Do 3D Printing Models Improve Anatomical Teaching About Hepatic Segments to Medical Students? A Randomized Controlled Study

被引:61
|
作者
Kong, Xiangxue [1 ]
Nie, Lanying [2 ]
Zhang, Huijian [3 ]
Wang, Zhanglin [1 ]
Ye, Qiang [4 ]
Tang, Lei [1 ]
Huang, Wenhua [1 ]
Li, Jianyi [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Sch Basic Med Sci, Dept Anat, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Med Biomech, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Traumat Orthoped, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Urol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Southern Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Radiol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION; VIRTUAL-REALITY; CORROSION CASTS; SURGERY; VEINS; CLASSIFICATION; RECONSTRUCTION; REAPPRAISAL; IMAGES;
D O I
10.1007/s00268-016-3541-y
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
It is a difficult and frustrating task for young surgeons and medical students to understand the anatomy of hepatic segments. We tried to develop an optimal 3D printing model of hepatic segments as a teaching aid to improve the teaching of hepatic segments. A fresh human cadaveric liver without hepatic disease was CT scanned. After 3D reconstruction, three types of 3D computer models of hepatic structures were designed and 3D printed as models of hepatic segments without parenchyma (type 1) and with transparent parenchyma (type 2), and hepatic ducts with segmental partitions (type 3). These models were evaluated by six experts using a five-point Likert scale. Ninety two medical freshmen were randomized into four groups to learn hepatic segments with the aid of the three types of models and traditional anatomic atlas (TAA). Their results of two quizzes were compared to evaluate the teaching effects of the four methods. Three types of models were successful produced which displayed the structures of hepatic segments. By experts' evaluation, type 3 model was better than type 1 and 2 models in anatomical condition, type 2 and 3 models were better than type 1 model in tactility, and type 3 model was better than type 1 model in overall satisfaction (P < 0.05). The first quiz revealed that type 1 model was better than type 2 model and TAA, while type 3 model was better than type 2 and TAA in teaching effects (P < 0.05). The second quiz found that type 1 model was better than TAA, while type 3 model was better than type 2 model and TAA regarding teaching effects (P < 0.05). Only TAA group had significant declines between two quizzes (P < 0.05). The model with segmental partitions proves to be optimal, because it can best improve anatomical teaching about hepatic segments.
引用
收藏
页码:1969 / 1976
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Do-it-yourself: 3D models of atomic orbitals through 3D printing
    Fogarty, Keir
    Griffith, Kaitlyn
    De Cataldo, Riccardo
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 251
  • [22] 3D printing of anatomical heart models for surgical planning in cardiac surgery
    Weber, S.
    Sodian, R.
    Markert, M.
    Reichart, B.
    Daebritz, S.
    Lueth, T. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2007, 2 : S171 - S173
  • [23] 3D Printing Improve the Effectiveness of Fracture Teaching and Medical Learning: A Comprehensive Scientometric Assessment and Future Perspectives
    Shi, Jian
    Fu, Shenao
    Cavagnaro, Maria Jose
    Xu, Shaokang
    Zhao, Mingyi
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [24] Impact of 3D printing on medical students' learning: a systematic review
    Zelada-Mirror, Mario
    Segura-Beltran, Francis
    Margas-Cavieres, Fabrizzio
    Rojas-Pino, Marcos
    SPANISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 5 (04):
  • [25] From medical imaging data to 3D printed anatomical models
    Bucking, Thore M.
    Hill, Emma R.
    Robertson, James L.
    Maneas, Efthymios
    Plumb, Andrew A.
    Nikitichev, Daniil I.
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (05):
  • [26] 3D PRINTING OF ANATOMY BIO-MODELS FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION
    Tan, Heang Kuan Joel
    Yap, Yee Ling
    Peh, Zhen Kai
    Yeong, Wai Yee
    Mogali, Sreenivasulu Reddy
    Srinivasan, Dinesh Kumar
    Ferenczi, Michael Alan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROGRESS IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING (PRO-AM 2016), 2016, : 21 - 26
  • [27] Orientation Planning in the Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printing of Anatomical Spine Models
    Damon, Aaron
    Clifton, William
    Valero-Moreno, Fidel
    Nottmeier, Eric
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (02)
  • [28] Three-dimensional printing models improve long-term retention in medical education of pathoanatomy: A randomized controlled study
    Al-Badri, Nour
    Touzet-Roumazeille, Sandrine
    Nuytten, Alexandra
    Ferri, Joel
    Charkaluk, Marie-Laure
    Nicot, Romain
    CLINICAL ANATOMY, 2022, 35 (05) : 609 - 615
  • [29] The Production of Anatomical Teaching Resources Using Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing Technology
    McMenamin, Paul G.
    Quayle, Michelle R.
    McHenry, Colin R.
    Adams, Justin W.
    ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2014, 7 (06) : 479 - 486
  • [30] Teaching of the subject 'Biomolecules in Living Organisms' using 3D printing models
    Gul, Seyda
    Yalinkilic, Funda
    EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2025,