Comparison of methods between the Child Behavior Checklist and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

被引:0
|
作者
Bettge, S [1 ]
Ravens-Sieberer, U [1 ]
Wietzker, A [1 ]
Hölling, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Robert Koch Inst, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
关键词
mental health problems and psychiatric disorders; psychological diagnostics; children and adolescents; comparison of methods;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Few instruments have been developed to screen emotional and behavioural problems and mental disorders using questionnaire methods in a broad study, as will be done in the Health Survey for Children and Adolescents. in the context of this survey's pretest, two questionnaires-the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)-were compared regarding their psychometric properties, their diagnostic power, and the study participants' acceptance of the instruments. With this comparison, the question was addressed concerning which of the two questionnaires mentioned above is more reliable, valid and acceptable to the participants in describing mental health problems and psychiatric disorders in a population-based survey intended for a target age group of 6 to 17-year olds. The results of this methodical comparison show that both instruments are comparably useful for screening purposes. Both instruments detected mental disorders that were established in a clinical interview with equal probability. in this regard, the self-report tends to be superior to the parents' report in the age group from 11 to 17 years. The SDQ displays a slightly higher acceptance and-in comparison to the CBCL-a considerably lower number of items. It can therefore be recommended for use in the survey.
引用
收藏
页码:S119 / S124
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: research and clinical applications
    Vostanis, Panos
    CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 19 (04) : 367 - 372
  • [42] Dutch version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
    Brigit M. van Widenfelt
    Arnold W. Goedhart
    Philip D. A. Treffers
    Robert Goodman
    European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2003, 12 : 281 - 289
  • [44] Dutch version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
    van Widenfelt, BM
    Goedhart, AW
    Treffers, PDA
    Goodman, R
    EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 12 (06) : 281 - 289
  • [45] Validation of the Arabic strengths and difficulties questionnaire in Qatar
    L. L. Gilstrap
    A. Nazeer
    M. Ather
    D. Shahwar
    I. Shaffeeullah
    A. Magbool
    M. W. Azeem
    Middle East Current Psychiatry, 30
  • [46] Investigation of a bifactor model of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
    Caci, Herve
    Morin, Alexandre J. S.
    Tran, Antoine
    EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 24 (10) : 1291 - 1301
  • [47] Validation of the Arabic strengths and difficulties questionnaire in Qatar
    Gilstrap, L. L.
    Nazeer, A.
    Ather, M.
    Shahwar, D.
    Shaffeeullah, I.
    Magbool, A.
    Azeem, M. W.
    MIDDLE EAST CURRENT PSYCHIATRY-MECPSYCH, 2023, 30 (01):
  • [48] Investigating the Structural Model of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
    Skoczen, Ilona
    Rogoza, Radostaw
    Mackiewic, Marta
    Najderska, Maigorzata
    Cieciuch, Jan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2018, 34 (05) : 312 - 320
  • [49] Investigation of a bifactor model of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
    Hervé Caci
    Alexandre J. S. Morin
    Antoine Tran
    European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2015, 24 : 1291 - 1301
  • [50] Strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) - Evaluations and applications
    Rothenberger, A
    Woerner, W
    EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 13 (Suppl 2) : 1 - 2