Prediction of Water Saturation from Well Log Data by Machine Learning Algorithms: Boosting and Super Learner

被引:24
|
作者
Hadavimoghaddam, Fahimeh [1 ]
Ostadhassan, Mehdi [2 ,3 ]
Sadri, Mohammad Ali [4 ]
Bondarenko, Tatiana [5 ]
Chebyshev, Igor [6 ]
Semnani, Amir [7 ]
机构
[1] Gubkin Natl Univ Oil & Gas, Dept Oil Field Dev & Operat, Moscow 119991, Russia
[2] Northeast Petr Univ, Key Lab Continental Shale Hydrocarbon Accumulat &, Minist Educ, Daqing 163318, Peoples R China
[3] Amirkabir Univ Technol, Dept Petr Engn, Tehran 1591634311, Iran
[4] Skolkovo Inst Sci & Technol Skoltech, Moscow 121205, Russia
[5] PetroGuide LLC, Moscow 143005, Russia
[6] Gazpromneft Sci & Technol Ctr, St Petersburg 190000, Russia
[7] Southwest Petr Univ, Sch Geosci & Technol, Chengdu 610500, Peoples R China
关键词
well log DATA; water saturation; machine learning; boosting; super learner; PERMEABILITY; POROSITY;
D O I
10.3390/jmse9060666
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Intelligent predictive methods have the power to reliably estimate water saturation (S-w) compared to conventional experimental methods commonly performed by petrphysicists. However, due to nonlinearity and uncertainty in the data set, the prediction might not be accurate. There exist new machine learning (ML) algorithms such as gradient boosting techniques that have shown significant success in other disciplines yet have not been examined for S-w prediction or other reservoir or rock properties in the petroleum industry. To bridge the literature gap, in this study, for the first time, a total of five ML code programs that belong to the family of Super Learner along with boosting algorithms: XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, AdaBoost, are developed to predict water saturation without relying on the resistivity log data. This is important since conventional methods of water saturation prediction that rely on resistivity log can become problematic in particular formations such as shale or tight carbonates. Thus, to do so, two datasets were constructed by collecting several types of well logs (Gamma, density, neutron, sonic, PEF, and without PEF) to evaluate the robustness and accuracy of the models by comparing the results with laboratory-measured data. It was found that Super Learner and XGBoost produced the highest accurate output (R-2: 0.999 and 0.993, respectively), and with considerable distance, Catboost and LightGBM were ranked third and fourth, respectively. Ultimately, both XGBoost and Super Learner produced negligible errors but the latest is considered as the best amongst all.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation and Development of a Predictive Model for Geophysical Well Log Data Analysis and Reservoir Characterization: Machine Learning Applications to Lithology Prediction
    Aditya Mishra
    Anjali Sharma
    Atul Kumar Patidar
    Natural Resources Research, 2022, 31 : 3195 - 3222
  • [42] Exploratory Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for Total Organic Carbon Prediction Using Well-Log Data of Kolmani Field
    Longman, Fodio S.
    Balogun, Habeeb
    Ojulari, Rasheed O.
    Olatomiwa, Olaniyi J.
    Balarabe, Husaini J.
    Edeh, Ifeanyichukwu S.
    Joshua, Olabisi O.
    2024 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION SYSTEMS, ICPRS, 2024,
  • [43] Potential for Prediction of Water Saturation Distribution in Reservoirs Utilizing Machine Learning Methods
    Zhang, Qitao
    Wei, Chenji
    Wang, Yuhe
    Du, Shuyi
    Zhou, Yuanchun
    Song, Hongqing
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (19)
  • [44] Evaluation and Development of a Predictive Model for Geophysical Well Log Data Analysis and Reservoir Characterization: Machine Learning Applications to Lithology Prediction
    Mishra, Aditya
    Sharma, Anjali
    Patidar, Atul Kumar
    NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (06) : 3195 - 3222
  • [45] Adaptive spatiotemporal neural networks based on machine learning for missing well-log prediction
    Chen, Bingyang
    Zeng, Xingjie
    Fan, Lulu
    Li, Kun
    Zhang, Weishan
    Cao, Shaohua
    Wang, YanXin
    Du, Ruishan
    Chen, Tao
    Zhang, Baoyu
    Zhou, Jiehan
    GEOPHYSICS, 2023, 88 (06) : V431 - V443
  • [46] Lithofacies Prediction from Well Log Data Based on Deep Learning: A Case Study from Southern Sichuan, China
    Shi, Yu
    Liao, Junqiao
    Gan, Lu
    Tang, Rongjiang
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (18):
  • [47] Failure Prediction of Municipal Water Pipes Using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Wei Liu
    Binhao Wang
    Zhaoyang Song
    Water Resources Management, 2022, 36 : 1271 - 1285
  • [48] Evaluating different machine learning algorithms for snow water equivalent prediction
    Mehdi Vafakhah
    Ali Nasiri Khiavi
    Saeid Janizadeh
    Hojatolah Ganjkhanlo
    Earth Science Informatics, 2022, 15 : 2431 - 2445
  • [49] Water Quality Index (WQI) Prediction Using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Kularbphettong, Kunyanuth
    Waraporn, Phanu
    Raksuntorn, Nareenart
    Vivhivanives, Rujijan
    Sangsuwon, Chanyapat
    Boonseng, Chongrag
    2023 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, CSCI 2023, 2023, : 383 - 387
  • [50] Synthetic Slowness Shear Well-Log Prediction Using Supervised Machine Learning Models
    Tamoto, Hugo
    Contreras, Rodrigo Colnago
    dos Santos, Franciso Lledo
    Viana, Monique Simplicio
    Gioria, Rafael dos Santos
    Carneiro, Cleyton de Carvalho
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND SOFT COMPUTING, ICAISC 2022, PT I, 2023, 13588 : 115 - 130