Short-term effects of the orthodontic removable traction appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion: A randomized controlled trial

被引:5
|
作者
Alzabibi, Batool Ahmad [1 ]
Burhan, Ahmad Sharafeddin [1 ]
Hajeer, Mohammad Younis [1 ]
Nawaya, Fehmieh Rafik [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Damascus, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, Damascus, Syria
[2] Syrian Private Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, Damascus, Syria
关键词
malocclusion; angle Class III; removable orthodontic appliances; FACE MASK THERAPY; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.17219/dmp/126304
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background. The orthodontic removable traction appliance (ORTA) was introduced as an intraoral removable appliance to treat Class III patients, but the pure treatment effects of ORTA have not been established yet. Objectives. The aim of the study was to evaluate the skeletal, dental and soft tissue changes following the use of ORTA in treating Class III growing patients, and to compare these changes with those observed in an untreated control group (UCG). Material and methods. Forty-two patients with Class III malocclusion (mean age: 9.04 +/- 0.84 years) were randomly allocated to either the intervention group (ORTA) or UCG with a 1:1 allocation ratio. The patients in the ORTA group were treated until a positive overjet was achieved, whereas those in UCG were observed for an average of 6 months. Lateral cephalograms were obtained before (T1) and at the end of the treatment or observation period (T2). Twenty-six variables were used to evaluate treatment changes. The paired and independent t tests were used to detect significant differences within and between the groups, respectively. Results. Forty-two patients who met the inclusion criteria were included primarily. Two patients in UCG dropped out of the study. Therefore, 40 patients were included in the statistical analyses (ORTA: 21; UCG: 19). The orthodontic removable traction appliance was able to correct Class III malocclusion in a mean treatment time of 4.34 +/- 2.02 months. The maxilla moved forward by a mean of 1.31 degrees, which was significantly greater than in the case of UCG (i.e., a mean difference of 1.02 degrees). The mandible moved significantly backward in the ORTA group (the mean change in SNB: -1.85 degrees) and significantly forward in UCG (the mean change in SNB: 0.97 degrees), leaving the overall sagittal skeletal change significantly greater in the ORTA group as compared to UCG (the mean change in ANB: 3.81 degrees) (p < 0.001). Conclusions. In the short term, ORTA seemed to be an effective intraoral removable appliance in the treatment of growing Class III patients.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 172
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of orthodontic treatment with activator appliance on patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xie, Jiye
    Huang, Chunrong
    Yin, Kang
    Park, Juyoung
    Xu, Yanhua
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (12) : 12319 - 12334
  • [22] Short-term anteroposterior treatment effects of functional appliances and extraoral traction on Class II malocclusion - A meta-analysis
    Antonarakis, Gregory Stylianos
    Killiaridis, Stavros
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2007, 77 (05) : 907 - 914
  • [23] Long-term stability of surgical-orthodontic treatment for skeletal Class III malocclusion with mild asymmetry
    Akan, Seden
    Kocadereli, Ilken
    Tuncbilek, Gokhan
    JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCE, 2017, 59 (01) : 161 - 164
  • [24] Weak evidence supports the short-term benefits of orthopaedic treatment for Class III malocclusion in childrenQuestion: What is the most effective treatment for class III malocclusion in children?
    Hu Long
    Fan Jian
    Wenli Lai
    Evidence-Based Dentistry, 2014, 15 (1) : 21 - 22
  • [25] Combined prosthodontic and orthodontic treatment of a patient with a Class III skeletal malocclusion: A clinical report
    Sakar, O
    Beyli, M
    Marsan, G
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2004, 92 (03): : 224 - 228
  • [26] Long-term skeletal and profile stability after surgical-orthodontic treatment of Class II and Class III malocclusion
    Sa de Lir, Ana de Lourdes
    de Moura, Walter Leal
    Oliveira Ruellas, Antonio Carlos
    Gomes Souza, Margareth Maria
    Nojima, Lincoln Issamu
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 41 (04) : 296 - 302
  • [27] Management of skeletal Class III malocclusion with face mask therapy and comprehensive orthodontic treatment
    Muthukumar, Kirthika
    Vijaykumar, N. M.
    Sainath, M. C.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2016, 7 (01) : 98 - 102
  • [28] Dentoskeletal effects of aesthetic and conventional twin block appliances in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial
    Alsilq, Mohamed Najati
    Youssef, Mohamed
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [29] Class III Malocclusion Camoufllage Treatment Using a Conventional Orthodontic Appliance in a Non-Growing Patient
    Monika, Fransiska
    Widayati, Retno
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY INDONESIA, 2023, 30 (01)
  • [30] Clinical Curative Effect of a Fixed Appliance with Maxillary Protraction in the Treatment of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion
    Liu, Yi
    Zheng, Ying
    Liu, Fan
    Guo, Yong-juan
    An, Na
    JOURNAL OF HARD TISSUE BIOLOGY, 2013, 22 (03) : 363 - 367