman applanation tonometer, rebound tonometer, non-contact tonometer, and its correlation with central corneal thickness
    Porwal, Amit C.
    Shrishrimal, Meghna
    Punamia, Ravin P.
    Mathew, Bennet Chacko
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 71 (05) : 1927 - 1931
  • [49] Measurement of intraocular pressure (iop) without anesthetic: Pulsair 3000 and impact probe (rebound) tonometer
    Kontiola, AI
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2002, 43 : U969 - U969
  • [50] Comparability of Icare Pro Rebound Tonometer with Goldmann Applanation and Noncontact Tonometer in a Wide Range of Intraocular Pressure and Central Corneal Thickness
    Tamcelik, Nevbahar
    Atalay, Eray
    Cicik, Erdogan
    Ozkok, Ahmet
    OPHTHALMIC RESEARCH, 2015, 54 (01) : 18 - 25