The Acetabular Fracture Prognostic Nomogram: Does it Work for Fractures of the Posterior Wall?

被引:12
|
作者
Moed, Berton R. [1 ]
McMahon, Megan J. [2 ]
Armbrecht, Eric S. [3 ]
机构
[1] St Louis Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 3635 Vista Ave,7th Floor Desloge Towers, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] St Louis Univ, Sch Med, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] St Louis Univ, Ctr Outcomes Res, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
posterior wall fractures; posterior wall fracture nonoperative treatment; examination under anesthesia; OPERATIVE TREATMENT; OUTCOMES; HIP;
D O I
10.1097/BOT.0000000000000480
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: A recently proposed nomogram is an attempt to define the subset of acetabular fractures at risk for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) within 2 years of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Our objectives were to determine whether this nomogram provides information adequate to reliably (1) prognosticate outcome within 2 years after ORIF or (2) identify optimal initial treatment choice (THA vs. ORIF) for patients with a posterior wall fracture. Design: Retrospective case series. Setting: University level 1 Trauma Center. Patients: From a database of consecutive posterior wall fractures treated by ORIF, 103 patients were identified for analysis: 6 with an unsatisfactory result at less than 2 years and 97 followed 2-14 years. Intervention: Calculation of percent risk of requiring THA within 2 years using the nomogram. Main Outcome Measurements: Comparison of this percent risk to the actual clinical outcome within 2 years after ORIF, measured in 2 ways: (1) THA performed (5 patients) and (2) overall unsatisfactory hip function determined by the modified Merle d'Aubigne score (9 patients total: the 5 with THA plus 4 additional without THA but having unsatisfactory hip function). Results: The calculated percent risk ranged widely, with much overlap among patients having satisfactory or unsatisfactory results of ORIF. Statistical analysis did not yield a clinically useful positive predictive value: 0.25 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.08-0.53] for THA and 0.44 (95% CI, 0.21-0.69) for an overall unsatisfactory clinical result. Conclusions: The acetabular fracture prognostic nomogram in its current form does not provide sufficient information to prognosticate outcome after ORIF or to determine appropriate surgical management for posterior wall fractures. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 212
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Associated lesions in posterior wall acetabular fractures: Not a valid predictor of failure
    Iselin L.D.
    Wahl P.
    Studer P.
    Munro J.T.
    Gautier E.
    Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2013, 14 (3) : 179 - 184
  • [32] Arthroscopic Reduction and Internal Fixation in Patients with Acetabular Posterior Wall Fractures
    Hwang, Jung-Mo
    Lee, Cheol-Won
    Kim, Pil-Sung
    Ha, Yong-Chan
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2023, 15 (05) : 718 - 724
  • [33] Imaging features of posterior wall acetabular fractures that predict early osteoarthritis
    Chow, S
    Marsh, JL
    Saterbak, AM
    Brandser, EA
    Nepola, JV
    Stevens, MA
    RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 : 1155 - 1155
  • [34] Late reconstruction of posterior acetabular wall fractures using iliac crest
    Zha, Guo-Chun
    Sun, Jun-Ying
    Chen, Lian
    Zheng, Hong-Ming
    Wang, Qiang
    Jin, Ye
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2012, 72 (05): : 1386 - 1392
  • [35] A biomechanical comparison of different fixation techniques for fractures of the acetabular posterior wall
    Wu, Xinbao
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 42 (03) : 673 - 679
  • [36] Use of Spring Plates in Fixation of Comminuted Posterior Wall Acetabular Fractures
    Lee, Christopher
    Johnson, Eric E.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2018, 32 : S55 - S59
  • [37] Management of traumatic labral tear in acetabular fractures with posterior wall component
    Yoo, J. H.
    Hwang, J. H.
    Chang, J. D.
    Oh, J. B.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2014, 100 (02) : 187 - 192
  • [38] A biomechanical comparison of different fixation techniques for fractures of the acetabular posterior wall
    Xinbao Wu
    International Orthopaedics, 2018, 42 : 673 - 679
  • [39] Posterior wall acetabular fracture fixation: A mechanical analysis of fixation methods
    Pease, F.
    Ward, A. J.
    Stevenson, A. J.
    Cunningham, J. L.
    Sabri, O.
    Acharya, M.
    Chesser, T. J. S.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2019, 27 (03)
  • [40] ACETABULAR POSTERIOR WALL FRACTURE - 38 CASES FOLLOWED FOR 5 YEARS
    AHO, AJ
    ISBERG, UK
    KATEVUO, VK
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1986, 57 (02): : 101 - 105