First-trimester Aneuploidy Screening Is There a Maternal Age at Which It Loses Effectiveness?

被引:0
|
作者
Lau, Gregory W. [1 ]
Feldman, Daniele S. [1 ]
Morales, Carlos M. [1 ]
Smith, Deebra [1 ]
Edwards, Rennatha [1 ]
Williams, John, III [1 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
关键词
advanced maternal age; aneuploidy; chromosomal abnormality; first trimester screening; nuchal translucency; prenatal diagnosis; Trisomy; 13; 18; 21; DOWN-SYNDROME; AMNIOCENTESIS; RISK;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To determine the maternal age at which the likelihood of a screen-positive result justifies diagnostic testing. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of women who presented for first-trimester screening using nuchal translucency (NT) measurements with or without serum biochemistry between January 2000December 2011. Using cutoffs of 1:300, 1:270, and 1:200, the Trisomy 21 (T21) screen-positive rates were stratified by maternal age. RESULTS: A total of 6,927 women underwent first-trimester screening; women with multiple gestations and/or using donor oocytes were excluded. Of the remaining women, 4,882 had combined NT and biochemistry results, while 1,767 had NT without serum screening results. Screen-positive rates were stratified by maternal age. An increase in the screen-positive rate is noted for both groups after age 40 but is more pronounced after age 43, where the screen-positive rate is 97.8% and 63.0% using cutoffs of 1:300 for the NT and NT and Biochemistry groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Women undergoing first-trimester screening at age 40 have approximately 30% likelihood of screening positive for T21. This rate increases to roughly 7090% at age 44. This information will affect the counseling of patients who are considering prenatal screening versus diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 447
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reference centile charts of first-trimester aneuploidy screening & Doppler parameters for Indian population
    Kumar, Manisha
    Singh, Shalini
    Sharma, Karuna
    Singh, Ritu
    Ravi, Vaiala
    Gupta, Usha
    Bhattacharjee, Jaya
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 148 (04) : 427 - 434
  • [42] Nuchal translucency and nasal bone in first-trimester ultrasound screening for aneuploidy in multiple pregnancies
    Sepulveda, W.
    Wong, A. E.
    Casasbuenas, A.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 33 (02) : 152 - 156
  • [43] First-trimester markers of aneuploidy in women positive for HIV
    Savvidou, M. D.
    Samuel, I.
    Syngelaki, A.
    Poulton, M.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (07) : 844 - 848
  • [44] First-trimester biochemical markers of aneuploidy and the prediction of small-for-gestational age fetuses
    Spencer, K.
    Cowans, N. J.
    Avgidou, K.
    Molina, F.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 31 (01) : 15 - 19
  • [45] Approach to Screening for Aneuploidy in First Trimester
    Thummalakuntal, Praveen
    Panditi, Surekha
    JOURNAL OF FETAL MEDICINE, 2014, 1 (04) : 175 - 179
  • [46] First trimester aneuploidy screening using nuchal translucency, free beta human chorionic gonadotrophin and maternal age
    Scott, F
    Wheeler, D
    Sinosich, M
    Boogert, A
    Anderson, J
    Edelman, D
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 1996, 36 (04): : 381 - 384
  • [47] First-trimester Down syndrome screening
    Hallahan, TW
    Krantz, DA
    Macri, VJ
    Shine, TJ
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2006, 52 (01) : 160 - 161
  • [48] Ethical issues in first-trimester screening
    Chasen, S
    Skupski, D
    McCullough, L
    Chervenak, F
    THIRD WORLD CONGRESS ON CONTROVERSIES IN OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY & INFERTILITY, 2002, : 117 - 122
  • [49] THE FIRST-TRIMESTER COMBINED SCREENING FOR PREECLAMPSIA
    Vojtassakova, Denisa
    Vojtassak, Stefan
    AKTUALNI GYNEKOLOGIE A PORODNICTVI, 2021, 13 : 9 - 16
  • [50] Nuchal Translucency and First-Trimester Screening
    Walter G. Harry
    Kathryn L. Reed
    The Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation: JSGI, 2006, 13 (3): : 153 - 154