Applications of reduced order models in the aeroelastic analysis of long-span bridges

被引:4
|
作者
Ebrahimnejad, L. [1 ,2 ]
Janoyan, K. D. [2 ]
Valentine, D. T. [2 ]
Marzocca, P. [2 ]
机构
[1] AECOM Technol Corp, Los Angeles, CA 90025 USA
[2] Clarkson Univ, Dept Mech & Aeronaut Engn, Potsdam, NY 13699 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Computational fluid dynamics; Aeroelastic analysis; Eigensystem realization algorithm; Long-span bridges; Reduced order model; PROPER ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITION; UNSTEADY AERODYNAMICS; SYSTEM-IDENTIFICATION; LINEAR-SYSTEMS; FLUTTER; FLOW; PREDICTION; SIMULATION; REDUCTION; SECTIONS;
D O I
10.1108/EC-07-2016-0244
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Purpose - The application of reduced order models (ROMs) in the aerodynamic/aeroelastic analysis of long-span bridges, unlike the aeronautical structures, has not been extensively studied. ROMs are computationally efficient techniques, which have been widely used for predicting unsteady aerodynamic response of airfoils and wings. This paper aims to discuss the application of a reduced order computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model based on the eigensystem realization algorithm (ERA) in the aeroelastic analysis of the Great Belt Bridge (GBB). Design/methodology/approach - The aerodynamic impulse response of the GBB section is used to construct the aerodynamic ROM, and then the aerodynamic ROM is coupled with the reduced DOF model of the system to construct the aeroelastic ROM. Aerodynamic coefficients and flutter derivatives are evaluated and compared to those of the advanced discrete vortex method-based CFD code. Findings - Results demonstrate reasonable prediction power and high computational efficiency of the technique that can serve for preliminary aeroelastic analysis and design of long-span bridges, optimization and control purposes. Originality/value - The application of a system identification tool like ERA into the aeroelastic analysis of long-span bridges is performed for the first time in this work. Authors have developed their earlier work on the aerodynamic analysis of long-span bridges, published in the Journal of Bridge Engineering, by coupling the aerodynamic forces with reduced DOF of structural system. The high computational efficiency of the technique enables bridge designers to perform preliminary aeroelastic analysis of long-span bridges in less than a minute.
引用
收藏
页码:1642 / 1657
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dynamic analysis of long-span bridges with vibration control systems: A novel reduced-order model and comparative study
    Liu, Zhanhang
    Sun, Limin
    Chen, Lin
    El Damatty, Ashraf
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2025, 333
  • [22] Computational models and methods for aerodynamic flutter of long-span bridges
    Ge, Y. J.
    Xiang, H. F.
    JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2008, 96 (10-11) : 1912 - 1924
  • [23] Advanced aerostatic analysis of long-span suspension bridges
    Zhang X.-J.
    Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 2006, 7 (3): : 424 - 429
  • [25] Coupled flutter and buffeting analysis of long-span bridges
    Jain, A
    Jones, NP
    Scanlan, RH
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 1996, 122 (07) : 716 - 725
  • [26] A new approach to aerostatic analysis of long-span bridges
    Ma, H.
    Su, C.
    Huang, Z.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-STRUCTURES AND BUILDINGS, 2009, 162 (02) : 129 - 135
  • [27] Coupled flutter analysis of long-span bridges by multimode and full-order approaches
    Ding, QS
    Chen, AR
    Xiang, HF
    JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2002, 90 (12-15) : 1981 - 1993
  • [28] Coupled flutter and buffeting analysis of long-span bridges
    Hart Consultant Group, Santa Monica, United States
    J Struct Eng, 7 (716-725):
  • [29] Reliability analysis of wind load for long-span bridges
    Yoo, C. H.
    Kim, H. K.
    BRIDGE MAINTENANCE, SAFETY, MANAGEMENT AND LIFE EXTENSION, 2014, : 1011 - 1014
  • [30] Flutter analysis of long-span bridges using ANSYS
    Hua, X. G.
    Chen, Z. Q.
    Ni, Y. Q.
    Ko, J. M.
    WIND AND STRUCTURES, 2007, 10 (01) : 61 - 82