Upgrading on radical prostatectomy specimens of very low- and low-risk prostate cancer patients on active surveillance: A population-level analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Sayyid, Rashid K. [1 ]
Wilson, Brandon [2 ]
Benton, John Z. [2 ]
Lodh, Atul [2 ]
Thomas, Eric F. [1 ]
Goldberg, Hanan [3 ]
Madi, Rabii [1 ,4 ]
Terris, Martha K. [1 ,4 ]
Wallis, Christopher J. D. [5 ]
Klaassen, Zachary [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Augusta Univ, Med Coll Georgia, Dept Surg, Sect Urol, Augusta, GA USA
[2] Med Coll Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
[3] State Univ New York Upstate, Dept Urol, Syracuse, NY USA
[4] Georgia Canc Ctr, Augusta, GA USA
[5] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Urol, Nashville, TN USA
来源
关键词
FOLLOW-UP;
D O I
10.5489/cuaj.6868
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: A proportion of prostate cancer (PCa) patients initially managed with active surveillance (AS) are upgraded to a higher Gleason score (GS) at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP). Our objective was to determine predictors of upgrading on RP specimens using a national database. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Prostate with Watchful Waiting database was used to identify AS patients diagnosed with very low- or low-risk PCa who underwent delayed RP between 2010 and 2015. The primary outcome was upgrading to GS 7 disease or worse. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate demographic and oncological predictors of upgrading on final specimen. Results: A total of 3775 men underwent RP after a period of AS, 3541 (93.8%) of whom were cT2a; 792 (21.0%) patients were upgraded on RP specimen, with 85.4%, 10.6%, and 3.4% upgraded to GS 7(3+4), 7(4+3), and 8 diseases, respectively. On multivariable analysis, higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at diagnosis (5-10 vs. 0-2 ng/ml, odd ratio [OR] 2.59, p<0.001) and percent core involvement (80-100% vs. 0-20%, OR 2.52, p=0.003) were significant predictors of upgrading on final RP specimen, whereas higher socioeconomic status predicted lower odds of upgrading (highest vs. lowest quartile OR 0.75, p=0.013). Conclusions: Higher baseline PSA and percent positive cores involvement are associated with significantly increased risk of upgrading on RP after AS, whereas higher socioeconomic status predicts lower odds of such events. These results may help identify patients at increased risk of adverse pathology on final specimen who may benefit from earlier definitive treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:E335 / E339
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer in Black Patients
    Butler, Santino
    Muralidhar, Vinayak
    Chavez, Janice
    Fullerton, Zoe
    Mahal, Aman
    Nezolosky, Michelle
    Vastola, Marie
    Zhao, Shuang G.
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    Dess, Robert T.
    Feng, Felix Y.
    King, Martin T.
    Mouw, Kent W.
    Spratt, Daniel E.
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Rebbeck, Timothy R.
    Mahal, Brandon A.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 380 (21): : 2070 - 2072
  • [22] Radical Prostatectomy (RP) Findings In Men with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer (PC) In a Contemporary Triethnic Population - Implications for Active Surveillance (AS)
    Braunhut, Beth L.
    Freire, Rochelle
    Kryvenko, Oleksandr
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2018, 31 : 330 - 330
  • [23] Radical Prostatectomy (RP) Findings In Men with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer (PC) In a Contemporary Triethnic Population - Implications for Active Surveillance (AS)
    Braunhut, Beth L.
    Freire, Rochelle
    Kryvenko, Oleksandr
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2018, 98 : 330 - 330
  • [24] PATHOLOGIC OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS AFFECTED BY VERY-LOW-RISK AND LOW-RISK PROSTATE CANCER AND ELIGIBLE FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE
    Napodano, Giorgio
    Realfonso, Tommaso
    Intilla, Olivier
    Pistone, Antonio
    Addesso, Maria
    Sanseverino, Roberto
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 37 (04) : 2081 - 2082
  • [25] Low serum total testosterone level as a predictor of upstaging and upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer patients meeting the inclusion criteria for active surveillance
    Ferro, Matteo
    Lucarelli, Giuseppe
    Bruzzese, Dario
    Di Lorenzo, Giuseppe
    Perdona, Sisto
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Cantiello, Francesco
    La Rocca, Roberto
    Busetto, Gian Maria
    Cimmino, Amelia
    Buonerba, Carlo
    Battaglia, Michele
    Damiano, Rocco
    De Cobelli, Ottavio
    Mirone, Vincenzo
    Terracciano, Daniela
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (11) : 18424 - 18434
  • [26] Personalised biopsy schedules based on risk of Gleason upgrading for patients with low-risk prostate cancer on active surveillance
    Tomer, Anirudh
    Nieboer, Daan
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Bjartell, Anders
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Rizopoulos, Dimitris
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 127 (01) : 96 - 107
  • [27] Prospective quality-of-life outcomes for low-risk prostate cancer: Active surveillance versus radical prostatectomy
    Jeldres, Claudio
    Cullen, Jennifer
    Hurwitz, Lauren M.
    Wolff, Erika M.
    Levie, Katherine E.
    Odem-Davis, Katherine
    Johnston, Richard B.
    Pham, Khanh N.
    Rosner, Inger L.
    Brand, Timothy C.
    L'Esperance, James O.
    Sterbis, Joseph R.
    Etzioni, Ruth
    Porter, Christopher R.
    CANCER, 2015, 121 (14) : 2465 - 2473
  • [28] Active surveillance preferred for low-risk prostate cancer
    Bagcchi, Sanjeet
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2015, 16 (08): : E384 - E384
  • [29] Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer
    Large, Michael C.
    Eggener, Scott E.
    ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2009, 23 (11): : 974 - 979
  • [30] Dutasteride and active surveillance of low-risk prostate cancer
    Fleshner, Neil E.
    LANCET, 2012, 379 (9826): : 1590 - 1590