Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for monitoring the anti-angiogenesis efficacy in a C6 glioma rat model

被引:4
|
作者
Hou, Weishu [1 ]
Li, Xiaohu [1 ]
Pan, Hongli [1 ]
Xu, Man [1 ]
Bi, Sixing [1 ]
Shen, Yujun [2 ]
Yu, Yongqiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, 218 Jixi Rd, Hefei 230022, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Med Univ, Sch Basic Med Sci, Biopharmaceut Res Inst, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; glioma; angiogenesis; therapy; TUMOR RESPONSE; MRI; BEVACIZUMAB; GLIOBLASTOMA; PERMEABILITY; VASCULATURE; PERFUSION; SURVIVAL; XENOGRAFTS; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1177/0284185119887598
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is useful in predicting responses to angiogenic therapy of malignant tumors. Purpose To observe the dynamics of DCE-MRI parameters in evaluating early effects of antiangiogenic therapy in a C6 glioma rat model. Material and Methods The Bevacizumab or vehicle treatment was started from the 14th day after glioma model was established. The treated and control groups (n = 13 per group) underwent DCE-MRI scans on days 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 after treatment. Tumor volume was calculated according to T2-weighted images. Hematoxylin and eosin, microvessel density (MVD), and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) examination were performed on day 7. The MRI parameters between the two groups were compared and correlations with immunohistochemical scores were analyzed. Results The average tumor volume of treated group was significantly lower than that of control group on day 7 (81.764 +/- 1.043 vs. 103.634 +/- 3.868 mm(3), P = 0.002). K-trans and K-ep decreased in the treated group while they increased in the control group. The differences were observed on day 5 (K-trans: 0.045 +/- 0.018 vs. 0.093 +/- 0.014 min(-1), P < 0.001; K-ep: 0.062 +/- 0.018 vs. 0.134 +/- 0.047 min(-1), P = 0.005) and day 7 (K-trans: 0.032 +/- 0.010 vs. 0.115 +/- 0.025 min(-1), P < 0.001; K-ep: 0.045 +/- 0.016 vs. 0.144 +/- 0.042 min(-1), P < 0.001). The difference of V-e was observed on day 5 (0.847 +/- 0.248 vs. 0.397 +/- 0.151, P = 0.009) and 7 (0.920 +/- 0.154 vs. 0.364 +/- 0.105, P = 0.006). K-trans and K-ep showed positive correlations with MVD and V-e showed negative correlation with PCNA. Conclusion DCE-MRI can assess the changes of early effects of anti-angiogenic therapy in preclinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:973 / 982
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quantitative analysis of permeability for glioma grading using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Zhao, Ming
    Guo, Li-Li
    Huang, Ning
    Wu, Qiong
    Zhou, Li
    Zhao, Hui
    Zhang, Jing
    Fu, Kuang
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2017, 14 (05) : 5418 - 5426
  • [22] Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapeutic efficacy in the head and neck tumors
    Tomura, N
    Omachi, K
    Sakuma, I
    Takahashi, S
    Izumi, J
    Watanabe, O
    Watarai, J
    Sageshima, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2005, 26 (03) : 163 - 167
  • [23] Monitoring the Effects of Anti-angiogenesis on the Radiation Sensitivity of Pancreatic Cancer Xenografts Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography
    Cao, Ning
    Cao, Minsong
    Chin-Sinex, Helen
    Mendonca, Marc
    Ko, Song-Chu
    Stantz, Keith M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 88 (02): : 412 - 418
  • [24] Functional tumor imaging with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Choyke, PL
    Dwyer, AJ
    Knopp, MV
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2003, 17 (05) : 509 - 520
  • [25] CONTRAST-ENHANCED DYNAMIC MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING (DMRI) OF THE RAT-KIDNEY
    FRANSEN, R
    MULLER, HJ
    NICOLAY, K
    KOOMANS, HA
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 1994, 5 (03): : 270 - 270
  • [26] Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Applications in Oncology
    Teo, Q. Q.
    Thng, C. H.
    Koh, T. S.
    Ng, Q. S. p
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 26 (10) : E9 - E20
  • [27] Vascularity and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Frankhouser, David E.
    Dietze, Eric
    Mahabal, Ashish
    Seewaldt, Victoria L.
    FRONTIERS IN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 1
  • [28] Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the sarcopenic muscle
    Nicolato E.
    Farace P.
    Asperio R.M.
    Marzola P.
    Lunati E.
    Sbarbati A.
    Osculati F.
    BMC Medical Imaging, 2 (1)
  • [29] Information Criteria for Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Shinohara, Russell T.
    Crainiceanu, Ciprian S.
    Caffo, Brian S.
    Reich, Daniel S.
    2013 3RD INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON PATTERN RECOGNITION IN NEUROIMAGING (PRNI 2013), 2013, : 37 - 41
  • [30] Application of Distributed Parameter Model to Assessment of Glioma IDH Mutation Status by Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Li, Zongfang
    Zhao, Wei
    He, Bo
    Koh, Tong San
    Li, Yanxi
    Zeng, Yizhen
    Zhang, Zhuo
    Zhang, Jingzhong
    Hou, Zujun
    CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2020, 2020