Co-benefits of climate mitigation on air quality and human health in Asian countries

被引:88
|
作者
Xie, Yang [1 ,2 ]
Dai, Hancheng [3 ]
Xu, Xinghan [4 ]
Fujimori, Shinichiro [2 ,4 ]
Hasegawa, Tomoko [2 ]
Yi, Kan [5 ]
Masui, Toshihiko [2 ]
Kurata, Gakuji [4 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Inst Environm Studies, Ctr Social & Environm Syst Res, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058506, Japan
[3] Peking Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Room 246,Environm Bldg, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[4] Kyoto Univ, Dept Environm Engn, Nishikyo Ku, Kyoto 6158540, Japan
[5] Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
关键词
Air quality; Health co-benefit; Climate mitigation; Economic impact; CGE; PREMATURE MORTALITY; ECONOMIC-IMPACTS; SCENARIO FRAMEWORK; POLLUTION; PM2.5; EMISSIONS; EXPOSURE; POLICIES; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Climate change mitigation involves reducing fossil fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, which is expensive, particularly under stringent mitigation targets. The co-benefits of reducing air pollutants and improving human health are often ignored, but can play significant roles in decision-making. In this study, we quantified the co-benefits of climate change mitigation on ambient air quality and human health in both physical and monetary terms with a particular focus on Asia, where air quality will likely be degraded in the next few decades if mitigation measures are not undertaken. We used an integrated assessment framework that incorporated economic, air chemistry transport, and health assessment models. Air pollution reduction through climate change mitigation under the 2 degrees C goal could reduce premature deaths in Asia by 0.79 million (95% confidence interval: 0.75-1.8 million) by 2050. This co-benefit is equivalent to a life value savings of approximately 2.8 trillion United States dollars (USD) (6% of the gross domestic product [GDP]), which is decidedly more than the climate mitigation cost (840 billion USD, 2% of GDP). At the national level, India has the highest potential net benefit of 1.4 trillion USD, followed by China (330 billion USD) and Japan (68 billion USD). Furthermore, in most Asian countries, per capita GDP gain and life value savings would increase with per capita GDP increasing. We robustly confirmed this qualitative conclusion under several socioeconomic and exposureresponse function assumptions.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 318
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A scoping review of human health co-benefits of forest-based climate change mitigation in Europe
    van den Bosch, Matilda
    Bartolomeu, Maria Lucia
    Williams, Sarah
    Basnou, Corina
    Hamilton, Ian
    Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark
    Pino, Joan
    Tonne, Cathryn
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 186
  • [32] Climate change and health in cities: impacts of heat and air pollution and potential co-benefits from mitigation and adaptation
    Harlan, Sharon L.
    Ruddell, Darren M.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, 3 (03) : 126 - 134
  • [33] Ancillary health effects of climate mitigation scenarios as drivers of policy uptake: a review of air quality, transportation and diet co-benefits modeling studies
    Chang, Kelly M.
    Hess, Jeremy J.
    Balbus, John M.
    Buonocore, Jonathan J.
    Cleveland, David A.
    Grabow, Maggie L.
    Neff, Roni
    Saari, Rebecca K.
    Tessum, Christopher W.
    Wilkinson, Paul
    Woodward, Alistair
    Ebi, Kristie L.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 12 (11):
  • [34] Quantifying air quality co-benefits of climate policy across sectors and regions
    Toon Vandyck
    Kimon Keramidas
    Stéphane Tchung-Ming
    Matthias Weitzel
    Rita Van Dingenen
    Climatic Change, 2020, 163 : 1501 - 1517
  • [35] Quantifying air quality co-benefits of climate policy across sectors and regions
    Vandyck, Toon
    Keramidas, Kimon
    Tchung-Ming, Stephane
    Weitzel, Matthias
    Van Dingenen, Rita
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2020, 163 (03) : 1501 - 1517
  • [36] Co-benefits of mitigating global greenhouse gas emissions for future air quality and human health
    J. Jason West
    Steven J. Smith
    Raquel A. Silva
    Vaishali Naik
    Yuqiang Zhang
    Zachariah Adelman
    Meridith M. Fry
    Susan Anenberg
    Larry W. Horowitz
    Jean-Francois Lamarque
    Nature Climate Change, 2013, 3 : 885 - 889
  • [37] Co-benefits of global and regional greenhouse gas mitigation for US air quality in 2050
    Zhang, Yuqiang
    Bowden, Jared H.
    Adelman, Zachariah
    Naik, Vaishali
    Horowitz, Larry W.
    Smith, Steven J.
    West, J. Jason
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2016, 16 (15) : 9533 - 9548
  • [38] Implications of incorporating air-quality co-benefits into climate change policymaking
    Nemet, G. F.
    Holloway, T.
    Meier, P.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2010, 5 (01):
  • [39] Assessing co-benefits incentivizes climate-mitigation action
    Horton, Daniel E.
    ONE EARTH, 2021, 4 (08): : 1069 - 1070
  • [40] Promoting win win situations in climate change mitigation, local environmental quality and development in Asian cities through co-benefits
    de Oliveira, Jose A. Puppim
    Doll, Christopher N. H.
    Kurniawan, Tonni Agustiono
    Geng, Yong
    Kapshe, Manmohan
    Huisingh, Donald
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 58 : 1 - 6