Incidence, Classification, and Risk Factors for Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Single Stem: A Retrospective Study

被引:31
|
作者
Liu, Bo [1 ]
Ma, Wenhui [1 ]
Li, Huijie [1 ]
Wu, Tao [1 ]
Huo, Jia [1 ]
Han, Yongtai [1 ]
机构
[1] Third Hosp Hebei Med Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 139 Ziqiang Rd, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2019年 / 34卷 / 07期
关键词
arthroplasty; periprosthetic fracture; complication; risk factor; hip; femoral stem; FEMUR FRACTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.031
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The collum femoris preserving (CFP) stem was a specially designed femoral neck preserving component. The incidence, classification, and risk factors for intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures with this special stem remain unclear. Methods: This was a retrospective study. We analyzed the clinical and radiological data of all patients who underwent primary hip arthroplasty with a CFP stem in our hospital between January 2006 and November 2018. Demographic characteristics and radiological features were obtained from the medical records and the Picture Archiving and Communication System, respectively. The incidence, Vancouver classification, and risk factors for intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures were identified. Results: A total of 1633 hips were included. The incidence rate of periprosthetic femoral fractures in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with a CFP stem was 3.2%. According to the Vancouver classification, there were 24 patients (45.3%) with Vancouver type A fractures, 27 patients (50.9%) with Vancouver type B fractures, and 2 patients (3.8%) with Vancouver type C fractures. Five independent risk (protective) factors were found, including surgical history (odds ratio [OR] = 3.275, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.192-8.997), neck-shaft angle (OR = 1.104, 95% CI = 1.058-1.152), neck length preserved (OR = 0.913, 95% CI = 0.850-0.980), canal flare index (OR = 0.636, 95% CI = 0.413-0.980), and bone mineral density (OR = 0.083, 95% CI = 0.016-0.417). Conclusion: The detailed characteristics of intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures in patients who received a CFP stem were identified in this study. Cracks of the femoral neck and fractures on the front side of the proximal femur were more common in patients with CFP stems. As a kind of a femoral neck preserving stem, the anatomical features (eg, neck-shaft angle, preserving length) of the remaining femoral neck might influence the incidence and characteristics of intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures in patients with CFP stems. (c) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1400 / 1411
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THE UNCEMENTED TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY - INTRAOPERATIVE FEMORAL FRACTURES
    FITZGERALD, RH
    BRINDLEY, GW
    KAVANAGH, BF
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1988, (235) : 61 - 66
  • [32] Does Femoral Stem Design Influence Periprosthetic Fracture Incidence and Morphology in Total Hip Arthroplasty?
    Cochrane, Niall H.
    Stauffer, Taylor P.
    Wu, Christine J.
    Holland, Christopher T.
    Seyler, Thorsten M.
    Bolognesi, Michael P.
    Ryan, Sean P.
    Wellman, Samuel S.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2025, 40 (04): : 1062 - 1067
  • [33] Higher Annual Total Hip Arthroplasty Volume Decreases the Risk of Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femur Fractures
    Klag, Elizabeth A.
    Heil, Hailey O.
    Wesemann, Luke D.
    Charters, Michael A.
    North, Wayne T.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2024, 39 (01): : 138 - 144
  • [34] Periprosthetic femoral fractures - Classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register
    Lindahl, H
    Malchau, H
    Herberts, P
    Garellick, G
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (07): : 857 - 865
  • [35] Treatment options for proximal periprosthetic femoral fractures in Total Hip Arthroplasty: a single center experience
    Marino, S.
    Giuliani, A.
    De Mauro, D.
    Rovere, G.
    Smakaj, A.
    Sassara, G. M.
    Are, L.
    Maccauro, G.
    Liuzza, F.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 26 : 113 - 118
  • [36] Periprosthetic fractures in total hip arthroplasty: an epidemiologic study
    Roope Sarvilinna
    Heini S. A. Huhtala
    Timo J. S. Puolakka
    Juha K. Nevalainen
    K. Jorma J. Pajamäki
    International Orthopaedics, 2003, 27 : 359 - 361
  • [37] Periprosthetic fractures in total hip arthroplasty:: an epidemiologic study
    Sarvilinna, R
    Huhtala, HSA
    Puolakka, TJS
    Nevalainen, JK
    Pajamäki, KJJ
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2003, 27 (06) : 359 - 361
  • [38] Incidence of Distal Femoral Periprosthetic Fractures after Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Welch, Tyler
    Iorio, Richard
    Marcantonio, Andrew J.
    Kain, Michael S. H.
    Tilzey, John F.
    Specht, Lawrence M.
    Healy, William L.
    BULLETIN OF THE HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES, 2016, 74 (04): : 287 - 292
  • [39] Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty with femoral component revision
    Springer, BD
    Berry, DJ
    Lewallen, DG
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 85A (11): : 2156 - 2162
  • [40] High mortality rate following periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty. A multicenter retrospective study
    Moreta, Jesus
    Uriarte, Iker
    Bidea, Inigo
    Foruria, Xabier
    Legarreta, Maria Jose
    Etxebarria-Foronda, Inigo
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2021, 52 (10): : 3022 - 3027