MRI predictors of tumor-positive margins after breast-conserving surgery

被引:7
|
作者
Bahl, Manisha [1 ,3 ]
Baker, Jay A. [1 ]
Kinsey, Emily N. [2 ]
Ghate, Sujata, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, DUMC Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, DUMC Box 3913, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, 55 Fruit St,WAC 240, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
Breast cancer; Breast-conserving surgery; Ductal carcinoma in situ; Magnetic resonance imaging; Surgical margins; CARCINOMA IN-SITU; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; CONSERVATION SURGERY; CANCER; LUMPECTOMY; BIOPSY; IRRADIATION; MASTECTOMY; EXCISION; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.05.006
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify predictors of tumor-positive surgical margins after breast-conserving surgery on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective study of consecutive women who underwent DCE MRI before breast-conserving surgery from 2005 to 2014. Patient demographics, indication for surgery, MRI findings, biopsy pathology results, and surgical outcomes were reviewed. The unpaired t-test and chi-square test were used to compare the positive and negative margins groups. Results: 554 women (mean age, 56; range, 26-90) underwent DCE MRI before 575 breast-conserving surgeries for invasive carcinoma (n = 473) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (n = 102). Positive margins requiring reexcision occurred in 19.7% (93/473) of surgeries for invasive carcinoma and 31.4% (32/102) of surgeries for DCIS. For invasive carcinoma surgeries, positive margins were more common when MRI demonstrated the finding of non-mass enhancement (NME) rather than the finding of enhancing mass (33.8% [22/65] versus 16.9% [61/360], p < 0.01). Tumor size on MRI was significantly larger in the positive margins group (2.5 cm versus 1.9 cm, p < 0.001). Positive margins were more common with invasive lobular rather than invasive ductal histology at core biopsy (38.3% [18/47] versus 16.0% [56/350], p < 0.001). For DCIS surgeries, there were no significant differences in positive margin rates related to MRI features. Conclusion: For invasive carcinoma surgeries, positive margins are associated with NME on MRI, larger tumor size on MRI, and lobular histology at core biopsy. These findings may be used to predict which patients are at risk for positive margins after breast-conserving surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 49
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Predictors of Residual Tumor in Breast-Conserving Therapy
    Rath, Michelle G.
    Uhlmann, Lorenz
    Heil, Joerg
    Domschke, Christoph
    Roth, Zdravka
    Sinn, Hans-Peter
    Marme, Frederik
    Scharf, Alexander
    Schneeweiss, Andreas
    Kieser, Meinhard
    Sohn, Christof
    Rom, Joachim
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 : S451 - S458
  • [42] Predictors of Residual Tumor in Breast-Conserving Therapy
    Michelle G. Rath
    Lorenz Uhlmann
    Joerg Heil
    Christoph Domschke
    Zdravka Roth
    Hans-Peter Sinn
    Frederik Marme
    Alexander Scharf
    Andreas Schneeweiss
    Meinhard Kieser
    Christof Sohn
    Joachim Rom
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2015, 22 : 451 - 458
  • [43] "No Ink on Tumor" in Breast-Conserving Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Atzori, Giulia
    Gipponi, Marco
    Cornacchia, Chiara
    Diaz, Raquel
    Sparavigna, Marco
    Gallo, Maurizio
    Ruelle, Tommaso
    Murelli, Federica
    Franchelli, Simonetta
    Depaoli, Francesca
    Friedman, Daniele
    Fregatti, Piero
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (07):
  • [44] External validation of a multivariable prediction model for positive resection margins in breast-conserving surgery
    Manhoobi, Irina Palimaru
    Ellbrant, Julia
    Bendahl, Paer-Ola
    Redsted, Soren
    Bodilsen, Anne
    Tramm, Trine
    Christiansen, Peer
    Ryden, Lisa
    BMC RESEARCH NOTES, 2025, 18 (01)
  • [45] Close or positive margins in breast-conserving surgery: is re-excision always necessary?
    Nature Clinical Practice Oncology, 2006, 3 (10): : 529 - 530
  • [46] Multimodal Optical Coherence Tomography for Intraoperative Evaluation of Tumor Margins and Surgical Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery
    Vorontsov, D. A.
    Gubarkova, E. V.
    Sirotkina, M. A.
    Sovetsky, A. A.
    Plekhanov, A. A.
    Kuznetsov, S. S.
    Davydova, D. A.
    Bogomolova, A. Yu.
    Zaitsev, V. Y.
    Gamayunov, S. V.
    Vorontsov, A. Y.
    Sobolevskiy, V. A.
    Gladkova, N. D.
    SOVREMENNYE TEHNOLOGII V MEDICINE, 2022, 14 (02) : 26 - 38
  • [47] The Need for MRI Before Breast-Conserving Surgery
    Le-Petross, Huong T.
    Stafford, R. Jason
    CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS, 2009, 1 (02) : 98 - 103
  • [48] Predictors of recurrence for ductal carcinoma in situ after breast-conserving surgery
    Benson, John R.
    Wishart, Gordon C.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (09): : E348 - E357
  • [49] Predictors of Recurrent Ductal Carcinoma In Situ after Breast-Conserving Surgery
    Kim, Jung Yeon
    Park, Kyeongmee
    Kang, Guhyun
    Kim, Hyun-Jung
    Gwak, Geumhee
    Shin, Young-Joo
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2016, 19 (02) : 185 - 190
  • [50] The need for MRI before breast-conserving surgery
    Huong T. Le-Petross
    R. Jason Stafford
    Current Breast Cancer Reports, 2009, 1 (2) : 98 - 103