Jet fuel density via GC x GC-FID

被引:50
|
作者
Vozka, Petr [1 ]
Modereger, Brent A. [2 ]
Park, Anthony C. [3 ]
Zhang, Wan Tang Jeff [2 ]
Trice, Rodney W. [4 ]
Kenttamaa, Hilkka I. [2 ]
Kilaz, Gozdem [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Sch Engn Technol, Fuel Lab Renewable Energy, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Chem, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] Purdue Univ, Agr & Biol Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[4] Purdue Univ, Sch Mat Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
Fuel density; GC x GC; Jet fuel; Alternative jet fuel; PLS; Weighted average; SVM; PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES; BINARY-MIXTURES; GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS-SPECTROMETRY; REFRACTIVE-INDEX; SURFACE-TENSION; DIESEL FUELS; HYDROCARBONS; PURIFICATION; ENTHALPIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2018.08.110
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Aviation jet fuels contain over a thousand different hydrocarbons, making the prediction of their properties from chemical composition difficult. The density of a jet fuel at 15 degrees C is necessary for its certification. We present here an analytical approach for the determination of the density of jet fuels based on the chemical composition of the fuel determined via comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with flame ionization detector (GCxGC-FID). The analysis was carried out using two-dimensional gas chromatography with electron ionization high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry detection (GCxGC-TOF/MS) and flame ionization detection (GCxGC-FID). A detailed chemical composition analysis was performed on 50 samples, including petroleum-based aviation fuels and all approved alternative aviation fuel blending components. Fuel constituents were classified into seven hydrocarbon classes (n-paraffins, isoparaffins, monocycloparaffins, di-and tricycloparaffins, alkylbenzenes, cycloaromatic compounds, and alkylnaphthalenes) with the number of carbons in the range of 7-20. Several correlation algorithms and approaches were explored, including partial least squares regression (PLS) and support vector machines method (SVM), which yielded the most accurate results with mean absolute percentage errors of 0.1740% and 0.0984%, respectively. All used methods were validated utilizing uncalibrated validation samples.
引用
收藏
页码:1052 / 1060
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] GC-FID ANALYSIS OF FOOD SAMPLES MADE OF HEMP
    Lalge, Ajinkya Bharat
    Mendel, Peter
    Vyhnanek, Tomas
    Trojan, Vaclav
    Fiserova, Helena
    Hrivna, Ludek
    Mrkvicova, Eva
    Havel, Ladislav
    PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL PHD STUDENTS CONFERENCE, (MENDELNET 2016), 2016, : 600 - 604
  • [22] The Essential Guide to Optimizing Sensitivity in GC-FID Analysis
    不详
    LC GC EUROPE, 2019, 32 (02) : 102 - 102
  • [23] A GC-FID Method to Determine Styrene in Polystyrene Glasses
    Gennari, Oriella
    Albrizio, Stefania
    Monteiro, Magali
    FOOD ANALYTICAL METHODS, 2012, 5 (06) : 1411 - 1418
  • [24] Optimzation and validation of a GC-FID method for analysis of cocaine
    Yuksel, B.
    Bora, T.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2016, 258 : S189 - S189
  • [25] Quantitative GC-FID analysis of heroin for seized drugs
    Yuksel, Bayram
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND ANALYTICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 11 (01): : 38 - 42
  • [26] Application of GC-FID in Monitoring Composition of Motor Fuels
    Muzikova, Zlata
    Simacek, Pavel
    CHEMICKE LISTY, 2014, 108 (11): : 1067 - 1072
  • [27] Comparison between GC-TCD and GC-FID for the determination of propane in gas mixture
    Budiman, Harry
    Nuryatini
    Zuas, Oman
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON APPLIED CHEMISTRY 2015, 2015, 16 : 465 - 472
  • [28] Comparison of 1,4-dioxane Quantitation by GC-FID & GC-MS.
    Becktold, Christinna
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OIL CHEMISTS SOCIETY, 2021, 98 : 198 - 199
  • [29] GC-MS Identification and GC-FID Quantitation of Terpenoids in Ononidis spinosae Radix
    Ágnes E. Daruházi
    Szabolcs Szarka
    Éva Héthelyi
    Béla Simándi
    István Gyurján
    Miklós László
    Éva Szőke
    Éva Lemberkovics
    Chromatographia, 2008, 68 : 71 - 76
  • [30] GC-MS、GC-FID测定粉丝中的石蜡含量
    舒平
    杨卫花
    甘献明
    大理学院学报, 2010, 9 (04) : 61 - 63