Cobotic Assembly Line Design Problem with Ergonomics

被引:6
|
作者
Abdous, Mohammed-Amine [1 ,2 ]
Delorme, Xavier [1 ]
Battini, Daria [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Clermont Auvergne, Inst Henri Fayol, CNRS, Mines St Etienne,UMR LIMOS 6158, F-42023 St Etienne, France
[2] Univ Padua, Dept Management & Engn, Vicenza, Italy
关键词
Semi-automated manufacturing systems; Assembly Line Design Problem; Ergonomics; Human-machine collaboration; Industry; 4.0; BALANCING PROBLEMS; COST;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-62412-5_47
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Demands for smaller lot sizes of mass-customized products increased the need for flexibility and adaptability in production lines. Semiautomatic manufacturing systems that involve human operators as well as technological equipment increase the flexibility of manufacturing systems. Such systems combine the benefits of human flexibility and new industrial and assistive technology. The key combinatorial problem to solve in the design of semi-automatic manufacturing lines is the assembly line balancing problem with the selection of equipment. An efficient and sustainable line design requires a cost-effective choice of equipment, and the presence of human increase the importance of ergonomics. In this work, we propose a Multi-objective Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming (MO-MINLP) for the design of semi-automated assembly lines. The objectives are the optimization of the design cost and the ergonomics level, modeled with the fatigue and recovery of workers. We propose to solve the problem with a bi-objective local search algorithm, based on the Iterative Local Search metaheuristic. We apply the algorithm on a case study to illustrate the originality of the problem and the solving algorithm.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 582
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An integrated model to incorporate ergonomics and resource restrictions into assembly line balancing
    Kara, Yakup
    Atasagun, Yakup
    Gokcen, Hadi
    Hezer, Seda
    Demirel, Neslihan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2014, 27 (11) : 997 - 1007
  • [22] 2ND IMPROVEMENT OF ASSEMBLY LINE WITH ROBOTS BY PARTICIPATORY ERGONOMICS
    NAGAMACHI, M
    ERGONOMICS INTERNATIONAL 88, 1988, : 720 - 722
  • [23] Design elements of a branch and bound procedure for solving the assembly line balancing problem
    Nichols, KB
    Patterson, J
    DECISION SCIENCES INSTITUTE 1998 PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-3, 1998, : 1468 - 1470
  • [24] Design of a Virtual Assembly Gesture Library and Optimization of Ergonomics Evaluation
    Guo J.
    Xu Z.
    He Q.
    Shanghai Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2022, 56 (02): : 127 - 133
  • [25] Human Factors Issues for the Design of a Cobotic System
    Moulieres-Seban, Theo
    Bitonneau, David
    Salotti, Jean-Marc
    Thibault, Jean-Francois
    Claverie, Bernard
    ADVANCES IN HUMAN FACTORS IN ROBOTS AND UNMANNED SYSTEMS, 2017, 499 : 375 - 385
  • [26] On a generalized assembly line balancing problem
    Nicosia, G
    Pacciarelli, D
    Pacifici, A
    FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OPERATIONS AND QUANTITATIVE MANAGEMENT, VOL 1 AND 2, 1997, : 548 - 555
  • [27] Hybrid assembly line design
    Rekiek, B
    Delchambre, A
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2001 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ASSEMBLY AND TASK PLANNING (ISATP2001): ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY, 2001, : 73 - 78
  • [28] Evaluation of the influence of dominance rules for the assembly line design problem under consideration of product design alternatives
    Oesterle, Jonathan
    Lionel, Amodeo
    ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2018, 50 (06) : 982 - 995
  • [29] An advanced multiobjective genetic algorithm design for the time and space assembly line balancing problem
    Chica, Manuel
    Cordon, Oscar
    Damas, Sergio
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 61 (01) : 103 - 117
  • [30] The Robotic Assembly Line Design (RALD) problem: Model and case studies with practical extensions
    Michels, Adalberto Sato
    Lopes, Thiago Cantos
    Stall Sikora, Celso Gustavo
    Magatao, Leandro
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 120 : 320 - 333