Methodology for supply chain disruption analysis

被引:178
|
作者
Wu, T.
Blackhurst, J.
O'Grady, P.
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Logist Operat & MIS, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Seamans Ctr, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
supply chain disruptions; supply chain design; network model;
D O I
10.1080/00207540500362138
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Given the size, complexity and dynamic nature of many supply chains, there is a need to understand the impact of disruptions on the operation of the system. This paper presents a network-based modelling methodology to determine how changes or disruptions propagate in supply chains and how those changes or disruptions affect the supply chain system. Understanding the propagation of disruptions and gaining insight into the operational performance of a supply chain system under the duress of an unexpected change can lead to a better understanding of supply chain disruptions and how to lessen their effects. The modelling approach presented, Disruption Analysis Network (DA_NET), models how changes disseminate through a supply chain system and calculates the impact of the attributes by determining the states that are reachable from a given initial marking in a supply chain network. This ability will permit better management of the supply chain and thus will allow an organization to offer quicker response times to the customer, lower costs throughout the chain, and to the end customer higher levels of flexibility and agility, lower inventories throughout the chain (both with work-in-process and inventories), lower levels of obsolescence and a reduced bullwhip effect throughout the chain. This is of particular benefit in large-scale systems, since it can give the user the ability to perform detailed analysis of a dynamic system without the computational burden of a full-scale execution of the model. Consequently, the model may then be segmented to evaluate only the portions or sub-networks that are affected by changes in an initial marking.
引用
收藏
页码:1665 / 1682
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Modeling supply chain disruption risk management
    Kungwalsong, K.
    Ravindran, A. Ravi
    62nd IIE Annual Conference and Expo 2012, 2012, : 3222 - 3231
  • [32] Effect of the Black Box of Supply Chain Resilience on Supply Chain Performance with Disruption Considerations
    Juan, Shih-Jung
    Lin, Woo-Tsong
    2020 IEEE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND APPLICATIONS (ICIEA 2020), 2020, : 430 - 435
  • [33] A portfolio approach to supply chain disruption management
    Sawik, Tadeusz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2017, 55 (07) : 1970 - 1991
  • [34] Supply chain disruption recovery strategies for measuring profitability and resilience in supply and demand disruption scenarios
    Li, Yaru
    Yuan, Yanhong
    RAIRO-OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024, 58 (01) : 591 - 612
  • [35] A quantitative model for disruption mitigation in a supply chain
    Paul, Sanjoy Kumar
    Sarker, Ruhul
    Essam, Daryl
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 257 (03) : 881 - 895
  • [36] Literature review on disruption recovery in the supply chain
    Ivanov, Dmitry
    Dolgui, Alexandre
    Sokolov, Boris
    Ivanova, Marina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2017, 55 (20) : 6158 - 6174
  • [37] Modeling Disruption Propagation in a Complex Supply Chain
    Tan, P. S.
    Lee, S. G.
    Tan, C. S.
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2016, : 154 - 158
  • [38] STABILITY OF THE SUPPLY CHAIN BASED ON DISRUPTION CLASSIFICATION
    Hu, Hui
    Shi, Lei
    Ma, Hai
    Ran, Bin
    TEHNICKI VJESNIK-TECHNICAL GAZETTE, 2017, 24 (04): : 1187 - 1195
  • [39] Cost Sharing in the Prevention of Supply Chain Disruption
    Wang, Wen
    Xue, Kelei
    Sun, Xiaochen
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2017, 2017
  • [40] An assessment of supply chain disruption mitigation strategies
    Kamalahmadi, Masoud
    Parast, Mahour Mellat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2017, 184 : 210 - 230