Computing statistics for Hamiltonian systems: A case study

被引:3
|
作者
Tupper, P. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Montreal, PQ H3A 2K6, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
symplectic integrators; Hamiltonian systems; invariant measures; long-tinic integration; step-and-project methods;
D O I
10.1016/j.cam.2006.05.036
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
We present the results of a set of numerical experiments designed to investigate the appropriateness of various integration schemes for molecular dynamics simulations. In particular, we wish to identify which numerical methods, when applied to an ergodic Hamiltonian system, sample the state-space in an unbiased manner. We do this by describing two Hamiltonian system for which we can analytically compute some of the important statistical features of its trajectories, and then applying various numerical integration schemes to them. We can then compare the results from the numerical simulation against the exact results for the system and see how closely they agree. The statistic we study is the empirical distribution of particle velocity over long trajectories of the systems. We apply four methods: one symplectic method (Stormer-Verlet) and three energy-conserving step-and-project methods. The symplectic method performs better on both test problems, accurately computing empirical distributions for all step-lengths consistent with stability. Depending on the test system and the method, the step-and-project methods are either no longer ergodic for any step length (thus giving the wrong empirical distribution) or give the correct distribution only in the limit of step-size going to zero. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:826 / 834
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Computing polarizabilities without a Hamiltonian matrix
    Wlotzka, Alexander
    Carrington, Tucker, Jr.
    CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 2012, 524 : 96 - 99
  • [42] DNA computing the Hamiltonian path problem
    Lee, CM
    Kim, SW
    Kim, SM
    Sohn, U
    MOLECULES AND CELLS, 1999, 9 (05) : 464 - 469
  • [43] Learning Hamiltonian dynamics with reservoir computing
    Zhang, Han
    Fan, Huawei
    Wang, Liang
    Wang, Xingang
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2021, 104 (02)
  • [44] On the limit-point case of singular linear Hamiltonian systems
    Sun, Huaqing
    APPLICABLE ANALYSIS, 2010, 89 (05) : 663 - 675
  • [45] Quasi-bi-Hamiltonian systems: Why the pfaffian case?
    Boualem, H.
    Brouzet, R.
    Rakotondralambo, J.
    PHYSICS LETTERS A, 2006, 359 (06) : 559 - 563
  • [46] Hamiltonian quantum computing with superconducting qubits
    Ciani, A.
    Terhal, B. M.
    DiVincenzo, D. P.
    QUANTUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 4 (03)
  • [47] Linear stability of perturbed Hamiltonian systems: theory and a case example
    Kapitula, T
    Kevrekidis, PG
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND GENERAL, 2004, 37 (30): : 7509 - 7526
  • [48] Natural Connections for Semi-Hamiltonian Systems: The Case of the ε-System
    Lorenzoni, Paolo
    Pedroni, Marco
    LETTERS IN MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 97 (01) : 85 - 108
  • [49] Synchronization of quasiperiodic oscillations in nearly Hamiltonian systems: The degenerate case
    Morozov, A. D.
    Morozov, K. E.
    CHAOS, 2021, 31 (08)
  • [50] INPUT OUTPUT DECOUPLING OF HAMILTONIAN-SYSTEMS - THE LINEAR CASE
    NIJMEIJER, H
    VANDERSCHAFT, AJ
    SYSTEMS & CONTROL LETTERS, 1985, 6 (01) : 53 - 58