Assisting allied health in performance evaluation: a systematic review

被引:18
|
作者
Lizarondo, Lucylynn [1 ]
Grimmer, Karen [1 ]
Kumar, Saravana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Australia, Int Ctr Allied Hlth Evidence, Sch Hlth Sci, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
关键词
Performance evaluation; Allied health; Quality in health care; Process; Outcomes; Health services; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; CLINICAL INDICATORS; CARE; FRAMEWORK; APPRAISAL; THOUGHTS; SERVICES; OUTCOMES; POLICY; STATE;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-014-0572-7
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Performance evaluation raises several challenges to allied health practitioners and there is no agreed approach to measuring or monitoring allied health service performance. The aim of this review was to examine the literature on performance evaluation in healthcare to assist in the establishment of a framework that can guide the measurement and evaluation of allied health clinical service performance. This review determined the core elements of a performance evaluation system, tools for evaluating performance, and barriers to the implementation of performance evaluation. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken. Five electronic databases were used to search for relevant articles: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsychInfo, and Academic Search Premier. Articles which focussed on any allied health performance evaluation or those which examined performance in health care in general were considered in the review. Content analysis was used to synthesise the findings from individual articles. Results: A total of 37 articles were included in the review. The literature suggests there are core elements involved in performance evaluation which include prioritising clinical areas for measurement, setting goals, selecting performance measures, identifying sources of feedback, undertaking performance measurement, and reporting the results to relevant stakeholders. The literature describes performance evaluation as multi-dimensional, requiring information or data from more than one perspective to provide a rich assessment of performance. A range of tools or instruments are available to capture various perspectives and gather a comprehensive picture of health care quality. Conclusions: Every allied health care delivery system has different performance needs and will therefore require different approaches. However, there are core processes that can be used as a framework to evaluate allied health performance. A careful examination of barriers to performance evaluation and subsequent tailoring of strategies to overcome these barriers should be undertaken to achieve the aims of performance evaluation. The findings of this review should inform the development of a standardised framework that can be used to measure and evaluate allied health performance. Future research should explore the utility and overall impact of such framework in allied health service delivery.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] How virtual reality is being adopted in anatomy education in health sciences and allied health: A systematic review
    Adnan, Sharmeen
    Benson, Amanda C.
    Xiao, Junhua
    ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2025,
  • [42] Delivering transgender-specific knowledge and skills into health and allied health studies and training: a systematic review
    L. Jecke
    F. D. Zepf
    European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2024, 33 : 1327 - 1354
  • [43] Delivering transgender-specific knowledge and skills into health and allied health studies and training: a systematic review
    Jecke, L.
    Zepf, F. D.
    EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 33 (05) : 1327 - 1354
  • [44] Impairment measures in rheumatic disorders for rehabilitation medicine and allied health care: a systematic review
    Swinkels, RAHM
    Bouter, LM
    Oostendorp, RAB
    van den Ende, CHM
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 25 (07) : 501 - 512
  • [45] The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review
    Edward AS Duncan
    Jennifer Murray
    BMC Health Services Research, 12
  • [46] A systematic review of evidence relating to clinical supervision for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals
    Pollock, Alex
    Campbell, Pauline
    Deery, Ruth
    Fleming, Mick
    Rankin, Jean
    Sloan, Graham
    Cheyne, Helen
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2017, 73 (08) : 1825 - 1837
  • [47] Factors that influence workplace location choices in the different allied health professions: A systematic review
    Couch, Anna
    Menz, Hylton B.
    Coker, Freya
    White, Jenni
    Haines, Terry
    Williams, Cylie
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2021, 29 (06) : 823 - 834
  • [48] Effectiveness of allied health therapy in the symptomatic management of progressive supranuclear palsy: A systematic review
    Tilley, E.
    White, S.
    Peters, M.
    Koblar, S. A.
    Doeltgen, S.
    McLoughlin, J.
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2015, 30 : S289 - S289
  • [49] Managerial leadership for research use in nursing and allied health care professions: a systematic review
    Gifford, Wendy A.
    Squires, Janet E.
    Angus, Douglas E.
    Ashley, Lisa A.
    Brosseau, Lucie
    Craik, Janet M.
    Domecq, Marie-Cecile
    Egan, Mary
    Holyoke, Paul
    Juergensen, Linda
    Wallin, Lars
    Wazni, Liquaa
    Graham, Ian D.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2018, 13
  • [50] How prepared are newly qualified allied health professionals for practice in the UK? A systematic review
    Brennan, Nicola
    Burns, Lorna
    Mattick, Karen
    Mitchell, Alexandra
    Henderson, Tristan
    Walker, Keith
    Gale, Thomas
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (05):