The Industry 4.0 technological safety

被引:0
|
作者
Gurjanov, A., V [1 ]
Shukalov, A., V [2 ]
Zharinov, I. O. [2 ]
机构
[1] Stock Co Expt Design Bur Electroavtomat, 40 Marshala Govorova St, St Petersburg 198095, Russia
[2] ITMO Univ, Fac Informat Secur & Comp Technol, 49 Kronverksky Av, St Petersburg 197101, Russia
关键词
TRENDS; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1088/1755-1315/548/6/062035
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The production processes have some negative consequences for the environment. The potentially ecologically dangerous technologies and equipment require a constant attention form the company board and the controlling State structures. The technical means to provide the production technological safety equal to the appearing technological risks are engineer cyber-system (ECS) to neutralize toxins throwing away to the nature. The ECS support the company life ability and locally placed in categorized production rooms given for auxiliary equipment. The company production and ECS procedure algorithms are done with the intellectual production system to react operatively for critical values of emergencies with negative ecology influences. The production infrastructure conditions correct evaluation is reached with ECSs inquiry to prevent the emergencies from happening. There is a system to classify ECSs, which provide the company technological safety. There is ecologically safe automatic cyber-production architecture where the most efficient format is done with three coils, which constantly interact in production components.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Industry 4.0: coherent definition framework with technological and organizational interdependencies
    Nosalska, Katarzyna
    Piatek, Zbigniew Michal
    Mazurek, Grzegorz
    Rzadca, Robert
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2020, 31 (05) : 837 - 862
  • [22] Technological features of educating specialists for digital factories of the Industry 4.0
    Zakoldaev, D. A.
    Gurjanov, A., V
    Shukalov, A., V
    Zharinov, I. O.
    INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON APPLIED PHYSICS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES AND ENGINEERING (APITECH-2019), 2019, 1399
  • [23] Technological Acceptance of Industry 4.0 by Students from Rural Areas
    Castillo-Vergara, Mauricio
    Alvarez-Marin, Alejandro
    Villavicencio Pinto, Eduardo
    Enrique Valdez-Juarez, Luis
    ELECTRONICS, 2022, 11 (14)
  • [24] The logic of technological progress under capitalism in the context of industry 4.0
    Savul, Guven
    JOURNAL OF LABOR AND SOCIETY, 2020, 23 (04): : 433 - 460
  • [25] Achieving Technological Transformation and Social Sustainability: An Industry 4.0 Perspective
    Mondal, Sourav
    Singh, Saumya
    Gupta, Himanshu
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2023, 71 : 6623 - 6635
  • [26] ANALYSIS OF THE INDUSTRY 4.0 MODEL FOR TECHNOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION IN THE BUSINESS SECTOR
    Dominguez, Luis
    TELEMATIQUE, 2021, 20 (02): : 3 - 19
  • [27] Quality managers and their future technological expectations related to Industry 4.0
    Zavadska, Zuzana
    Zavadsky, Jan
    TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2020, 31 (7-8) : 717 - 741
  • [28] Social consequences of technological development. Beyond industry 4.0
    Fernandez de Aguirre, Ignacio
    DYNA, 2017, 92 (05): : 481 - 482
  • [29] Implementing safety features of Industry 4.0 without compromising safety culture
    Lees, Michael J.
    Johnstone, Monique C.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2021, 54 (13): : 680 - 685
  • [30] A Critical Review of Product Safety in Industry 4.0 Applications
    Li, C. H.
    Lau, H. K.
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2017, : 1661 - 1665