Reviewing the use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the evaluation of transport projects: Time for a multi-actor approach

被引:186
|
作者
Macharis, Cathy [1 ]
Bernardini, Annalia [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Brussel, Dept BUTO Business Technol & Operat, Res Grp MOBI Mobil Logist & Automot Technol, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis; Stakeholders; Transport; Mobility; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; EVALUATION FRAMEWORK; SCENARIO ANALYSIS; ANALYSIS MAMCA; SYSTEM; INFRASTRUCTURE; PROMETHEE; SELECTION; METHODOLOGIES; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.11.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper we give an overview of the use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for transport project appraisal. The aim of this review is to provide an outline of the increasing use of MCDA methods in the evaluation of transport projects. We investigate for which kind of transport decisions the MCDA methods are applied. The review consists of identifying the transport related subjects, the interconnected arising decision problems and the kind of representative MCDA method(s) used for transport project evaluations. This review allowed deriving a general frame for the evaluation of transport projects. One of the conclusions resulted in the importance of integrating stakeholders in the decision process not yet very common in the transport projects that were reviewed. The Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis (IVIAMCA) approach is suggested as a direction for further research. The MAMCA methodology has already proven its usefulness in several transport related decision problems enabling to involve the stakeholders explicitly in the decision process. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 186
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of software development projects using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach
    Buyukozkan, Gulcin
    Ruan, Da
    MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 2008, 77 (5-6) : 464 - 475
  • [22] Evaluation of decision trees: a multi-criteria approach
    Osei-Bryson, KM
    COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2004, 31 (11) : 1933 - 1945
  • [23] Recommendations of multi criteria analysis under multi actor decision condition in transport project evaluation
    Ongprasert, S
    Todoroki, T
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE EASTERN ASIA SOCIETY FOR TRANSPORTATION STUDIES, Vol 4, Nos 1 AND 2, 2003, 4 (1-2): : 1506 - 1519
  • [24] Multi-criteria analysis in transport project evaluation: an institutional approach
    De Brucker, Klaas
    Macharis, Cathy
    Verbeke, Alain
    EUROPEAN TRANSPORT-TRASPORTI EUROPEI, 2011, (47): : 3 - 24
  • [25] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS: A SPATIAL APPROACH FOR SUSTAINABLE URBAN TRANSPORT
    Toraman, Dogukan
    Demirel, Hande
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2014, 23 (12): : 3088 - 3094
  • [26] Fuzzy Multi-actor Multi-criteria Decision Making for sustainability assessment of biomass-based technologies for hydrogen production
    Ren, Jingzheng
    Fedele, Andrea
    Mason, Marco
    Manzardo, Alessandro
    Scipioni, Antonio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2013, 38 (22) : 9111 - 9120
  • [27] A social stakeholder support assessment of low-carbon transport policy based on multi-actor multi-criteria analysis: The case of Tianjin
    Sun, Hui
    Zhang, Yiting
    Wang, Yuning
    Li, Lei
    Sheng, Yun
    TRANSPORT POLICY, 2015, 41 : 103 - 116
  • [28] Designing successful energy communities: A comparison of seven pilots in Europe applying the Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis
    Lode, Maria Luisa
    Heuninckx, Shary
    te Boveldt, Geert
    Macharis, Cathy
    Coosemans, Thierry
    ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2022, 90
  • [29] Evaluation of Renewable Energy Projects Using Multi-Criteria Approach
    Malik, Arif
    Al Badi, Mohammed
    Al Kahali, Abdullah
    Al Nabhani, Younis
    Al Bahri, Alwarith
    Al Barhi, Hamed
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH IEEE GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (GHTC 2014), 2014, : 350 - 355
  • [30] Decision-making for sustainable transport and mobility: Multi actor multi criteria analysis
    Adesanya, Adewale
    SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2021, 58 (02): : 268 - 269