Sensitivity and specificity of Briganti nomogram in Turkish patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection

被引:2
|
作者
Sahin, Aytac [1 ]
Urkmez, Ahmet [2 ]
Yildirim, Caglar [1 ]
Kutluhan, Musab Ali [1 ]
Topaktas, Ramazan [3 ]
Verit, Ayhan [1 ]
机构
[1] Fatih Sultan Mehmet Egitim & Arastirma Hastanesi, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Haydarpasa Numune Egitim & Arastirma Hastanesi, TR-34668 Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Haydarpasa Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
AGING MALE | 2020年 / 23卷 / 05期
关键词
Briganti nomogram; prostate cancer; pelvic lymph node; invasion; radical prostatectomy; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; CANCER PATIENTS; INVASION; PROGRESSION; RISK; MEN;
D O I
10.1080/13685538.2019.1601176
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim: To investigate the accuracy of Briganti nomogram in patients who underwent Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). Methods: Hundred and sixty-five patients who underwent radical prostatectomy and PLND between 2012 and 2018 in our clinics were included, and their data were retrospectively screened. Results: The mean age of patients was 63.6 +/- 5.8 (range: 49-76) years. Hundred and thirty-five (81.8%) patients had a Briganti score of <5, whereas 30 (18.2%) had a Briganti score of >= 5. The preoperative T-PSA levels, biopsy grades and the incidence of T2b and T2c stages in patients with a Briganti score of >= 5 was significantly higher than that in patients with a Briganti score of <5 (p: .026; p: .000; p: .001, respectively). The incidence of lymph node positivity in patients with a Briganti score of >= 5 (76.7%) was significantly higher than that in patients with a Briganti score of <5 (25.2%) (p: .000). The sensitivity of the Briganti score to detect lymph node positivity was 40.35%, specificity was 93.52%, positive predictive value was 76.67% and the negative predictive value was 74.81%. The accuracy of the test was 75.15%. Conclusion: Nomograms provide useful information regarding prostate cancer. Risk estimates should be carefully considered, and treatment decisions should be given with a patient-specific approach.
引用
收藏
页码:836 / 840
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at the Time of Radical Prostatectomy: Extended, of Course
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Barletta, Francesco
    Torsi, Francesco Mon
    Briganti, Alberto
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 44 : 13 - 14
  • [22] Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at the Time of Radical Prostatectomy: Extended? Of Course Not!
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    Narain, Tushar A.
    Davda, Reena
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 44 : 18 - 19
  • [23] CONTEMPORARY NATIONAL TRENDS AND VARIATIONS OF PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Xia, Leilei
    Talwar, Ruchika
    Chelluri, Raju
    Lee, Daniel
    Guzzo, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E415 - E415
  • [24] Complications of Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy: Analysis and Risk Factors
    Castro, Pedro
    Arantes, Paulo B. O.
    Martins, Yves M. R.
    Reis, Matheus N. M.
    Drummond-Lage, Ana Paula
    Wainstein, Alberto J. A.
    PROSTATE CANCER, 2022, 2022
  • [25] Clinical outcome of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection
    Shibasaki, Noboru
    Hikami, Kensuke
    Akao, Toshiya
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 25 : 448 - 448
  • [26] Contemporary National Trends and Variations of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Xia, Leilei
    Chen, Bofeng
    Jones, Amanda
    Talwar, Ruchika
    Chelluri, Raju R.
    Lee, Daniel J.
    Guzzo, Thomas J.
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2021, 19 (04) : 309 - 315
  • [27] Lymphatic micrometastases predict biochemical recurrence in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer
    Maxeiner, Andreas
    Grevendieck, Andreas
    Pross, Therese
    Rudl, Marc
    Arnold, Alexander
    Stephan, Carsten
    Jung, Klaus
    Miller, Kurt
    Kilic, Ergin
    Busch, Jonas
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2019, 50 (06) : 612 - 618
  • [28] Molecular lymph node staging for bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection
    Heck, Matthias M.
    Koll, Florestan J.
    Retz, Margitta
    Autenrieth, Michael
    Magg, Kathrin
    Lunger, Lukas
    Gschwend, Juergen E.
    Nawroth, Roman
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 38 (07) : 639.e11 - 639.e19
  • [29] FIRST SENTINEL BASED NOMOGRAM PREDICTING THE PROBABILITY OF LYMPH NODE INVOLVEMENT IN PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS UNDERGOING RADIO GUIDED LYMPH NODE DISSECTION AND RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Winter, Alexander
    Kneib, Thomas
    Schatke, Niels
    Rohde, Martin
    Henke, Rolf-Peter
    Wawroschek, Friedhelm
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E76 - E76
  • [30] TEMPLATE BASED PELVIC LYMPH NODE METASTASIS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Patil, Nilesh
    Bhandari, Akshay
    Kaul, Sanjeev
    Diaz-Insua, Mireya
    Peabody, James
    Menon, Mani
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E341 - E341