Effects of sustainable design strategies on consumer preferences for redesigned packaging

被引:90
|
作者
Steenis, Nigel D. [1 ,2 ]
van der Lans, Ivo A. [2 ]
van Herpen, Erica [2 ]
van Trijp, Hans C. M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Top Inst Food & Nutr, POB 557, NL-6700 AN Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ, Mkt & Consumer Behav Grp, Hollandseweg 1, NL-6717 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Packaging design; Consumer perception; Sustainability; Circular economy; Sustainable design; PRODUCT DEVELOPERS; PUBLIC-GOODS; FOOD; PERCEPTIONS; CONSUMPTION; INNOVATION; PURCHASE; GREEN; CHALLENGES; INTENTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.137
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The environmental benefit from sustainable packaging is not only dependent on the characteristics of the packaging, but also on consumer willingness to purchase sustainably packaged products. Consumer response is likely influenced by the specific design strategies that are used to make packaging more sustainable. Based on the circular economy concept, this paper distinguishes between circular and linear design strategies, and investigates consumer responses to packaging redesigned according to such strategies. Two experiments were conducted to assess to what extent (combinations of) sustainable design strategies affect consumers' purchase intentions. The results show that consumers are more positive toward redesigns following a circular design strategy (e.g., biodegradable materials) compared to linear redesigns (e.g., packaging lightweighting). Additionally, consumers are not more willing to buy packaging redesigns combining multiple sustainable design strategies, relative to those using only a single redesign strategy. Multi-strategy redesigns are perceived only as marginally more sustainable than single strategy redesigns. These diminishing returns can be attributed to a lack of increase in the moral satisfaction consumers achieve from buying product with multi-rather than single-strategy redesigned sustainable packaging. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:854 / 865
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Openability: Producing design limits for consumer packaging
    Yoxall, A.
    Janson, R.
    Bradbury, S. R.
    Langley, J.
    Wearn, J.
    Hayes, S.
    PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE, 2006, 19 (04) : 219 - 225
  • [42] Meat packaging, preservation, and marketing implications: Consumer preferences in an emerging economy
    Wang, H. Holly
    Chen, Junhong
    Bai, Junfei
    Lai, John
    MEAT SCIENCE, 2018, 145 : 300 - 307
  • [43] Brazilian Consumer Preferences for Processed Tomato Packaging Using Conjoint Analysis
    Oenning, Eduardo Jose
    Guimaraes Junior, Djalma
    de Medeiros, Denise Dumke
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PRODUCTS MARKETING, 2018, 24 (06) : 724 - 744
  • [44] Consumer preferences for reduced packaging under economic instruments and recycling policy
    Yamaguchi, Keiko
    Takeuchi, Kenji
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 48 : 540 - 547
  • [45] Do isolated packaging variables influence consumer's attention and preferences?
    Garcia-Madariaga, Jesus
    Blasco Lopez, Maria-Francisca
    Moya Burgos, Ingrit
    Recuero Virto, Nuria
    PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2019, 200 : 96 - 103
  • [46] INFLUENCE OF PACKAGING MATERIALS AND FREEZING TEMPERATURES ON CONSUMER PREFERENCES FOR TURKEY PIECES
    MACNEIL, JH
    DAWSON, LE
    BIGBEE, DG
    FARMER, EH
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 1958, 37 (05) : 1223 - 1223
  • [47] Unpacking Consumer Preferences: Perceptions and Sustainability of Packaging Material for Orange Juice
    Dlamini, Nomzamo N.
    Mayhew, Emily J.
    Nolden, Alissa A.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (14)
  • [48] Consumer preferences for beef color and packaging did not affect eating satisfaction
    Carpenter, CE
    Cornforth, DP
    Whittler, D
    MEAT SCIENCE, 2001, 57 (04) : 359 - 363
  • [49] Sustainable Paper-Based Packaging: A Consumer's Perspective
    Oloyede, Omobolanle O.
    Lignou, Stella
    FOODS, 2021, 10 (05)
  • [50] Conjoint analysis of consumer preferences for dress design
    Zhou, Xiaoxi
    Xu, Yunhao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLOTHING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 32 (01) : 73 - 84