Decision strategies in reward-based crowdfunding: the role of crowdfunding platforms

被引:4
|
作者
Bi, Gongbing [1 ]
Xiang, Qinghua [2 ]
Geng, Botao [1 ]
Xia, Qiong [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
[3] Hefei Univ Technol, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
关键词
Finance; Operations management; Modelling; Platform; Crowdfunding; Pricing decision; Competitive strength;
D O I
10.1108/JM2-10-2018-0179
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the influence of the crowdfunding platforms on reward-based crowdfunding projects. This study offers guidance for the creator on how to choose among platforms and how to make optimal product and pricing decisions. Design/methodology/approach Usually, crowdfunding platforms are able to help creators to lower unit costs and charge platform fees in return. In this paper, the reduction of the unit cost and the platform fee are selected for determining the competitive strength (CS) of a platform. Then, the CS affecting the creators and the backers of the projects is analyzed. Findings In the basic model, when the product quality level is exogenous, the optimal price increases in the product quality level and decreases in the difficulty level of the project, while the corresponding expected profit is a unimodal function of the product quality level and the difficulty level. In the endogenous case, the optimal price is exactly twice the unit cost. With the influence of platforms, platforms with higher CS tend to help the creator to lower the prices and to achieve higher profitability. Moreover, platforms with higher CS usually help the creator to offer higher quality products and to charge higher prices. Originality/value To the best of authors' knowledge, this paper is the first one to offer suggestions for creators on how to choose among crowdfunding platforms. The study provides theoretical guidance on product and pricing decisions on an analytical side.
引用
收藏
页码:569 / 589
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Exploring entrepreneurial legitimacy in reward-based crowdfunding
    Frydrych, Denis
    Bock, Adam
    Kinder, Tony
    Koeck, Benjamin
    VENTURE CAPITAL, 2014, 16 (03) : 247 - 269
  • [32] Love cannot buy you money: Resource exchange on reward-based crowdfunding platforms
    James, Tabitha L.
    Shen, Wenqi
    Townsend, David M.
    Junkunc, Marc
    Wallace, Linda
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2021, 31 (04) : 579 - 609
  • [33] Commitment or not? Creator's quality strategies with uncertain market in reward-based crowdfunding
    Gao, Qian
    Guo, Xiaolong
    Yang, Feng
    Yu, Yugang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2022, 60 (17) : 5307 - 5331
  • [34] A social recommendation approach for reward-based crowdfunding campaigns
    Li, Yung-Ming
    Liou, Jyh-Hwa
    Li, Yi-Wen
    INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2020, 57 (07)
  • [35] Project certification and screening in the reward-based crowdfunding market
    Yu, Jie
    Xiao, Shengsheng
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2023, 165
  • [36] Optimal reward-based crowdfunding with co-creation
    Cao, Yiyin
    Cheung, Hang
    Xiao, Zhongdong
    Shu, Wenjun
    Dang, Chuangyin
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2025,
  • [37] On the fixed and flexible funding mechanisms in reward-based crowdfunding
    Bi, Gongbing
    Geng, Botao
    Liu, Lindong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 279 (01) : 168 - 183
  • [38] Threshold Effects on Backer Motivations in Reward-Based Crowdfunding
    Li, Gen
    Wang, Jing
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2019, 36 (02) : 546 - 573
  • [39] A distinctive early bird price in reward-based crowdfunding
    Mingchun Chen
    Zhiying Liu
    Chaoliang Ma
    Xiuyuan Gong
    Electronic Commerce Research, 2021, 21 : 347 - 370
  • [40] AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF SPONSOR SATISFACTION IN REWARD-BASED CROWDFUNDING
    Zheng, Haichao
    Xu, Bo
    Wang, Tao
    Xu, Yun
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESEARCH, 2017, 18 (03): : 269 - 285