Physical factors affecting the detection of calcifications in digital mammography

被引:0
|
作者
Shaw, CC [1 ]
Lai, CJ [1 ]
Liu, XM [1 ]
Kappadath, C [1 ]
Whitman, GJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Imaging Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
We are conducting a perception study to investigate the effects of detector design, magnification, and calcification size on the detection of calcifications in uniform as well as structured background. Calcium carbonate grains of various sizes were used to simulate calcifications. Three detectors were studied: a 100 mum aSi:H/CsI(TI) flat-panel system, a 30 mum CCD based system and an analog screen/film combination. The preliminary results show that the flat-panel system with a 100 mum pixel size outperformed a CCD based system with a 30 mum pixel size and an analog screen-film system. However, in studies with an anthropomorphic phantom as the background, the flat-panel system was outperformed by the other two systems. The presence of tissue structure background substantially reduced the calcification detectability. The use of geometric magnification generally improved the detectability with the exception of smallest and largest calcifications.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 78
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Factors affecting the rate of false positive marks in CAD in full-field digital mammography
    Engelken, Florian
    Bremme, Raphael
    Bick, Ulrich
    Hammann-Kloss, Sophie
    Fallenberg, Eva M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (08) : E844 - E848
  • [22] Factors affecting radiologist inconsistency in screening mammography
    Beam, CA
    Conant, EF
    Sickles, EA
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2002, 9 (05) : 531 - 540
  • [23] How do radiographic technique factors affect detection performance in digital mammography?
    Huda, W
    Jing, Z
    Qu, G
    Steinbach, BG
    Honeyman, JC
    RADIOLOGY, 1998, 209P : 160 - 161
  • [24] Effects of ambient light and view box luminance on the detection of calcifications in mammography
    KimmeSmith, C
    Haus, AG
    DeBruhl, N
    Bassett, LW
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 168 (03) : 775 - 778
  • [25] BENIGN BREAST CALCIFICATIONS AT MAMMOGRAPHY
    HAN, H
    KIM, JH
    CHUNG, HS
    KIM, JE
    RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 : 461 - 461
  • [26] Digital mammography: the human factors implications
    Brace, C.
    Gale, A. G.
    Wallis, M.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2006, 8 (Suppl 1) : S13 - S13
  • [27] Digital mammography: the human factors implications
    C Brace
    AG Gale
    M Wallis
    Breast Cancer Research, 8
  • [28] Automatic detection of microcalcifications in digital mammography
    Tao, E
    Ornes, C
    Sklansky, J
    MEDICAL IMAGING 1998: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1 AND 2, 1998, 3338 : 1450 - 1458
  • [29] Is Synthetic Mammography Comparable to Digital Mammography for Detection of Microcalcifications in Screening?
    Bae, Min Sun
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 289 (03) : 639 - 640
  • [30] Detection and characterization of microcalcifications in digital mammography
    Guillemet, H
    Benali, H
    Kahn, E
    DiPaola, R
    DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY '96, 1996, 1119 : 225 - 230