Selecting Appropriate Project Delivery System: Fuzzy Approach with Risk Analysis

被引:63
|
作者
Mostafavi, Ali [3 ,4 ]
Karamouz, Mohammad [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Polytech Inst, Brooklyn, NY USA
[2] Univ Tehran, Sch Civil Engn, Tehran, Iran
[3] Purdue Univ, Sch Civil Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[4] Univ Tehran, Dept Civil Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Project delivery systems; Fuzzy multiattribute decision making; Fuzzy TOPSIS; Risk attitude; Risk analysis;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000190
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The selection of an appropriate project delivery system that suits all project and owner needs is one of the key decisions to a successful project. Therefore, this decision should be made based on thorough analysis. In this paper, a fuzzy multiattribute decision-making (FMADM) model is developed. The model accounts for uncertainties and imprecision in the decision space as well as fuzziness in the nature of the decision attributes. The model utilizes fuzzy decision-making approach in order to evaluate the membership function corresponding to the utility of each project delivery alternative. Project delivery system alternatives are ranked using fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method based on their utility membership functions and by evaluating the distance of each project delivery alternative from fuzzy ideal solutions. In the TOPSIS method, alternatives are ranked based on their closeness coefficient (CC). In addition, the risk attitude of the decision maker is considered in the model by using derived utility membership functions corresponding to the risk attitude of the decision maker. The model is applied to a petrochemical project as a case study. In the case study, the model outcome that ranked Turnkey system as the best system conforms to the lessons learned by the decision maker from several past projects. Moreover, sensitivity analysis is done in the case study. The results show the significant value of the FMADM model for selecting appropriate project delivery system for projects.
引用
收藏
页码:923 / 930
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An expert system approach for the choice of appropriate data types in a Fuzzy Database
    Touzi, Amel Grissa
    Ben Hassine, Mohamed Ali
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2010, 21 (04) : 261 - 273
  • [42] Standard Project Risk Analysis Approach
    Zuzek, Tena
    Rihar, Lidija
    Berlec, Tomaz
    Kusar, Janez
    BUSINESS SYSTEMS RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2020, 11 (02): : 149 - 158
  • [43] Risk Analysis Method: A Fuzzy Approach
    Deng, Yong
    Su, Xiaoyan
    Jiang, Wen
    Xu, Jianling
    Xu, Peida
    THIRD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRONIC COMMERCE AND SECURITY WORKSHOPS (ISECS 2010), 2010, : 146 - 150
  • [44] Project Delivery System Decision Making using Pythagorean Fuzzy TOPSIS
    Su, Limin
    Li, Huimin
    Cao, Yongchao
    Lv, Lelin
    INZINERINE EKONOMIKA-ENGINEERING ECONOMICS, 2019, 30 (04): : 461 - 471
  • [45] Selecting the Best Project Using the Fuzzy ELECTRE Method
    Rouyendegh, Babak Daneshvar
    Erol, Serpil
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2012, 2012
  • [46] Selecting appropriate fuzzy PID control structure for power electronic applications
    Al-Greer, Maher
    Armstrong, Matthew
    Pickert, Volker
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING-JOE, 2019, (17): : 4457 - 4460
  • [47] A novel model based on the fuzzy Grey Relational Analysis (F-GRA) approach for selecting the appropriate high-speed train set
    Garg, Chandra Prakash
    Gorcun, Omer F.
    Kucukonder, Hande
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2023, 27 (24) : 19247 - 19264
  • [48] A novel model based on the fuzzy Grey Relational Analysis (F-GRA) approach for selecting the appropriate high-speed train set
    Chandra Prakash Garg
    Ömer F. Görçün
    Hande Küçükönder
    Soft Computing, 2023, 27 : 19247 - 19264
  • [49] Selecting project delivery methods for water treatment plants
    Feghaly, Jeffrey
    El Asmar, Mounir
    Ariaratnam, Samuel
    Bearup, Wylie
    ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 27 (04) : 936 - 951
  • [50] A risk management approach to the quantitative analysis of project risk
    Lin, JC
    Johnson, DH
    PSAM 5: PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2000, (34): : 2775 - 2780