Beyond rationality: Expanding the practice of shared decision making in modern medicine

被引:25
|
作者
Thomas, Elizabeth C. [1 ]
Bass, Sarah Bauerle [2 ]
Siminoff, Laura A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Social & Behav Sci, 1700 N Broad St, Philadelphia, PA 19121 USA
[2] Temple Univ, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Social & Behav Sci, 1301 Cecil B Moore Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[3] Temple Univ, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Social & Behav Sci, 1101 W Montgomery Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
关键词
Medical decision making; Patient-centered care; Normative decision-making; Descriptive decision-making; TRAINING HEALTH-PROFESSIONALS; PHYSICIAN COMMUNICATION; CARE PROFESSIONALS; PATIENT; RISK; ENCOUNTER; FACILITATORS; INVOLVEMENT; DISPARITIES; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113900
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The contemporary healthcare field operates according to an autonomy model of medical decision-making. This model stipulates that patients have the right to make informed choices about their care. Shared decision making (SDM) has arisen as the dominant approach for clinicians and patients to collaborate in care planning and implementation. This approach relies heavily on normative (rational) decision-making processes, and often leaves out descriptive influences that stem from personal, social, and environmental factors and explain how decisions are typically made in the real world. The lack of attention to descriptive decision-making limits SDM in many ways. A multi-level approach to expanding the practice of SDM is proposed, including tailoring the decision encounter based on patients' social, cultural, and environmental context; using relational elements strategically as part of the SDM process; and modifying incentive models to promote greater attention to descriptive impacts on decision-making. These modifications are expected to make SDM, and thus patient care, more inclusive, effective, and acceptable to diverse patients.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Beyond Reason: Uniting Intuition and Rationality in Software Architecture Decision Making
    Pretorius, Carianne
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE COMPANION (ICSA-C 2019), 2019, : 275 - 282
  • [22] Shared decision-making is not common in clinical practice
    Schoon, Yvonne
    HEART, 2022, 108 (07) : 498 - 499
  • [23] Does shared decision making exist in oncologic practice?
    Glimelius, Bengt
    Cavalli-Bjorkman, Nina
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2016, 55 (02) : 125 - 128
  • [24] Implementing and Evaluating Shared Decision Making in Oncology Practice
    Kane, Heather L.
    Halpern, Michael T.
    Squiers, Linda B.
    Treiman, Katherine A.
    McCormack, Lauren A.
    CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2014, 64 (06) : 377 - 388
  • [25] Learning shared decision-making in clinical practice
    Oerlemans, Anke J. M.
    Knippenberg, Marjan L.
    Olthuis, Gert J.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2021, 104 (05) : 1206 - 1212
  • [26] Health decision aids to facilitate shared decision making in office practice
    Barry, MJ
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 136 (02) : 127 - 135
  • [27] SHARED DECISION MAKING IN STANDARD RHEUMATOLOGY PRACTICE: FROM POLICY TO PRACTICE
    El Miedany, Y.
    El Gaafary, M.
    Youssef, S.
    Palmer, D.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2015, 74 : 1002 - 1002
  • [28] Beyond shared decision making: An expanded typology of medical decisions
    Whitney, Simon N.
    Holmes-Rovner, Margaret
    Brody, Howard
    Schneider, Carl
    McCullough, Laurence B.
    Volk, Robert J.
    McGuire, Amy L.
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2008, 28 (05) : 699 - 705
  • [29] Beyond involvement: multiple methods and purposes of shared decision making
    Hargraves, Ian
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2019, 8 (16) : 1345 - 1347
  • [30] SHARED DECISION MAKING Obstacles to shared decision making in France
    Debled, Marc
    Soum-Pouyalet, Fanny
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 343