Financial conflict resolution model in BOT contracts using bargaining game theory

被引:8
|
作者
Bayat, Morteza [1 ]
Khanzadi, Mostafa [1 ]
Nasirzadeh, Farnad [2 ]
Chavoshian, Ali [3 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Narmak, Iran
[2] Deakin Univ, Dept Architecture & Built Environm, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[3] Reg Ctr Urban Water Management RCUWM Tehran Auspi, Tehran, Iran
来源
CONSTRUCTION INNOVATION-ENGLAND | 2020年 / 20卷 / 01期
关键词
Finance; Concession; Equity; Contract; Bargaining; BOT; CAPITAL STRUCTURE OPTIMIZATION; REASONABLE CONCESSION PERIOD; TRANSFER ROAD PROJECTS; SYSTEM; COST;
D O I
10.1108/CI-12-2018-0099
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Purpose This study aims to determine the optimal value of concession period length in combination with capital structure in build-operate-transfer (BOT) contracts, based on direct negotiation procurement and considering the conflicting financial interests of different parties involved in the project. Design/methodology/approach The financial model of a BOT project is developed considering all the influencing factors. Then, fuzzy set theory is used to take into account the existing risks and uncertainties. Bilateral bargaining game based on alternating-offers protocol is applied between the government and the sponsor to divide project financial benefit considering the lender's requirements. Finally, concession period and equity level will be determined simultaneously according to the sponsor's and government's share of project financial benefit and the lender's requirements. Findings The proposed model is implemented on a real case study, and a fair and efficient agreement on concession period length and capital structure is achieved between the government and the sponsor considering the lender's requirements. It is revealed that being the first proposer in the bargaining process will affect the concession period length; however, it will not affect the equity level. Moreover, it is shown that considering income tax as a part of government's financial benefit increases the length of concession period. Originality/value By investigation of previous studies, it is revealed that none of them can determine the optimal value of concession period length and capital structure simultaneously considering the BOT negotiation process and different financial interests of parties involved in the project. The proposed model presents a new approach to determine the financial variables considering the conflicting interests of involved parties. The other novelty aspects of the presented model are as follows: introducing a new approach for calculating the sponsor and the government's share of project financial benefit that will affect the determination of the concession period length and considering the effect of existing risks and uncertainties on final agreement between the involved parties using fuzzy set theory.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 42
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Application of non-cooperative dynamic game theory for groundwater conflict resolution
    Nazari, Sara
    Ahmadi, Azadeh
    Rad, Saeed Kamrani
    Ebrahimi, Babak
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 270 (270)
  • [32] Behavioral Analysis in International Business Negotiations Based on the Bargaining Model of Game Theory
    Zhang, Bei
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS, 2021, 2021
  • [33] Graph Model for Conflict Resolution With Internal Consensus Reaching and External Game
    Zhang, Hengjie
    Wang, Fang
    Dong, Yucheng
    Chiclana, Francisco
    Herrera-Viedma, Enrique
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2024, 54 (10): : 6265 - 6279
  • [34] Optimum Integrated Design of Mechanical Structure/Controller using Bargaining Game Theory
    Iwai, Yoji
    Konishi, Yasuo
    Araki, Nozomu
    Ishigaki, Hiroyuki
    2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, AUTOMATION AND SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-4, 2008, : 24 - 29
  • [35] Decentralized Cloud Service Composition Formalization Using the Bargaining Game Model
    Wang, Xiaogang
    2017 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS AND INFORMATICS (ICSAI), 2017, : 665 - 670
  • [36] An Ultimatum Game Theory Based Approach for Basin Scale Water Allocation Conflict Resolution
    Ershad Oftadeh
    Mojtaba Shourian
    Bahram Saghafian
    Water Resources Management, 2017, 31 : 4293 - 4308
  • [37] Modelling and Evaluation of a Game-Theory approach for Airborne Conflict Resolution in Omnet plus
    Masci, Paolo
    Tedeschi, Alessandra
    DEPEND: 2009 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DEPENDABILITY, 2009, : 162 - +
  • [38] An Ultimatum Game Theory Based Approach for Basin Scale Water Allocation Conflict Resolution
    Oftadeh, Ershad
    Shourian, Mojtaba
    Saghafian, Bahram
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2017, 31 (13) : 4293 - 4308
  • [39] Profit allocation model of cooperative distributed energy resources based on bargaining game theory
    Qin T.
    Liu H.
    Wang J.
    Fang W.
    Feng Z.
    Dianli Zidonghua Shebei/Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2019, 39 (01): : 134 - 140
  • [40] An Analysis of Countries' Bargaining Power Derived from the Natural Gas Transportation System Using a Cooperative Game Theory Model
    Roman, Mihai Daniel
    Stanculescu, Diana Mihaela
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (12)