Comparing artificial intelligence techniques for chlorophyll-a prediction in US lakes

被引:27
|
作者
Luo, Wenguang [1 ]
Zhu, Senlin [2 ]
Wu, Shiqiang [2 ]
Dai, Jiangyu [2 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources & Hydropower Engn S, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Hydraul Res Inst, State Key Lab Hydrol Water Resources & Hydraul, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Chlorophyll-a; Natural lakes; Man-made lakes; MLPNN; ANFIS; NEURAL-NETWORK MODEL; REGRESSION-MODELS; FRESH-WATER; EUTROPHICATION; RESERVOIR; ANFIS; PERFORMANCE; VARIABLES; BLOOMS;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-019-06360-y
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Chlorophyll-a (CHLA) is a key indicator to represent eutrophication status in lakes. In this study, CHLA, total phosphorus (TP), total nitrogen (TN), turbidity (TB), and Secchi depth (SD) collected by the United States Environmental Protection Agency for the National Lakes Assessment in the continental USA were analyzed. Statistical analysis showed that water quality variables in natural lakes have strong patterns of autocorrelations than man-made lakes, indicating the perturbation of anthropogenic stresses on man-made lake ecosystems. Meanwhile, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS) with fuzzy c-mean-clustering algorithm (ANFIS_FC), ANFIS with grid partition method (ANFIS_GP), and ANFIS with subtractive clustering method (ANFIS_SC) were implemented to model CHLA in lakes, and modeling results were compared with the multilayer perceptron neural network models (MLPNN). Results showed that ANFIS_FC models outperformed other models for natural lakes, while for man-made lakes, MLPNN models performed the best. ANFIS_GP models have the lowest accuracies in general. The results indicated that ANFIS models can be screening tools for an overall estimation of CHLA levels of lakes in large scales, especially for natural lakes.
引用
收藏
页码:30524 / 30532
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Software Fault Prediction using Artificial Intelligence Techniques
    Haveri, Apeksha
    Suresh, Yeresime
    2017 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEMS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR SUSTAINABLE SOLUTION (CSITSS-2017), 2017, : 54 - 60
  • [22] Total Organic Carbon Prediction with Artificial Intelligence Techniques
    Goz, Eda
    Yuceer, Mehmet
    Karadurmus, Erdal
    29TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, PT A, 2019, 46 : 889 - 894
  • [23] Artificial Intelligence Techniques for the Prediction of Body Weights in Sheep
    Hamadani, Ambreen
    Ganai, Nazir Ahmad
    Alam, Safeer
    Mudasir, Syed
    Raja, Tariq A.
    Hussain, Ishraq
    Ahmad, Haider Ali
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL RESEARCH, 2024, 58 (05) : 884 - 889
  • [24] Prediction of Elimination of Compounds Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques
    Sharma, Anju
    Kumar, Rajnish
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND SYSTEMS BIOLOGY (BSB), 2018, : 123 - 127
  • [25] Disruption prediction with artificial intelligence techniques in tokamak plasmas
    J. Vega
    A. Murari
    S. Dormido-Canto
    G. A. Rattá
    M. Gelfusa
    Nature Physics, 2022, 18 : 741 - 750
  • [26] Substance use prediction using artificial intelligence techniques
    Unlu, Ali
    Subasi, Abdulhamit
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2025, 8 (01):
  • [27] Rockburst prediction using artificial intelligence techniques: A review
    Zhang, Yu
    Fang, Kongyi
    He, Manchao
    Liu, Dongqiao
    Wang, Junchao
    Guo, Zhengjia
    ROCK MECHANICS BULLETIN, 2024, 3 (03):
  • [28] Rockburst prediction using artificial intelligence techniques:A review
    Yu Zhang
    Kongyi Fang
    Manchao He
    Dongqiao Liu
    Junchao Wang
    Zhengjia Guo
    Rock Mechanics Bulletin, 2024, 3 (03) : 1 - 13
  • [29] Disruption prediction with artificial intelligence techniques in tokamak plasmas
    Vega, J.
    Murari, A.
    Dormido-Canto, S.
    Ratta, G. A.
    Gelfusa, M.
    NATURE PHYSICS, 2022, 18 (07) : 741 - 750
  • [30] Evaluation of artificial intelligence techniques in disease diagnosis and prediction
    Ghaffar Nia N.
    Kaplanoglu E.
    Nasab A.
    Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 3 (01):