Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial

被引:275
|
作者
Tsimoyiannis, Evangelos C. [1 ]
Tsimogiannis, Konstantinos E. [1 ]
Pappas-Gogos, George [1 ]
Farantos, Charalampos [1 ]
Benetatos, Nikolaos [1 ]
Mavridou, Paraskevi [2 ]
Manataki, Adamantia [2 ]
机构
[1] G Hatzikosta Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, GR-45332 Ioannina, Greece
[2] G Hatzikosta Gen Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, GR-45332 Ioannina, Greece
关键词
Minimally invasive surgery; Scarless cholecystectomy; New techniques in laparoscopy; Single-port access; Abdominal pain; Shoulder pain; INTRAPERITONEAL NORMAL SALINE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; ROPIVACAINE; INFUSION; INFILTRATION; BUPIVACAINE;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-010-0887-3
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The attempt to further reduce operative trauma in laparoscopic cholecystectomy has led to new techniques such as natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). These new techniques are considered to be painless procedures, but no published studies investigate the possibility of different pain scores in these new techniques versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In this randomized control study, we investigated pain scores in SILS cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Forty patients (34 women and 6 men) were randomly assigned to two groups. In group A (n = 20) four-port classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. Patients in group B (n = 20) underwent SILS cholecystectomy. In all patients, preincisional local infiltration of ropivacaine around the trocar wounds was performed. Infusion of ropivacaine solution in the right subdiaphragmatic area at the beginning of the procedure plus normal saline infusion in the same area at the end of the procedure was performed in all patients as well. Shoulder tip and abdominal pain were registered at 2, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively using visual analog scale (VAS). Significantly lower pain scores were observed in the SILS group versus the classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy group after the first 12 h for abdominal pain, and after the first 6 h for shoulder pain. Total pain after the first 24 h was nonexistent in the SILS group. Also, requests for analgesics were significantly less in the SILS group, while no difference was observed in incidence of nausea and vomiting between the two groups. SILS cholecystectomy, as well as the invisible scar, has significantly lower abdominal and shoulder pain scores, especially after the first 24 h postoperatively, when this pain is nonexistent. (Registration Clinical Trial number: NTC00872287, www.clinicaltrials.gov.
引用
收藏
页码:1842 / 1848
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) procedures on surgeon stress and workload: a randomized controlled trial
    Abdelrahman, Amro M.
    Bingener, Juliane
    Yu, Denny
    Lowndes, Bethany R.
    Mohamed, Amani
    McConico, Andrea L.
    Hallbeck, M. Susan
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (03): : 1205 - 1211
  • [22] Randomized Trial of Immediate Postoperative Pain Following Single-incision Versus Traditional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Guo Wei
    Liu Yang
    Han Wei
    Liu Jun
    Jin Lan
    Li Jian-She
    Zhang Zhong-Tao
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2015, 128 (24) : 3310 - 3316
  • [23] Randomized Trial of Immediate Postoperative Pain Following Single-incision Versus Traditional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Guo, Wei
    Liu, Yang
    Han, Wei
    Liu, Jun
    Jin, Lan
    Li, Jian-She
    Zhang, Zhong-Tao
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 128 (24) : 3310 - 3316
  • [24] RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS MINI CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    BARKUN, JS
    BARKUN, AN
    SAMPALIS, JS
    FRIED, G
    TAYLOR, B
    WEXLER, MJ
    GORESKY, CA
    MEAKINS, JL
    LANCET, 1992, 340 (8828): : 1116 - 1119
  • [25] CONVENTIONAL VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND THE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    NEUGEBAUER, E
    TROIDL, H
    SPANGENBERGER, W
    DIETRICH, A
    LEFERING, R
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 78 (02) : 150 - 154
  • [26] Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic single-incision cholecystectomy: results of a randomized controlled trial
    Grochola, Lukasz Filip
    Soll, Christopher
    Zehnder, Adrian
    Wyss, Roland
    Herzog, Pascal
    Breitenstein, Stefan
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (05): : 1482 - 1490
  • [27] Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic single-incision cholecystectomy: results of a randomized controlled trial
    Lukasz Filip Grochola
    Christopher Soll
    Adrian Zehnder
    Roland Wyss
    Pascal Herzog
    Stefan Breitenstein
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2019, 33 : 1482 - 1490
  • [28] Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Meta-analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Sajid, Muhammad S.
    Ladwa, Nikhil
    Kalra, Lorain
    Hutson, Kristian K.
    Singh, Krishna K.
    Sayegh, Mazin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 36 (11) : 2644 - 2653
  • [29] Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Meta-analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Muhammad S. Sajid
    Nikhil Ladwa
    Lorain Kalra
    Kristian K. Hutson
    Krishna K. Singh
    Mazin Sayegh
    World Journal of Surgery, 2012, 36 : 2644 - 2653
  • [30] Single-incision robotic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Sun, Ning
    Zhang, Jia Lin
    Zhang, Cheng Shuo
    Li, Xiao Hang
    Shi, Yue
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (36)