Development of Health Equity Indicators in Primary Health Care Organizations Using a Modified Delphi

被引:22
|
作者
Wong, Sabrina T. [1 ,2 ]
Browne, Annette J. [1 ]
Varcoe, Colleen [1 ]
Lavoie, Josee [3 ,4 ]
Fridkin, Alycia [1 ]
Smye, Victoria [1 ,5 ]
Godwin, Olive [6 ]
Tu, David [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Sch Nursing, Crit Res Hlth & Healthcare Inequ Unit, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Ctr Hlth Serv & Policy Res, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[3] Univ Manitoba, Manitoba Nations Ctr Aboriginal Hlth Res 1, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[4] Univ Manitoba, Fac Med, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[5] Univ Western Ontario, Inst Technol, Oshawa, ON, Canada
[6] Prince George Div Family Practice, Prince George, BC, Canada
[7] Univ British Columbia, Fac Med, Dept Family Practice, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 12期
关键词
PATIENT ACTIVATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0114563
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop a core set of indicators that could be used for measuring and monitoring the performance of primary health care organizations' capacity and strategies for enhancing equity-oriented care. Methods: Indicators were constructed based on a review of the literature and a thematic analysis of interview data with patients and staff (n=114) using procedures for qualitatively derived data. We used a modified Delphi process where the indicators were circulated to staff at the Health Centers who served as participants (n=63) over two rounds. Indicators were considered part of a priority set of health equity indicators if they received an overall importance rating of >8.0, on a scale of 1-9, where a higher score meant more importance. Results: Seventeen indicators make up the priority set. Items were eliminated because they were rated as low importance (<8.0) in both rounds and were either redundant or more than one participant commented that taking action on the indicator was highly unlikely. In order to achieve health care equity, performance at the organizational level is as important as assessing the performance of staff. Two of the highest rated "treatment" or processes of care indicators reflects the need for culturally safe and trauma and violence-informed care. There are four indicators that can be used to measure outcomes which can be directly attributable to equity responsive primary health care. Discussion: These indicators and subsequent development of items can be used to measure equity in the domains of treatment and outcomes. These areas represent targets for higher performance in relation to equity for organizations (e.g., funding allocations to ongoing training in equity-oriented care provision) and providers (e.g., reflexive practice, skill in working with the health effects of trauma).
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Indicators for local health plan monitoring and evaluation: A modified Delphi consensus
    Santos, Joao Vasco
    Martins, Filipa Santos
    Vidal-Castro, Joana
    Silva-Rocha, Sofia
    Areias, Rita
    Oliveira, Antonio
    Santos, Sandra
    Lamelas, Cristina
    Amorim, Helena
    Martins, Alexandra
    Vieira, Mariana
    Ramos, Joao Pedro
    Pinto, Marta
    PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING, 2022, 39 (04) : 752 - 759
  • [32] Health care model and quality indicators: perceptions of primary health care professionals
    da Silva, Jose Mendes
    Caldeira, Antonio Prates
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2010, 26 (06): : 1187 - 1193
  • [33] Health assessments of refugee minors arriving in Norway - a modified Delphi study among health professionals in primary care settings
    Dangmann, Cecilie
    Kleppang, Annette Lovheim
    Leonhardt, Marja
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [34] Indicators of burnout in Primary Health Care workers
    Aires Garcia, Gracielle Pereira
    Palucci Marziale, Maria Helena
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2018, 71 : 2334 - 2342
  • [35] Income inequality, primary care, and health indicators
    Shi, LY
    Starfield, B
    Kennedy, B
    Kawachi, I
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 1999, 48 (04): : 275 - 284
  • [36] Primary care priorities in addressing health equity: summary of the WONCA 2013 health equity workshop
    Efrat Shadmi
    William CW Wong
    Karen Kinder
    Iona Heath
    Michael Kidd
    International Journal for Equity in Health, 13
  • [37] Healthcare workforce equity for health equity: An overview of its importance for the level of primary health care
    Santric Milicevic, M.
    Scotter, C. D. P.
    Bruno-Tome, A.
    Scheerens, C.
    Elingtone, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 39 (03): : 945 - 955
  • [38] Primary care priorities in addressing health equity: summary of the WONCA 2013 health equity workshop
    Shadmi, Efrat
    Wong, William C. W.
    Kinder, Karen
    Heath, Iona
    Kidd, Michael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2014, 13
  • [39] Priorities in health promotion according to primary care health professionals:: A delphi study
    Nebot, Manel
    Cabezas, Carmen
    Marques, Fernando
    Bimbela, Jose L.
    Robledo, Teresa
    Megido, Xus
    Prados, Jose A.
    Munoz, Elena
    ATENCION PRIMARIA, 2007, 39 (06): : 285 - 288
  • [40] The Australian Experiment: How Primary Health Care Organizations Supported the Evolution of a Primary Health Care System
    Nicholson, Caroline
    Jackson, Claire L.
    Marley, John E.
    Wells, Robert
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2012, 25 : S18 - S26