共 50 条
A guide to prospective meta-analysis
被引:87
|作者:
Seidler, Anna Lene
[1
]
Hunter, Kylie E.
[1
]
Cheyne, Saskia
[1
]
Ghersi, Davina
[1
,2
]
Berlin, Jesse A.
[3
]
Askie, Lisa
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Sydney, NHMRC Clin Trials Ctr, Locked Bag 77, Camperdown, NSW 1450, Australia
[2] Natl Hlth & Med Res Council, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Johnson & Johnson, Titusville, NJ USA
来源:
基金:
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词:
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS;
BIAS;
D O I:
10.1136/bmj.l5342
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
In a prospective meta-analysis (PMA), study selection criteria, hypotheses, and analyses are specified before the results of the studies related to the PMA research question are known, reducing many of the problems associated with a traditional (retrospective) meta-analysis. PMAs have many advantages: they can help reduce research waste and bias, and they are adaptive, efficient, and collaborative. Despite an increase in the number of health research articles labelled as PMAs, the methodology remains rare, novel, and often misunderstood. This paper provides detailed guidance on how to address the key elements for conducting a high quality PMA with a case study to illustrate each step.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文