Sustainability of Rooftop Technologies in Cold Climates: Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of White Roofs, Green Roofs, and Photovoltaic Panels

被引:35
|
作者
Cubi, Eduard [1 ]
Zibin, Nicholas F. [2 ]
Thompson, Sarah J. [3 ]
Bergerson, Joule [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Inst Sustainable Energy Environm & Econ, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Concordia Univ, Dept Bldg Civil & Environm Engn, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Queens Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Dept Chem & Petr Engn, Schulich Sch Engn, EEEL Bldg,Room 461B,2500 Univ Dr,NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
关键词
building energy use; green roofs; industrial ecology; life cycle assessment (LCA); solar photovoltaics; white roofs; ENERGY; BUILDINGS; ALBEDO; ELECTRICITY; METHODOLOGY; SINGAPORE; MODEL; HEAT; COST;
D O I
10.1111/jiec.12269
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainable building rooftop technologies, such as white roofs, green roofs, and photovoltaic(s) (PV) panels, are becoming increasingly implemented as a result of their associated environmental benefits. Studies of these rooftop technologies are often located in hot climates and do not assess their full environmental consequences. Further, current studies tend to focus on one technology and often do not evaluate the full range of technology options using a systematic framework with common assumptions and boundaries. This article evaluates the environmental performance on a life cycle basis of white roofs, green roofs, and roof-mounted PV in the cold Canadian climate. Solar PV demonstrates the highest environmental performance in all impact categories considered (see complete list in Results section) and is the preferred option from an environmental perspective. Green roofs result in beneficial environmental impacts, although much less significant than those obtained with PV, and are the only rooftop technology that reduces both heating and cooling energy use. The environmental performance of white roofs in cold climates is strongly affected by the heating penalty (i.e., the increase in heating energy use resulting from the high solar reflectance). Although white roofs have been proven an outstanding option in warmer climates, in cold climates, net negative environmental impacts lead to white roof technology not being recommended for general applications in cold climates. A sensitivity analysis shows that the conclusions in this study provide robust insights across Canada and cold climates in general.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 262
页数:14
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [21] Embedding "substrate" in environmental assessment of green roofs life cycle: evidences from an application to the whole chain in a Mediterranean site
    Peri, Giorgia
    Traverso, Marzia
    Finkbeiner, Matthias
    Rizzo, Gianfranco
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 35 : 274 - 287
  • [22] Enhancement of life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology to include the effect of surface albedo on climate change: Comparing black and white roofs
    Susca, Tiziana
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2012, 163 : 48 - 54
  • [23] Cradle-to-gate Life Cycle Assessment of traditional gravel ballasted, white reflective, and vegetative roofs: A Lebanese case study
    El Bachawati, Makram
    Manneh, Rima
    Belarbi, Rafik
    Dandres, Thomas
    Nassab, Carla
    El Zakhem, Henri
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 137 : 833 - 842
  • [24] Life Cycle Assessment for Photovoltaic Structures-Comparative Study of Rooftop and Free-Field PV Applications
    Neumueller, Anna
    Geier, Stefan
    Oesterreicher, Doris
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (18)
  • [25] Sustainability of cellulose micro-/nanofibers: A comparative life cycle assessment of pathway technologies
    Arfelis, Sergi
    Aguado, Roberto J.
    Civancik, Didem
    Fullana-i-Palmer, Pere
    Pelach, M. Angels
    Tarres, Quim
    Delgado-Aguilar, Marc
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 874
  • [26] Prospective life cycle assessment of recycling systems for spent photovoltaic panels by combined application of physical separation technologies
    Heiho, Aya
    Suwa, Izuru
    Dou, Yi
    Lim, Soowon
    Namihira, Takao
    Koita, Taketoshi
    Mochidzuki, Kazuhiro
    Murakami, Shinsuke
    Daigo, Ichiro
    Tokoro, Chiharu
    Kikuchi, Yasunori
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2023, 192
  • [27] A comparative life-cycle assessment of photovoltaic electricity generation in Singapore by multicrystalline silicon technologies
    Luo, Wei
    Khoo, Yong Sheng
    Kumar, Abhishek
    Low, Jonathan Sze Choong
    Li, Yanmin
    Tan, Yee Shee
    Wang, Yan
    Aberle, Armin G.
    Ramakrishna, Seeram
    SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS, 2018, 174 : 157 - 162
  • [28] Life-cycle assessment of cradle-to-grave opportunities and environmental impacts of organic photovoltaic solar panels compared to conventional technologies
    Tsang, Michael P.
    Sonnemann, Guido W.
    Bassani, Dario M.
    SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS, 2016, 156 : 37 - 48
  • [29] Is small or big solar better for the environment? Comparative life cycle assessment of solar photovoltaic rooftop vs. ground-mounted systems
    Riya Roy
    Joshua M. Pearce
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2024, 29 : 516 - 536
  • [30] Is small or big solar better for the environment? Comparative life cycle assessment of solar photovoltaic rooftop vs. ground-mounted systems
    Roy, Riya
    Pearce, Joshua M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2024, 29 (03): : 516 - 536