Interspecific interactions, population variation, and environmental forcing in the context of the community

被引:4
|
作者
Porzig, Elizabeth L. [1 ,2 ]
Seavy, Nathaniel E. [1 ]
Eadie, John M. [2 ]
Humple, Diana L. [1 ]
Geupel, Geoffrey R. [1 ]
Gardali, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Point Blue Conservat Sci, 3820 Cypress Dr 11, Petaluma, CA 94954 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Wildlife Fish & Conservat Biol, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA
来源
ECOSPHERE | 2016年 / 7卷 / 06期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
community; environmental change; hierarchical model; species interactions; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS; DYNAMICS; COMPETITION; RANGE;
D O I
10.1002/ecs2.1349
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We evaluated the contribution of interspecific interactions, intraspecific processes, and environmental forcing to variation in species' abundance in a habitat undergoing rapid successional change. We applied a Bayesian hierarchical approach to a 29-yr time series of territory density of seven landbird species at a site in coastal California where secondary plant succession has occurred. We found that interspecific interactions were the least important driver in our system, explaining between 0% and 5% of variation. The combined effects of vegetation and rainfall variation explained 6% to 30% of variation in species trends. Intraspecific processes explained between 0% and 39% of variation. Between 27% and 90% of variation was attributed to unexplained variation. Our results demonstrate that in the system studied, interspecific interactions among landbirds are relatively unimportant. These results suggest that in some cases it may be valid to model projections of individual populations to predict community responses to future conditions; however, this conclusion should be interpreted with caution because interspecific interactions in our community did not include novel interactions that could result from distributional shifts in species ranges.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Interspecific interactions are conditional on temperature in an Appalachian stream salamander community
    Hoffacker, Mary Lou
    Cecala, Kristen K.
    Ennen, Joshua R.
    Mitchell, Shawna M.
    Davenport, Jon M.
    OECOLOGIA, 2018, 188 (02) : 623 - 631
  • [22] INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTIONS BETWEEN BLOOD PARASITES IN A WILD RODENT COMMUNITY
    TURNER, CMR
    COX, FEG
    ANNALS OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND PARASITOLOGY, 1985, 79 (04): : 463 - 465
  • [23] ANALYSIS OF INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTIONS IN A COASTAL PLANT COMMUNITY - A PERTURBATION APPROACH
    SILANDER, JA
    ANTONOVICS, J
    NATURE, 1982, 298 (5874) : 557 - 560
  • [24] Evolution of Neogene Mammals in Eurasia: Environmental Forcing and Biotic Interactions
    Fortelius, Mikael
    Eronen, Jussi T.
    Kaya, Ferhat
    Tang, Hui
    Raia, Pasquale
    Puolamaki, Kai
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCES, VOL 42, 2014, 42 : 579 - 604
  • [25] Response of microbial community structure to environmental forcing in the Arabian Sea
    Campbell, L
    Landry, MR
    Constantinou, J
    Nolla, HA
    Brown, SL
    Liu, H
    Caron, DA
    DEEP-SEA RESEARCH PART II-TOPICAL STUDIES IN OCEANOGRAPHY, 1998, 45 (10-11) : 2301 - 2325
  • [27] Community mobilization in the context of population aging
    Chee, KH
    SOCIOLOGICAL SPECTRUM, 2006, 26 (01) : 43 - 61
  • [28] Interspecific interactions explain variation in the duration of paternal care in the burying beetle
    De Gasperin, Ornela
    Duarte, Ana
    Kilner, Rebecca M.
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2015, 109 : 199 - 207
  • [29] The environmental context for water quality variation in Scotland
    Langan, SJ
    Soulsby, C
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 265 (1-3) : 7 - 14
  • [30] Interspecific variation in the phenology of advertisement calling in a temperate Australian frog community
    Heard, Geoffrey W.
    Canessa, Stefano
    Parris, Kirsten M.
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2015, 5 (18): : 3927 - 3938