Impact of bolus application of low-dose hydrocortisone on glycemic control in septic shock patients

被引:41
|
作者
Weber-Carstens, Steffen [1 ]
Deja, Maria [1 ]
Bercker, Sven [1 ]
Dimroth, Anna [1 ]
Ahlers, Olaf [1 ]
Kaisers, Udo [1 ]
Keh, Didier [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Berlin, Clin Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Charite, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
关键词
hydrocortisone; septic shock; blood glucose; glycemic control; glucose variability; bolus application;
D O I
10.1007/s00134-007-0540-3
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectibe: To determine whether glycemic control is less feasible when hydrocortisone is given as a bolus compared with continuous application in septic shock patients. Design: Observational prospective pilot study. Setting: Fourteen-bed surgical university hospital ICU. Patients: Sixteen consecutive patients with septic shock receiving a continuous infusion of 200 mg hydrocortisone/day and an infusion regime of insulin keeping blood glucose below 150 mg/dl. Intervention: Blood glucose and insulin infusion were adjusted to steady state before intervention. At baseline, the continuous hydrocortisone infusion was replaced with a single bolus of 50 mg hydrocortisone. During a subsequent 6-h period, blood glucose was monitored hourly and insulin infusion was kept constant. Afterwards, hydrocortisone application and adjustment of blood glucose was resumed according to standard treatment. Results: Mean blood glucose in steady state at baseline immediately prior to intervention was 128 mg/dl (range 114-141 mg/dl; 95% confidence interval). After bolus injection of hydrocortisone, blood glucose increased significantly within 6 h with peak levels of 154 mg/dl (range 132-178 mg/dl; p < 0.01). Blood glucose returned to baseline with restoration of continuous hydrocortisone infusion. There were marked inter-individual variations with peak glucose values up to 254 mg/dl, but no significant difference in intra-individual glucose variability before and after bolus injection of hydrocortisone. Conclusions: Bolus injections of hydrocortisone may induce significant increases of blood glucose in patients with septic shock. The individual response is highly variable and we speculate that repetitive boluses would induce marked undulation of blood glucose. In terms of glycemic-control strategies, a continuous infusion of hydrocortisone seems to be preferable.
引用
收藏
页码:730 / 733
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Plasma cortisol levels before and during "low-dose" hydrocortisone therapy and their relationship to hemodynamic improvement in patients with septic shock
    Oppert, M
    Reinicke, A
    Gräf, KJ
    Barckow, D
    Frei, U
    Eckardt, KU
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 26 (12) : 1747 - 1755
  • [22] Impact of Low-Dose Hydrocortisone on the Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Septic Shock: A Propensity Score-Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Cohort Study
    Launey, Yoann
    Lasocki, Sigismond
    Asehnoune, Karim
    Gaudriot, Baptiste
    Chassier, Claire
    Cinotti, Raphael
    Le Maguet, Pascale
    Laksiri, Leila
    Mimoz, Olivier
    Tawa, Audrey
    Nesseler, Nicolas
    Malledant, Yannick
    Perrot, Bastien
    Seguin, Philippe
    JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 34 (03) : 238 - 244
  • [23] Low-dose and high-dose corticotropin stimulation test in septic shock patients
    J Schweitzer
    C Broux
    J Brun
    P Lavagne
    J Payen
    C Jacquot
    Critical Care, 9 (Suppl 1):
  • [24] Effect of Continuous Infusion vs Bolus Dose of Hydrocortisone in Septic Shock: A Prospective Randomized Study
    Salhotra, Rashmi
    Sharahudeen, Ajeeb
    Tyagi, Asha
    Rautela, Rajesh S.
    Kemprai, Rajit
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 28 (09) : 837 - 841
  • [25] Hydrocortisone Continuous Infusion Versus Bolus Dose on Glycemic Control in Critically Ill Subjects
    Coles, Laura L.
    Forehand, Christy C.
    Quidley, April M.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2021, 34 (01) : 35 - 39
  • [26] Low-dose vasopressin in the treatment of septic shock in sheep
    Sun, QH
    Dimopoulos, G
    Nguyen, DN
    Tu, Z
    Nagy, N
    Hoang, AD
    Rogiers, P
    De Backer, D
    Vincent, JL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 168 (04) : 481 - 486
  • [27] Hydrocortisone for Septic Shock, Bolus or Infusion: Pro, Con, May be
    Todi, Subhash
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 28 (09) : 816 - 817
  • [28] Low-dose vasopressin in the treatment of vasodilatory septic shock
    Malay, MB
    Ashton, RC
    Landry, DW
    Townsend, RN
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1999, 47 (04): : 699 - 703
  • [29] Low-dose immunoglobulin G is not associated with mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock
    Yusuke Iizuka
    Masamitsu Sanui
    Yusuke Sasabuchi
    Alan Kawarai Lefor
    Mineji Hayakawa
    Shinjiro Saito
    Shigehiko Uchino
    Kazuma Yamakawa
    Daisuke Kudo
    Kohei Takimoto
    Toshihiko Mayumi
    Takeo Azuhata
    Fumihito Ito
    Shodai Yoshihiro
    Katsura Hayakawa
    Tsuyoshi Nakashima
    Takayuki Ogura
    Eiichiro Noda
    Yoshihiko Nakamura
    Ryosuke Sekine
    Yoshiaki Yoshikawa
    Motohiro Sekino
    Keiko Ueno
    Yuko Okuda
    Masayuki Watanabe
    Akihito Tampo
    Nobuyuki Saito
    Yuya Kitai
    Hiroki Takahashi
    Iwao Kobayashi
    Yutaka Kondo
    Wataru Matsunaga
    Sho Nachi
    Toru Miike
    Hiroshi Takahashi
    Shuhei Takauji
    Kensuke Umakoshi
    Takafumi Todaka
    Hiroshi Kodaira
    Kohkichi Andoh
    Takehiko Kasai
    Yoshiaki Iwashita
    Hideaki Arai
    Masato Murata
    Masahiro Yamane
    Kazuhiro Shiga
    Naoto Hori
    Critical Care, 21
  • [30] RENAL EFFECTS OF LOW-DOSE DOPAMINE IN PATIENTS WITH SEPTIC SHOCK TREATED WITH NOREPINEPHRINE
    LHERM, T
    TROCHE, G
    PASSARD, A
    ZAZZO, JF
    BENHAMOU, D
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 72 : 109 - 109