A systematic and practical method for selecting systems engineering tools

被引:0
|
作者
Munck, Allan [1 ,2 ]
Madsen, Jan [2 ]
机构
[1] GN Hearing AS, Dept Syst Engn, Ballerup, Denmark
[2] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Appl Math & Comp Sci, Sect Embedded Syst Engn, Lyngby, Denmark
关键词
SOFTWARE PACKAGES; CRITERIA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The complexity of many types of systems has grown considerably over the last decades. Using appropriate systems engineering tools therefore becomes increasingly important. Starting the tool selection process can be intimidating because organizations often only have a vague idea about what they need. The tremendous number of available tools makes it difficult to get an overview and identify the best choice. Selecting wrong tools due to inappropriate analysis can have severe impact on the success of the company. This paper presents a systematic method for selecting systems engineering tools based on thorough analyses of the actual needs and the available tools. Grouping needs into categories, allow us to obtain a comprehensive set of requirements for the tools. The entire model-based systems engineering discipline was categorized for a modeling tool case to enable development of a tool specification. Correlating requirements and tool capabilities, enables us to identify the best tool for singletool scenarios or the best set of tools for multi-tool scenarios. In both scenarios, we use gap analysis to prevent selection of infeasible tools. We used the method to select a traceability tool that has been in successful operation since 2013 at GN Hearing. We further utilized the method to select a set of tools that we used on pilot cases at GN Hearing for modeling, simulating and formally verifying embedded systems.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 208
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Smart Tools in Software Engineering: A Systematic Mapping Study
    Savchenko, Dmitrii
    Kasurinen, Jussi
    Taipale, Ossi
    2019 42ND INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY, ELECTRONICS AND MICROELECTRONICS (MIPRO), 2019, : 1509 - 1513
  • [32] Selecting a Notation to Modeling Business Process: A Systematic Literature Review of Technics and Tools
    Araujo, Marcelo Bernardino
    Goncalves, Rodrigo Franco
    ADVANCES IN PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: INITIATIVES FOR A SUSTAINABLE WORLD, 2016, 488 : 198 - 205
  • [33] Processes, Methods and Tools for Engineering Embedded Systems
    Ampatzoglou, Apostolos
    Hemila, Jukka
    PRODUCT-FOCUSED SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT, PROFES 2015, 2015, 9459 : XI - XIII
  • [34] Tools and systems for evolutionary engineering of biomolecules and microorganisms
    Jang, Sungho
    Kim, Minsun
    Hwang, Jaeseong
    Jung, Gyoo Yeol
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2019, 46 (9-10) : 1313 - 1326
  • [35] Service Systems Engineering: Emerging Skills and Tools
    Pineda, Ricardo
    Lopes, Amit
    Tseng, Bill
    Salcedo, Oscar H.
    CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2012, 8 : 420 - 427
  • [36] 3.2.1 Matching Tools to the Systems Engineering Process
    Oliver, David W.
    INCOSE International Symposium, 1995, 5 (01): : 190 - 201
  • [37] The application of systems engineering tools on London Underground
    Wheeler, G
    Fielding, S
    Hooper, A
    COMPUTERS IN RAILWAYS VI, 1998, 2 : 225 - 234
  • [38] Process systems engineering tools in the pharmaceutical industry
    Troup, Gregory M.
    Georgakis, Christos
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 51 : 157 - 171
  • [39] 5.2.3 JUSTIFYING THE INVESTMENT IN SYSTEMS ENGINEERING TOOLS
    TD Technologies, 2425 N. Central Expressway Suite 200, Richardson
    TX
    75080, United States
    INCOSE Int. Sym., 1 (264-269):
  • [40] Toward the tools selection in model based system engineering for embedded systems-A systematic literature review
    Rashid, Muhammad
    Anwar, Muhammad Waseem
    Khan, Aamir M.
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2015, 106 : 150 - 163