DEVELOPMENT OF MULTISITE STREAMFLOW GENERATION MODELS

被引:0
|
作者
Arslan, Chelang A. [1 ]
Buyukyildiz, Meral [2 ]
机构
[1] Kirkuk Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Engn Coll, Kirkuk, Iraq
[2] Selcuk Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Konya, Turkey
来源
FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN | 2016年 / 25卷 / 05期
关键词
Artificial neural network; Matalas; multisite; streamflow; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; RIVER FLOW PREDICTION; WATER-QUALITY; PRECIPITATION; CALIBRATION; SIMULATION; HYDROLOGY; MATRICES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Forecasting of streamflow can have a significant economic impact, as this can help in water management and can be helpful tool to provide protection from water shortages and possible flood damage. In recent work the artificial neural networks different models with different training algorithms were examined to simulate Tigris River using the cross correlation between the flow of different sites or gauge stations. The challenging task in this work was to improve the forecasting models to generate a future series by ANNs models by using input parameters from nearby sites. Therefore the best conventional method to compare and judge the results was selected to be the 1st order autoregressive moving average Matalas which deals with multi variables as input parameters and generate future series for these variables at the same time. The traditional architecture of ANNs models were also a good comparison tools to decide the new multisite ANN models success. It was concluded from this study that consisting nearby sites monthly flow series as input parameters in ANN architecture after investigating the cross correlation between the series's may led to more successful forecasting models. This can also provide a good promise to predict ungauged flow values in some sites which are suffering from missed data by using the flow values from nearby stations.
引用
收藏
页码:1502 / 1512
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Copula-based method for multisite monthly and daily streamflow simulation
    Chen, Lu
    Singh, Vijay P.
    Guo, Shenglian
    Zhou, Jianzhong
    Zhang, Junhong
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2015, 528 : 369 - 384
  • [22] SYNTHETIC STREAMFLOW FORECAST GENERATION
    LETTENMAIER, DP
    JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1984, 110 (03): : 277 - 289
  • [23] Comparison of single-site and multi-site stochastic models for streamflow generation
    Medda, Sanghamitra
    Bhar, Kalyan Kumar
    APPLIED WATER SCIENCE, 2019, 9 (03)
  • [24] Comparison of single-site and multi-site stochastic models for streamflow generation
    Sanghamitra Medda
    Kalyan Kumar Bhar
    Applied Water Science, 2019, 9
  • [25] The ability of streamflow models to capture the impact of climate variability on streamflow
    Weeks, A.
    Barlow, K.
    Githui, F.
    Christy, B.
    19TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION (MODSIM2011), 2011, : 3657 - 3663
  • [26] Streamflow Forecasting without Models
    Krajewski, Witold F.
    Ghimire, Ganesh R.
    Quintero, Felipe
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2020, 21 (08) : 1689 - 1704
  • [27] SELECTING SEASONAL STREAMFLOW MODELS
    CLINE, TB
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1981, 17 (04) : 975 - 984
  • [28] COMPARISON OF ANNUAL STREAMFLOW MODELS
    BURGES, SJ
    LETTENMAIER, DP
    JOURNAL OF THE HYDRAULICS DIVISION-ASCE, 1977, 103 (09): : 991 - 1006
  • [29] Multisite Spatiotemporal Streamflow Simulation - With an Application to Irrigation Water Shortage Risk Assessment
    Hsieh, Hsin-I
    Su, Ming-Daw
    Cheng, Ke-Sheng
    TERRESTRIAL ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC SCIENCES, 2014, 25 (02): : 255 - 266
  • [30] USE OF STREAMFLOW MODELS IN PLANNING
    JACKSON, BB
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1975, 11 (01) : 54 - 63