Polygenic Scores for Plasticity: A New Tool for Studying Gene-Environment Interplay

被引:11
|
作者
Johnson, Rebecca [1 ]
Sotoudeh, Ramina [2 ]
Conley, Dalton [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, McCourt Sch Publ Policy, Washington, DC 20057 USA
[2] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Coll, Oxford, England
[3] Princeton Univ, Dept Sociol, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[4] Princeton Univ, Off Populat Res, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
Gene-environment interactions; BMI; Education; UK Biobank; Health and Retirement Study; BODY-MASS; GENOME-WIDE; PHENOTYPIC VARIABILITY; LIFE-COURSE; EDUCATION; CONTEXT; SMOKING;
D O I
10.1215/00703370-9957418
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
Fertility, health, education, and other outcomes of interest to demographers are the product of an individual's genetic makeup and their social environment. Yet, gene x environment (GxE) research deploys a limited toolkit on the genetic side to study the gene-environment interplay, relying on polygenic scores (PGSs) that reflect the influence of genetics on levels of an outcome. In this article, we develop a genetic summary measure better suited for GxE research: variance polygenic scores (vPGSs), which are PGSs that reflect genetic contributions to plasticity in outcomes. First, we use the UK Biobank (N similar to 408,000 in the analytic sample) and the Health and Retirement Study (N similar to 5,700 in the analytic sample) to compare four approaches to constructing PGSs for plasticity. The results show that widely used methods for discovering which genetic variants affect outcome variability fail to serve as distinctive new tools for GxE. Second, using the PGSs that do capture distinctive genetic contributions to plasticity, we analyze heterogeneous effects of a UK education reform on health and educational attainment. The results show the properties of a useful new tool for population scientists studying the interplay of nature and nurture and for population-based studies that are releasing PGSs to applied researchers.
引用
收藏
页码:1045 / 1070
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Gene-environment interplay in the context of romantic relationships
    Whisman, Mark A.
    South, Susan C.
    CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 13 : 136 - 141
  • [42] Gene-environment interaction in expertise acquisition: Practice effects on musical expertise vary by polygenic scores for cognitive performance
    Wesseldijk, Laura W.
    Mosing, Miriam A.
    Ullen, Fredrik
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (14)
  • [43] Polygenic scores for schizophrenia and major depression are associated with psychosocial risk factors in children: evidence of gene-environment correlation
    Machlitt-Northen, Sandra
    Keers, Robert
    Munroe, Patricia B.
    Howard, David M.
    Trubetskoy, Vassily
    Pluess, Michael
    JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 63 (10) : 1140 - 1152
  • [44] Joint modeling of gene-environment correlations and interactions using polygenic risk scores in case-control studies
    Wang, Ziqiao
    Shi, Wen
    Carroll, Raymond J.
    Chatterjee, Nilanjan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 193 (10) : 1451 - 1459
  • [45] Gene-environment interplay in oppositional defiant and conduct disorder
    Simonoff, E
    CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 10 (02) : 351 - +
  • [46] Gene-environment interplay in early life cognitive development
    von Stumm, Sophie
    Kandaswamy, Radhika
    Maxwell, Jessye
    INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 98
  • [47] Patterns of inheritance in behavioural disorders and gene-environment interplay
    McGuffin, P
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2002, 114 (07): : 709 - 709
  • [48] Simulating genomic data under gene-environment interplay
    Verhulst, Brad
    Neale, Michael
    Eaves, Lindon
    BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2013, 43 (06) : 546 - 546
  • [49] Gene-Environment Interplay, Family Relationships, and Child Adjustment
    Horwitz, Briana N.
    Neiderhiser, Jenae M.
    JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 2011, 73 (04) : 804 - 816
  • [50] Gene-environment interplay in relation to emotional and behavioral disturbance
    Rutter, M
    Silberg, J
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 53 : 463 - 490