Evaluating the Heterogeneity Effect of Fertilizer Use Intensity on Agricultural Eco-Efficiency in China: Evidence from a Panel Quantile Regression Model

被引:8
|
作者
Hou, Mengyang [1 ,2 ]
Xi, Zenglei [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Suyan [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Univ, Sch Econ, Baoding 071000, Peoples R China
[2] Hebei Univ, Ctr Resources Utilizat & Environm Conservat, Baoding 071000, Peoples R China
[3] Hebei GEO Univ, Sch Management, Shijiazhuang 050031, Hebei, Peoples R China
[4] Hebei GEO Univ, Nat Resource Asset Capital Res Ctr, Shijiazhuang 050031, Hebei, Peoples R China
关键词
agricultural eco-efficiency (AEE); fertilizer use intensity (FUI); quantile regression model (QRM); heterogeneity; spatial lag; SLACKS-BASED MEASURE; DETERMINANTS; COUNTRIES; POLLUTION; SECTOR;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph19116612
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Chemical fertilizer is one of the most important input factors in agricultural production, but the excessive use of fertilizer inevitably leads to the loss of agricultural eco-efficiency (AEE). Therefore, it is necessary to explore the impact of fertilizer use intensity (FUI) on AEE. However, ordinary panel regression, based on the assumption of parameter homogeneity may yield biased estimation conclusions. In this regard, a panel quantile regression model (QRM) was constructed with the provincial panel data of China from 1978-2020 to test the difference and variation of this impact under heterogeneous conditions. The model was then combined with the spatial econometric model to explore the effect of the spatial lag factor. The results are as follows: (1) The QSM has unveiled a great improvement space for AEE that remains low overall, despite displaying a rising trend; the highest AEE is in the eastern region. (2) The FUI has a significant negative effect on AEE with the rise in quantiles, this negative effect tended towards weakening overall, although it rebounded slightly; it was stronger in areas with low AEE. It is necessary to consider the heterogeneous conditions in comparison with the average treatment effect of ordinary panel econometric regressions. (3) The impact of FUI shows significant variability in different economic sub-divisions and different sub-periods. (4) After considering the spatial effect of fertilizer use, the negative influence on local AEE had a faster decay rate as the quantile rose, but could produce a positive spatial spillover effect on AEE in neighboring areas. Local governments should dynamically adjust and optimize their fertilizer reduction and efficiency improvement policies according to the level and development stage of their AEE to establish a complete regional linked agroecological cooperation mechanism.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How digitalization and financial development impact eco-efficiency? Evidence from China
    Jiujiu Cui
    Wenju Wang
    Zhenling Chen
    Guangqian Ren
    Xiaofang Gao
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 3847 - 3861
  • [22] Impacts of Dynamic Agglomeration Externalities on Eco-Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from China
    Yu, Yantuan
    Zhang, Yun
    Miao, Xiao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (10)
  • [23] Evaluating eco-efficiency and optimal levels of fertilizer use based on the social cost and social benefits in tea production
    Ul Haq, Shamsheer
    Boz, Ismet
    Shahbaz, Pomi
    Yildirim, Cagatay
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (26) : 33008 - 33019
  • [24] Evaluating eco-efficiency and optimal levels of fertilizer use based on the social cost and social benefits in tea production
    Shamsheer ul Haq
    Ismet Boz
    Pomi Shahbaz
    Çağatay Yıldırım
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27 : 33008 - 33019
  • [25] Peer effect, political competition and eco-efficiency: evidence from city-level data in China
    Chen, Xudong
    Huang, Bihong
    Yu, Yantuan
    SPATIAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS, 2024, 19 (02) : 183 - 205
  • [26] Impact of Rural Non-Agricultural Employment on Eco-Efficiency of Farmland Utilization in China: Evidence From 31 Years
    Lu, Hua
    Gong, Jiahong
    Zhou, Laiyou
    Wang, Guan
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2025,
  • [27] Agricultural eco-efficiency and sustainable agricultural development influential factors and heterogeneities: Exclusive evidence from Chinese cities
    Wang, Yanchun
    Yang, Suchang
    Ahmad, Fayyaz
    Chandio, Abbas Ali
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [28] The effect of agricultural subsidies on chemical fertilizer use: Evidence from a new policy in China
    Fan, Pengfei
    Mishra, Ashok K.
    Feng, Shuyi
    Su, Min
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 344
  • [29] Process and influencing factors of agricultural eco-efficiency in northern Jiangsu of China from 2000 to 2020
    Luo J.
    Jin X.
    Liu J.
    Liang X.
    Han B.
    Zhou Y.
    Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2023, 39 (15): : 239 - 248
  • [30] An analysis of the impact of service inputs in manufacturing industries on eco-efficiency: evidence from China
    Zhao, Di
    Chen, Jian
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (43) : 61825 - 61840