Effect of nitrous oxide on propofol requirement during target-controlled infusion for oocyte retrieval

被引:8
|
作者
Handa-Tsutsui, F. [1 ]
Kodaka, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Saitama Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan
关键词
target-controlled infusion; in-vitro fertilization; propofol;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.08.001
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Oocyte (egg) retrieval for in-vitro fertilization is a relatively short procedure, usually performed as an outpatient. Propofol is a suitable anesthetic agent. Target-controlled infusion is a recently developed system that aids rapid recovery from propofol anesthesia. This study sought to determine the target concentration of propofol required to prevent movement in 50% (Cp50) and 95% (Cp95) of women during oocyte retrieval, and investigated whether supplemental nitrous oxide (N2O) modified the Cp50 and Cp95. Methods: Forty-seven women scheduled for oocyte retrieval were randomly selected to receive either O-2-air mixture (control group; n = 23) or 50% O-2-N2O mixture (Nitrous oxide group; n = 24). Propofol was infused using a target-controlled infusion system with the concentration determined by up-down sequential allocation using 0.5 mu g/mL step size. Transvaginal oocyte retrieval was performed after reaching target blood concentration. Patient responses to oocyte retrieval were noted as either no movement or movement. Results: Using target-controlled infusion the Cp50 was 4.1 mu g/mL in the control group and 3.3 mu g/mL in the nitrous oxide group. Calculated Cp95 values were 4.0 mu g/mL and 5.1 mu g/mL with and without 50% nitrous oxide respectively. Conclusions: The Cp50 value for target-controlled infusion propofol during oocyte retrieval was significantly reduced by a factor of 1.24 (95% CI 1.07-1.44) with the use of 50% nitrous oxide. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 16
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of three different target-controlled remifentanil infusion rates during target-controlled propofol infusion for oocyte retrieval
    Coskun, Demet
    Gunaydin, Berrin
    Tas, Ayca
    Inan, Gozde
    Celebi, Hulya
    Kaya, Kadir
    CLINICS, 2011, 66 (05) : 811 - 815
  • [2] Swallowing Impairment During Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion
    Gemma, Marco
    Pasin, Laura
    Oriani, Alessandro
    Agostoni, Massimo
    Palonta, Francesca
    Ramella, Barbara
    Bussi, Mario
    Beretta, Luigi
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 122 (01): : 48 - 54
  • [3] Remifentanil concentration during target-controlled infusion of propofol
    Crankshaw, DP
    Chan, C
    Leslie, K
    Bjorksten, AR
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2002, 30 (05) : 578 - 583
  • [4] The effect of nitrous oxide on jugular bulb oxygen saturation during remifentanil plus target-controlled infusion propofol or sevoflurane in patients with brain tumors
    Muñoz, HR
    Núñez, GE
    de la Fuente, JE
    Campos, MG
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 94 (02): : 389 - 392
  • [5] Laryngeal mask insertion during target-controlled infusion of propofol
    Baik, HJ
    Kim, JH
    Lee, CH
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2001, 13 (03) : 175 - 181
  • [6] Modelling the effect site compartment in a target-controlled infusion of propofol
    Croall, A.
    Hawthorne, C.
    Shaw, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 119 (02) : E3 - E4
  • [7] Modelling the effect site compartment in a target-controlled infusion of propofol
    Croall, A.
    Hawthorne, C.
    Shaw, M.
    SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 63 (01) : 59 - 59
  • [8] Target-controlled infusion of propofol for the difficult airway
    Kiyama, S
    Yoshikawa, T
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1998, 26 (05) : 591 - 592
  • [9] MANUAL COMPARED WITH TARGET-CONTROLLED INFUSION OF PROPOFOL
    RUSSELL, D
    WILKES, MP
    HUNTER, SC
    GLEN, JB
    HUTTON, P
    KENNY, GNC
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 75 (05) : 562 - 566
  • [10] Target-controlled infusion of propofol and anesthesia induction
    Sun, Yun B.
    Liang, Yong X.
    Gu, Miao N.
    Wang, Shi D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2012, 24 (01) : 75 - 76