Parties often are associated with specific issues. They can own an issue when they develop a reputation of competence and attention in that domain. This paper develops an individual-level model of the effects of issue ownership, distinguishing between two aspects of this concept: which party is considered to care most about a given issue (associative ownership), and which one is perceived to have the best solutions (competence ownership). When a party is the associative owner of a given issue, voters' preferences on the corresponding issue should have a larger impact on the evaluation of the issue owner. But when a party is considered to be most competent in that domain, the effect of spatial distances should decrease. These hypotheses are tested with a statistical model that allows the impact of voter-party issue distances on party utilities to vary across both parties and issues. This model is tested with data from the 2011 Swiss election study.
机构:
Univ Calif Berkeley, Charles & Louise Travers Dept Polit Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USAUniv Calif Berkeley, Charles & Louise Travers Dept Polit Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
机构:
Purdue Univ, Krannert Grad Sch Management, 100 S Grant St, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USAPurdue Univ, Krannert Grad Sch Management, 100 S Grant St, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
Bagnoli, Mark
Watts, Susan
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Purdue Univ, Krannert Grad Sch Management, 100 S Grant St, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USAPurdue Univ, Krannert Grad Sch Management, 100 S Grant St, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA